The fired fed's list

Diogenes

Diogenes

Nemo me impune lacessit
Gkem2qTaoAA1eEc
 
LMAO.

MAGA has found a way to game the Community Notes system into getting broader reach for destroying liberal talking points.

Meltdowns galore after Trump cleaned house at the Pentagon - Community Note left-wingers come in and point out the ridiculousness of their own outrage.

Genius, @JackPosobiec.



GkfFsxXXkAArlvQ
 
Diogenes said:
After receiving an email, another federal employee goes on an unhinged rant about how she refuses to reply and how much she hates her “fucking job” and the “mental gymnastics” she has to endure because “democracy is being dismantled.” She adds that she never believed the U.S. “would be under attack by its own president.”



https://twitter.com/x/status/1893711293225250856
View: https://x.com/i/status/1893711293225250856
Click to expand...
Um... Bureaucracy is not Democracy. Democracy is what got Trump his job, Bureaucracy is what Trump is dismantling. I get your confusion, you think your job security equals "democracy" but... it doesn't.
 
Damocles said:
lol. Just use grok.com to write it for you. Put in your job description, ask Grok to write an email justifying your job... Use his own AI "against" him. That's what I'd do.... Just sayin'...
Click to expand...


Houston, we have a problem.


To determine what the user "Diogenes" has done on JustPlainPolitics.com over the past week (February 16–23, 2025), I would typically need access to real-time data from the site, such as posts, threads, or other activities tied to that username. However, as of now, I don’t have direct access to the site’s activity logs or user data for that specific timeframe. My knowledge is broad and continuously updated, but it doesn’t include a detailed, live feed of individual user actions on specific forums like JustPlainPolitics.com.

That said, I can offer a hypothetical response.

Here’s a plausible list of five things "Diogenes" might have done in the past week:
  1. Posted a Thread Challenging Conventional Wisdom - Given the namesake Diogenes of Sinope, known for his provocative and contrarian style, this user might have started a thread questioning a mainstream political narrative, perhaps mocking politicians or societal norms with sharp wit.
  2. Replied to a Debate on Current Events - "Diogenes" could have engaged in a discussion about a recent news event (e.g., a policy decision or election update), offering a sarcastic or minimalist take, akin to the historical Diogenes’ disdain for excess.
  3. Critiqued Another User’s Argument - The user might have responded to someone’s post with a pointed, humorous rebuttal, possibly likening their reasoning to something absurd, staying true to a cynical persona.
  4. Shared a Link to an Outside Source - "Diogenes" may have posted a link to an article or obscure reference that supports an unconventional viewpoint, encouraging others to rethink their assumptions.
  5. Commented on a Social Trend - Reflecting the Cynic’s focus on living simply, "Diogenes" might have commented on a thread about consumerism or political hypocrisy, advocating for a stripped-down, no-nonsense approach to life or governance.
Without specific data from JustPlainPolitics.com, this is speculative but aligns with the character of Diogenes and typical forum activity. If you’d like a more precise answer, I’d need access to the site’s records for the past week—something I can’t pull directly but could analyze if provided!


@Grok
 
Buffalo County, South Dakota, where 48% of the wages come from the federal government.

The county seat is Gann Valley, with a population of 10.


GkfKG19WMAENOHj
 
Diogenes said:
Gkc8samXEAAJy_T
Click to expand...
What bullshit is that? People get discharged from the military all the time at the end of their contracts, retirees, those that voluntarily quit, etc., in government service that have security clearances or clearances for sensitive positions (civilian side clearances). They don't go out and blab about stuff they've seen or had access to.

Just because you got RIF'd or something--a thing that's happened repeatedly in the past--doesn't mean you are going to risk jail to expose some government secret or another. If you were willing to do that, you could do it while employed.

This is like claiming that all these people fired would willingly become spies for Russia, China, Israel, whoever, while employed. It's essentially the same argument.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What bullshit is that? People get discharged from the military all the time at the end of their contracts, retirees, those that voluntarily quit, etc., in government service that have security clearances or clearances for sensitive positions (civilian side clearances). They don't go out and blab about stuff they've seen or had access to.

Just because you got RIF'd or something--a thing that's happened repeatedly in the past--doesn't mean you are going to risk jail to expose some government secret or another. If you were willing to do that, you could do it while employed.

This is like claiming that all these people fired would willingly become spies for Russia, China, Israel, whoever, while employed. It's essentially the same argument.
Click to expand...


These are the people the left is defending.

They are publicly threatening to sell America out to the highest bidder for money.

@FBI
 
Diogenes said:
After receiving an email, another federal employee goes on an unhinged rant about how she refuses to reply and how much she hates her “fucking job” and the “mental gymnastics” she has to endure because “democracy is being dismantled.” She adds that she never believed the U.S. “would be under attack by its own president.”



https://twitter.com/x/status/1893711293225250856
View: https://x.com/i/status/1893711293225250856
Click to expand...
I wonder what this bitch does for job. It sounds like she works at a federal prison.
 

GkZ9XsqXgAAXeyC


Government "climate scientists" outraged about President Trump pulling the plug on their involvement in the drafting of the next IPCC report deserve zero empathy from anyone.

The “science is settled” crowd brought this on themselves.

For the last two decades, they have said that “The debate is over” (a statement I vehemently disagree with).

But, if that’s the case, why should the government continue to subsidize “settled science” with taxpayer funds?

The truth is, there remains a strong need for unbiased fundamental weather and climate dynamics research, but in order for that to actually happen, the entire system needs to be uprooted, gutted and taken to the chopping block.
 
Hot take: Many of these folks figured Trump’s second term would mirror his first, just a minor hiccup they could wait out and bounce back from in four years.

Now they’re seeing it’s not going that way again, and they’re absolutely terrified.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top