anonymoose
Classical Liberal
TulsiWhat a dumb thread.
Pam Bondi and Karoline Leavitt come to mind.
Strong women in high positions.
TulsiWhat a dumb thread.
Pam Bondi and Karoline Leavitt come to mind.
Strong women in high positions.
Ballot initiatives re. abortion allowed women to protect their rights, and still vote against having a woman in the White House. It think that hurt Harris."Removed [sic] this woman from public service," declared influential Christian nationalist pastor Joel Webbon, part of the "TheoBros" movement that includes the leadership of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's church. Soon other TheoBros jumped in, declaring "We need Christian men leading the fight against abortion," arguing that women's suffrage was a mistake, and accusing Hawkins of emasculating her husband by being "busy jet-setting."
Forty-five percent of female voters backed Trump in 2024, despite his overt misogyny. Most, no doubt, believed that complicity would protect them and that the attacks would be centered on other women. But while the GOP certainly wants to strip liberal and feminist women of their rights, male MAGA leaders are showing increasing interest in bringing Republican women to heel, both culturally and through the force of law. After all, they are more likely to live and work with Republican women. If they want to feel the full flowering of male domination, it's Republican women they need to see submitting.
Webbon and the TheoBros have been clamoring more loudly in recent months about their wish to strip women, especially their own wives, of the right to vote. "You won't let women vote? Well, our society doesn't let five-year-olds vote," Webbon explained in a May podcast. He added that "a woman is like a child" and that "God has appointed men to protect them." As Sarah Stankorb at the New Republic documented, there has been growing support in Christian nationalist circles "for the repeal of the 19th Amendment and support a 'household vote' system in which men vote on behalf of their families." Hegseth's former sister-in-law reports she heard him echo similar sentiments.
![]()
"A woman is like a child": MAGA quickly turns its sights on stripping Republican women of power
Conservative women believe complicity will save them. But an emboldened far-right is gunning for their rightsnews.yahoo.com
That would probably help women. An abusive, or cheating husband might be held at fault.Similarly, there's been a slowly rising volume on the right of talk about banning no-fault divorce, fueled by Republicans like Vice President JD Vance saying it's too easy for women — even those in abusive marriages — to leave their marriages. Legislators in red states are filing more bills to do so, and while it's unlikely any will pass soon, the goal is to create more momentum for an eventual ban. This would affect Republican women more because, as with abortion bans, only red states would even consider such laws. It's also true that red states have higher divorce rates than blue states, because sexist cultural mores lead to more unhappy marriages. But rather than treating their wives better, MAGA men are looking at making it illegal for their wives to leave them.
There have been recent visceral examples of how the increasingly bold sexism on the right is impacting women, especially in Republican circles.
Now do people of colorThe data tell a compelling story.
14 percent of Republicans in the House of Reps are women.
58 percent of Democrats in the House of Reps are women.
LOL. Michelle Bachman comes to mindThese type of women need a daddy, they need domination. I have no problem with that, it’s a personal choice, but my issue is when they wish to make us all Hand Maidens, then I have a problem. I do not believe in their religion, I do not believe in male dominance.
And don't have the right to vote.It's what we've known. "Make America Great Again" = take America back to the 1950's. Minorities work menial jobs, women are in the kitchen, and LGBTQ is fully in the closet.
That makes no sense.if you support no fault divorce, you do indeed support the legal rape of men in a courtroom setting
The Left knows this is not a woman, but if she wants to be called a woman, they will oblige her
because you choose to ignore itThat makes no sense.
No fault divorce is a disgrace when men are demonstrably shat upon in the marriage.Similarly, there's been a slowly rising volume on the right of talk about banning no-fault divorce, fueled by Republicans like Vice President JD Vance saying it's too easy for women — even those in abusive marriages — to leave their marriages. Legislators in red states are filing more bills to do so, and while it's unlikely any will pass soon, the goal is to create more momentum for an eventual ban. This would affect Republican women more because, as with abortion bans, only red states would even consider such laws. It's also true that red states have higher divorce rates than blue states, because sexist cultural mores lead to more unhappy marriages. But rather than treating their wives better, MAGA men are looking at making it illegal for their wives to leave them.
There have been recent visceral examples of how the increasingly bold sexism on the right is impacting women, especially in Republican circles.
Ignore what?because you choose to ignore it
that no fault divorce allows for the legal and financial rape of men in America today.Ignore what?
That makes no sensethat no fault divorce allows for the legal and financial rape of men in America today.
are you that ignorant?That makes no sense
Why don't you explain it to us? Nobody can challenge a divorce now. Without no fault, one party would prove that the other party was negligent.are you that ignorant?
the bias against men in the court systems, as well as the family law courts, allows for a woman to file for divorce simply because she wants to. She can then take his kids, half his stuff, get spousal support, even claim domestic abuse and not have to provide any proof, forcing the soon to be ex husband to try and prove he didn't do anything, all because the woman is no longer happy.Why don't you explain it to us? Nobody can challenge a divorce now. Without no fault, one party would prove that the other party was negligent.
You are describing no fault divorce. That is not what this thread is about.the bias against men in the court systems, as well as the family law courts, allows for a woman to file for divorce simply because she wants to. She can then take his kids, half his stuff, get spousal support, even claim domestic abuse and not have to provide any proof, forcing the soon to be ex husband to try and prove he didn't do anything, all because the woman is no longer happy.
79% of people who commit suicide are male. Of those 79%, men who have been divorced are 9 times more likely to commit suicide as compared to divorced women. Why do you think that is, if you can answer honestly and without being sarcastic or petty.
As he should be as long as it's not he said she said. But we all know that at least in America 7 out of 10 divorces are initiated by women for selfish reasons not related to the above.That would probably help women. An abusive, or cheating husband might be held at fault.
Sadly, Yesare you that ignorant?
the topic of no fault divorce was brought up in the thread, so I was discussing itYou are describing no fault divorce. That is not what this thread is about.
I know. But you seem to have it backward.the topic of no fault divorce was brought up in the thread, so I was discussing it