Some conservatives not welcome at Tea Party protests

[christiefan915]

It would be nice, but liberals never pay their bills, then they go on welfare.

I'll send you an Equifax showing my stellar credit rating.

 

[cancel2 2022]

I've never been to one. How much does yours charge you?

You probably only need a car battery and some jump leads to charge you.

 

[TuTu Monroe]

I'll send you an Equifax showing my stellar credit rating.

That would require you to give your real name and we both know that ain't gonna happen.

 

[Minister of Truth]

EPIC THREAD FAIL

 

[Taichiliberal]

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas K. Gandhi.

Did Ghandi advocate violence? Nope....but Teabaggers do.

Ghandi pushed a movement to remove a corrupt colonialist influence from his country and country's gov't.

Teabaggers suddenly decide that after 20 years of Reaganomics, they're gov't is corrupt under a fairly elected black President who didn't solve everything in one year.

Ghandi accomplished through reason, logic, religious faith and PEACEFUL resistance based solely on advocacy.

Teabaggers are divisive, threatening violence.....what will happen if Dick Armey pulls the financial plug will be real interesting.

 

[christiefan915]

That would require you to give your real name and we both know that ain't gonna happen.

Equifax knows it. That doesn't mean I can't black it out for you.

 

[Minister of Truth]

Did Ghandi advocate violence? Nope....but Teabaggers do.

Ghandi pushed a movement to remove a corrupt colonialist influence from his country and country's gov't.

Teabaggers suddenly decide that after 20 years of Reaganomics, they're gov't is corrupt under a fairly elected black President who didn't solve everything in one year.

Ghandi accomplished through reason, logic, religious faith and PEACEFUL resistance based solely on advocacy.

Teabaggers are divisive.....what will happen if Dick Armey pulls the financial plug will be real interesting.

Fuck.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Did Ghandi advocate violence? Nope....but Teabaggers do.

Ghandi pushed a movement to remove a corrupt colonialist influence from his country and country's gov't.

Teabaggers suddenly decide that after 20 years of Reaganomics, they're gov't is corrupt under a fairly elected black President who didn't solve everything in one year.

Ghandi accomplished through reason, logic, religious faith and PEACEFUL resistance based solely on advocacy.

Teabaggers are divisive.....what will happen if Dick Armey pulls the financial plug will be real interesting.

Fuck.

Agreed...the teabaggers without funding and orchestration will certainly be.

 

[Minister of Truth]

Agreed...the teabaggers without funding and orchestration will certainly be.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Agreed...the teabaggers without funding and orchestration will certainly be.

THE TEABAGGERS DRINK OF CHOICE!

 

[DamnYankee]

Did Ghandi advocate violence? Nope....but Teabaggers do.

Ghandi pushed a movement to remove a corrupt colonialist influence from his country and country's gov't.

Teabaggers suddenly decide that after 20 years of Reaganomics, they're gov't is corrupt under a fairly elected black President who didn't solve everything in one year.

Ghandi accomplished through reason, logic, religious faith and PEACEFUL resistance based solely on advocacy.

Teabaggers are divisive, threatening violence.....what will happen if Dick Armey pulls the financial plug will be real interesting.

There you go playing the race card again Libby. Its getting old.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Did Ghandi advocate violence? Nope....but Teabaggers do.

Ghandi pushed a movement to remove a corrupt colonialist influence from his country and country's gov't.

Teabaggers suddenly decide that after 20 years of Reaganomics, they're gov't is corrupt under a fairly elected black President who didn't solve everything in one year.

Ghandi accomplished through reason, logic, religious faith and PEACEFUL resistance based solely on advocacy.

Teabaggers are divisive, threatening violence.....what will happen if Dick Armey pulls the financial plug will be real interesting.

There you go playing the race card again Libby. Its getting old.

Hey, when you can magically erase all the documented racist bullshit being spewed by your teabagging, birther, oather, neocon pundit buddies about Obama, then you may have a case. Until then, blow it out your ass. You can't refute or disprove my statement above.

 

[DamnYankee]

Our unwanteds never sunk to the depths of those in the article.

William J. Jefferson
Gerry Studds

 

[DamnYankee]

Hey, when you can magically erase all the documented racist bullshit being spewed by your teabagging, birther, oather, neocon pundit buddies about Obama, then you may have a case. Until then, blow it out your ass. You can't refute or disprove my statement above.

Do you have a list of words that those who oppose the black president can say without you calling them racist? By reading your posts over the last few months I'm quite sure that it is a shorter list then the terms that we shouldn't use.

But I'd like to see either!

 

[Mott the Hoople]

What is the big deal of not wanting certain people to speak out at an organization's events? Political organizations organize around a set of political philosophies and principles. If someone's expressed views do not fit within the philosophies and principles of the organization, WHY would said organization WANT them to be a speaker at one of the organization's events? It makes ZERO sense to have a speaker at an event whose views do not fit with the organization.

There is not an organization in the WORLD, especially a political one, who would invite a speaker whose views were contrary to, or outside of the views of the organization (unless the purpose of the event were to debate an issue.). That goes for republicans groups, democratic party groups, liberal groups, conservative groups, groups based on gender, race, creed, or even taste in music.

In short, all we have here is a bunch of frightened whiny puss heads trying to invent a mole hill so they can build it into a mountain.

Well that would begger the question. Why were they invited to speak in the first place?

 

[christiefan915]

William J. Jefferson
Gerry Studds

Mark Foley
Ted Stevens
Tom DeLay

 

[DamnYankee]

Mark Foley
Ted Stevens
Tom DeLay

unlike you dems, we cull our unwanteds.

Thanks for verifying.

 

[WinterBorn]

What is the big deal of not wanting certain people to speak out at an organization's events? Political organizations organize around a set of political philosophies and principles. If someone's expressed views do not fit within the philosophies and principles of the organization, WHY would said organization WANT them to be a speaker at one of the organization's events? It makes ZERO sense to have a speaker at an event whose views do not fit with the organization.

There is not an organization in the WORLD, especially a political one, who would invite a speaker whose views were contrary to, or outside of the views of the organization (unless the purpose of the event were to debate an issue.). That goes for republicans groups, democratic party groups, liberal groups, conservative groups, groups based on gender, race, creed, or even taste in music.

In short, all we have here is a bunch of frightened whiny puss heads trying to invent a mole hill so they can build it into a mountain.

If that is the case, then when the Tea Party group in north Alabam and the one in Tennessee invited Roy Moore to be a keynote speaker, they were espousing his views and accepting him (and his views) as part of their platform?

Funny, I thought the Tea Party was all about being constitutional.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Do you have a list of words that those who oppose the black president can say without you calling them racist? By reading your posts over the last few months I'm quite sure that it is a shorter list then the terms that we shouldn't use.

But I'd like to see either!

Take off the blinders and listen to something other than Fox News:

This was easy to find, as was this. I find the similarity to what this bozo Williams says and what you and other neocon/teabagger/birther/oather/etc. parrots have printed on these boards fascinating:

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/anderson-cooper-brings-racist-tea-bagger-mark

 

[DamnYankee]

Take off the blinders and listen to something other than Fox News:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S38VioxnBaI

This was easy to find, as was this. I find the similarity to what this bozo Williams says and what you and other neocon/teabagger/birther/oather/etc. parrots have printed on these boards fascinating:

http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/anderson-cooper-brings-racist-tea-bagger-mark

Heere's what I got out of your link, Libbie:

COOPER: But, Roland, there are people who will say, well, look, in past years, and under President Bush, we saw people demonstrating, showing signs saying President Bush was a Nazi, saying he was a fascist. Why is this any different?

MARTIN: Because you also look at the level of criticism.

So basically, we are racist if we are more critical of the black president than liberals were of Bush. Is that your position?