Elon Musk father says Michelle Obama IS A MAN

You posted the screenshot, Jesus jagoff.

You said it was from Grok, Christ cumslut.

You lied.

Own it.
I did indeed post a screenshot, taken from Grok's response.

You then showed you don't understand even basic element inspection and inspected a webpage and saw 'infowars' on it and assumed that magically meant my screenshot somehow came from infowars (you still can't show where on infowars it supposedly came from). And now, when challenged to grow a fucking pair of balls instead of being a tranny dickless cumdumpster, and provide a screenshot showing what that element shows and what that infowars hyperlink shows (because you know it will show the OP link), you continue to be a little pussy and show that you can't back your bullshit up.
 
That's not true.

Bar Exams in 17 states use race, gender, and other factors as modifiers to "assist" underrepresented groups.

DEI is everywhere. White persecution is eveywhere.
 
Except it wasn't.

It's Sunday. Instead of lying, shouldn't you be on your knees doing what your savior commands; "this is my body, take, and eat"?

Be sure to swallow! :thup:
Except it was. And here it is again, just for you, with my dark mode on (I even circled the relevant part for your dumb fuckface).
aScreenshot 2025-02-16 120442.png


Now, put up or shut up, bitch, show me you inspecting the element and clicking on the infowars tab. Lets see it you cowardly whore.
 
Grock is fucking retarded, and makes shit up.


Yet you claimed it was true, didn't you, Christ's cock-holster?

BTW, Grok does not make things up.

Does Grok make things up?

"No, I am designed to provide accurate information based on my training data. However, if I don't know something or if there's information I can't access, I'll let you know rather than making something up.


AI systems, including those like me, have inherent limitations in accuracy due to several factors:

  1. Training Data Quality:
    • Bias: If the training data contains biases, the AI will replicate these biases in its outputs. This could be due to under-representation or over-representation of certain groups or viewpoints in the data.
    • Errors: Mistakes or inaccuracies in the training data can lead to incorrect learning, resulting in erroneous outputs.
  2. Data Scope and Currency:
    • Limited Scope: AI is only as good as the data it has been trained on. If an AI hasn't been exposed to certain types of information or if its training data is outdated, its answers will be limited or incorrect regarding new or specialized topics.
    • Real-Time Data: Many AI models don't have real-time access to the latest information unless they are specifically designed to do so, which can limit their accuracy on current events or rapidly changing information.
  3. Complexity of Human Language and Context:
    • Ambiguity: Human language often involves ambiguity, sarcasm, idioms, or cultural references that AI might not fully understand or interpret correctly.
    • Contextual Understanding: AI might struggle with context, especially in nuanced or multi-layered conversations, leading to inaccuracies.
  4. Algorithmic Limitations:
    • Overfitting or Underfitting: If an AI model is too tailored to its training data (overfitting), it might not generalize well to new data. Conversely, if it’s too general (underfitting), it might not provide accurate answers for specific queries.
    • Model Complexity: Simpler models might not capture complex patterns, while very complex models might be computationally expensive or difficult to interpret.
  5. Interpretation of Outputs:
    • Probabilistic Nature: Many AI models, particularly those using neural networks, provide answers based on probability. This means there's always a chance of error, especially with less common scenarios or questions.
  6. External Factors:
    • Hardware and Software: The performance of the AI can vary based on the computing resources available, and software bugs can introduce errors.
    • Security: AI systems can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks where inputs are specifically crafted to mislead the system.
  7. Ethical and Legal Boundaries:
    • Privacy: AI systems might not provide accurate or complete information if it involves personal data due to privacy laws or ethical considerations.
    • Compliance: Legal regulations might restrict how AI can process or present information, potentially affecting accuracy.

To mitigate these issues, ongoing research focuses on improving training data, model architecture, and the interpretability of AI systems. Users of AI should always approach outputs with a degree of skepticism and cross-verify information, especially in critical scenarios where accuracy is paramount. If you're looking for the most accurate and current information, I can suggest doing a web search when necessary."



@Grok
 
Again, you've now been given two different screenshots of your boy Grok stating she is married.

Now since you showed you could indeed still screenshot I await your screenshot of you inspecting that weblink and showing us where it directs to, in order to prove I magically got something from infowars.


The image you linked does not directly indicate that it was generated by Grok. However, posts on X (formerly Twitter) mention images being marked or noted as "generated by Grok" when they are indeed AI-generated by Grok. Without specific metadata or a clear indication from the source, it's not possible to confirm if this image was created by Grok.

If you need to verify the origin of this image further, I suggest checking for any digital watermarks, image metadata, or statements from the uploader on the Just Plain Politics forum, as such details could provide clues about its origin. If you want, we can do a search to see if there are any more explicit mentions or claims about this image's origin.


@Grok

Grok just fucked you in the ass. Will Jesus be jealous?
 
Yet you claimed it was true, didn't you, Christ's cock-holster?
No, I said, and I quote, "Your buddy Grok disagrees". Then you proceeded to have a meltdown and go on a tangent of ignorant element inspection where you thought the OP's infowars link was somehow related to my screenshot.
BTW, Grok does not make things up.

Does Grok make things up?

"No, I am designed to provide accurate information based on my training data. However, if I don't know something or if there's information I can't access, I'll let you know rather than making something up.


AI systems, including those like me, have inherent limitations in accuracy due to several factors:

  1. Training Data Quality:
    • Bias: If the training data contains biases, the AI will replicate these biases in its outputs. This could be due to under-representation or over-representation of certain groups or viewpoints in the data.
    • Errors: Mistakes or inaccuracies in the training data can lead to incorrect learning, resulting in erroneous outputs.
  2. Data Scope and Currency:
    • Limited Scope: AI is only as good as the data it has been trained on. If an AI hasn't been exposed to certain types of information or if its training data is outdated, its answers will be limited or incorrect regarding new or specialized topics.
    • Real-Time Data: Many AI models don't have real-time access to the latest information unless they are specifically designed to do so, which can limit their accuracy on current events or rapidly changing information.
  3. Complexity of Human Language and Context:
    • Ambiguity: Human language often involves ambiguity, sarcasm, idioms, or cultural references that AI might not fully understand or interpret correctly.
    • Contextual Understanding: AI might struggle with context, especially in nuanced or multi-layered conversations, leading to inaccuracies.
  4. Algorithmic Limitations:
    • Overfitting or Underfitting: If an AI model is too tailored to its training data (overfitting), it might not generalize well to new data. Conversely, if it’s too general (underfitting), it might not provide accurate answers for specific queries.
    • Model Complexity: Simpler models might not capture complex patterns, while very complex models might be computationally expensive or difficult to interpret.
  5. Interpretation of Outputs:
    • Probabilistic Nature: Many AI models, particularly those using neural networks, provide answers based on probability. This means there's always a chance of error, especially with less common scenarios or questions.
  6. External Factors:
    • Hardware and Software: The performance of the AI can vary based on the computing resources available, and software bugs can introduce errors.
    • Security: AI systems can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks where inputs are specifically crafted to mislead the system.
  7. Ethical and Legal Boundaries:
    • Privacy: AI systems might not provide accurate or complete information if it involves personal data due to privacy laws or ethical considerations.
    • Compliance: Legal regulations might restrict how AI can process or present information, potentially affecting accuracy.

To mitigate these issues, ongoing research focuses on improving training data, model architecture, and the interpretability of AI systems. Users of AI should always approach outputs with a degree of skepticism and cross-verify information, especially in critical scenarios where accuracy is paramount. If you're looking for the most accurate and current information, I can suggest doing a web search when necessary."



@Grok
We literally have in-thread evidence that grok makes things up, but sure, ask the thing that makes things up if it makes things up, I'm sure it won't make up an answer. You really are a smoothbrained cumdumpster aren't you?
 
No, I said, and I quote, "Your buddy Grok disagrees". Then you proceeded to have a meltdown and go on a tangent of ignorant element inspection where you thought the OP's infowars link was somehow related to my screenshot.
We literally have in-thread evidence that grok makes things up, but sure, ask the thing that makes things up if it makes things up, I'm sure it won't make up an answer. You really are a smoothbrained cumdumpster aren't you?


Keep backpedaling. :thup:
 
The image you linked does not directly indicate that it was generated by Grok. However, posts on X (formerly Twitter) mention images being marked or noted as "generated by Grok" when they are indeed AI-generated by Grok. Without specific metadata or a clear indication from the source, it's not possible to confirm if this image was created by Grok.

If you need to verify the origin of this image further, I suggest checking for any digital watermarks, image metadata, or statements from the uploader on the Just Plain Politics forum, as such details could provide clues about its origin. If you want, we can do a search to see if there are any more explicit mentions or claims about this image's origin.


@Grok

Grok just fucked you in the ass. Will Jesus be jealous?
Hahhahahahaha, Grok just claimed the same thing about your screenshot above
 

"Elon Musk father says Michelle Obama IS A MAN"...TDAK​


Well, we know one thing.
You, goyboy, and Elon Musk certainly aren't.
 
So you say.
So your boy Grok says:




Was this image generated by Grok or is it a fake? https://www.justplainpolitics.com/attachments/1739734381587-png.43709/


13 web pages
Based on the available information from posts on X, similar images have been identified as fakes or AI-generated, with some users specifically mentioning a "Grok" logo or stamp indicating AI generation. However, without directly viewing the image, I can't definitively confirm whether this specific image was generated by me or if it's a fake. If you can see a "Grok" logo or stamp on the image, it would suggest it was indeed generated by me. If not, or if there's no clear indication, it might be a fake or generated by another AI. For conclusive verification, you would need to check for any visible signs like watermarks or specific AI generation indicators.

1Screenshot 2025-01-09 200358.png
 
So your boy Grok says:




Was this image generated by Grok or is it a fake? https://www.justplainpolitics.com/attachments/1739734381587-png.43709/


13 web pages
Based on the available information from posts on X, similar images have been identified as fakes or AI-generated, with some users specifically mentioning a "Grok" logo or stamp indicating AI generation. However, without directly viewing the image, I can't definitively confirm whether this specific image was generated by me or if it's a fake. If you can see a "Grok" logo or stamp on the image, it would suggest it was indeed generated by me. If not, or if there's no clear indication, it might be a fake or generated by another AI. For conclusive verification, you would need to check for any visible signs like watermarks or specific AI generation indicators.

View attachment 43720


If you can see a "Grok" logo or stamp on the image, it would suggest it was indeed generated by me.


@Grok
 
Back
Top