Holding of Wong Kim Ark

What does that have to do with birthright citizenship? Do illegal aliens have squatter's rights? Besides, squatter's rights are a state issue, not a federal one. Immigration is a federal issue.
you are attempting to provide a single definition of 'resident' within the context of your denial of birthright citizenship, so i'm attempting to get you to understand that you cannot use a single definition of 'resident' because there are different contexts and meanings in it's application

So, a person, legal or illegal, can be domiciled and resident in an area, state, county, home, or even a cave, thus making them subject to the jurisdiction of several government entities
 
you are attempting to provide a single definition of 'resident' within the context of your denial of birthright citizenship, so i'm attempting to get you to understand that you cannot use a single definition of 'resident' because there are different contexts and meanings in it's application
That's actually what you are attempting to do. With regard to the legal context of the word "resident", there is only one. Why do you think the term " resident alien" exists? That's what green card holders are termed. As well as certain non immigrant visa holders. An illegal alien does not lawfully hold resident status.
So, a person, legal or illegal, can be domiciled and resident in an area, state, county, home, or even a cave, thus making them subject to the jurisdiction of several government entities
This is simply not true.
 
“A child born in the United States, of parents of foreign descent, who are domiciled and resident in the United States, and not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under a foreign government, becomes at the time of birth a citizen of the United States.”

- Wong Kim Ark, majority opinion by justice Horace Gray
That's not what the 14th amendment says dipshit.

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
 
What does it mean to reside?
Reside isn't in the Constitution. Why make irrelevant arguments?

What do you think "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" means?

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
 
So giving incredible powers to the unelected, unvetted Musk is how you stay loyal to the Constitution?

No one has given Musk ANY power. He can only investigate and advise. Trump has that power and will use it.

Try thinking for yourself instead of parroting lame moronic Democrat talking points like a fucking brainless lemming.

Defying the courts and threatening judges is patriotic?

Who said they were? But you didn't cry when Biden and Democrats defied the courts and threatened Supreme Court Justices. You brainless hypocrite.

You are on the bad guys side and are not smart enough to realize it

Another asinine statement from a lying leftist ass. You mental cases can't help yourselves. :palm:
 
The Court in Wong Kim Ark answered that.
Wrong. They did not. I wish you were as smart as you think you are. But that case has nothing to do with illegals coming into the country by breaking our laws and then plopping a baby here.

:eyeroll:
 
You are incorrect. Thats ok.
You don't believe this will end up in the Supreme Court and the original language clarified? Moronic.

Name any other country that allows non-citizens to drop babies in their country and make them automatic citizens.
 
you are attempting to provide a single definition of 'resident' within the context of your denial of birthright citizenship, so i'm attempting to get you to understand that you cannot use a single definition of 'resident' because there are different contexts and meanings in it's application

So, a person, legal or illegal, can be domiciled and resident in an area, state, county, home, or even a cave, thus making them subject to the jurisdiction of several government entities
Wrong. Jarod is the only idiot trying to make that asinine argument.
 
“A child born in the United States, of parents of foreign descent, who are domiciled and resident in the United States, and not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under a foreign government, becomes at the time of birth a citizen of the United States.”

- Wong Kim Ark, majority opinion by justice Horace Gray
Ark's parents were both permanently legally in the US. Elk V Wilkins ruled an AMERICAN INDIAN that was born within the US was not a US Citizen because he owed his allegiance to the Sovereign Indian nation Where his parents were permanent legal citizens. Illegal Aliens cannot have a legal US citizen.

  • "Domicile" is a legal term that refers to a person's permanent residence. It's the place where a person intends to return and remain, even if they're currently living elsewhere.
Illegal Aliens are not Domiciled in the US because it is not their permanent residence. Homan is sending them home.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top