Why should the Dept. of Education be retained?

T. A. Gardner

Thread Killer
We've all heard that the Trump administration might get rid of the Department of Education in its entirety. There are arguments, mostly from the Left and teachers' unions, to keep it open and funded.

A lot of the discussion has been over why it should be disestablished. I'd like to know what the arguments for keeping it funded and running are, and how those are justified.
 
We've all heard that the Trump administration might get rid of the Department of Education in its entirety. There are arguments, mostly from the Left and teachers' unions, to keep it open and funded.

A lot of the discussion has been over why it should be disestablished. I'd like to know what the arguments for keeping it funded and running are, and how those are justified.
Education is a national resource and should have a central point of coordination for quality.

Additionally, as Reagan once stated, our nation's youth are our nation's greatest resource. Maximizing the education of all them is the best way to provide a wealth of educated workers and military personnel.
 
Example:

In 1985, he made it clear: the future of America rested in the hands of its youth, and their potential was worth celebrating.
 
We've all heard that the Trump administration might get rid of the Department of Education in its entirety. There are arguments, mostly from the Left and teachers' unions, to keep it open and funded.

A lot of the discussion has been over why it should be disestablished. I'd like to know what the arguments for keeping it funded and running are, and how those are justified.
As it exists now there's no argument to keep it funded and running... And if Randy Weingarten wants it to stay open that's the best reason ever for it to be retired...
 
Example:

In 1985, he made it clear: the future of America rested in the hands of its youth, and their potential was worth celebrating.

Is this the thread where you put your Johnson where your perverted mouth is, Dutchy ?

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic. Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post #146
 
As it exists now there's no argument to keep it funded and running... And if Randy Weingarten wants it to stay open that's the best reason ever for it to be retired...
The final nail in Top's coffin that proves she was never a teacher and actually hates them...meaning her sister, the real teacher in the family.
 
Education is a national resource and should have a central point of coordination for quality.

Except, since the DoEd was formed, the quality of education in the US has steadily declined. So, it fails on that issue completely.
Additionally, as Reagan once stated, our nation's youth are our nation's greatest resource. Maximizing the education of all them is the best way to provide a wealth of educated workers and military personnel.

That's not a reason, it's an irrelevant appeal to emotion, e. g., "It's for the children!" That's followed by a non sequitur.
 
Is this the thread where you put your Johnson where your perverted mouth is, Dutchy ?

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic. Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post #146
I have no idea what that means, dear. Can you rephrase, please.

Just how long has it been since you've been with a man, Ms. Moon?
 
Except, since the DoEd was formed, the quality of education in the US has steadily declined. So, it fails on that issue completely.


That's not a reason, it's an irrelevant appeal to emotion, e. g., "It's for the children!" That's followed by a non sequitur.
Are you blaming that solely on the DOE? What about the fact that Republicans have consistently undermined education in the US for 30 years? Or that 92% of educational funding is local? IOWs, poor states have poorer schools? Guess which states those are, Terry?

Although the data in this is 15 years old, I strongly doubt it's changed much except for getting worse.

Example: https://www.syncopate.us/articles/2009/f03a
US2008HS.gif
 
I have no idea what that means, dear. Can you rephrase, please.

Just how long has it been since you've been with a man, Ms. Moon?

You're on the run, pimp- and that's where your going to remain until you cover your boasts, you sick apology for a male.

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic. Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post #146
 
We've all heard that the Trump administration might get rid of the Department of Education in its entirety. There are arguments, mostly from the Left and teachers' unions, to keep it open and funded.

A lot of the discussion has been over why it should be disestablished. I'd like to know what the arguments for keeping it funded and running are, and how those are justified.
I can't come up with any.

I wouldn't be surprised if DOGE finds that a hefty chunk of this money isn't going towards any domestically located education of any sort.
 
Are you blaming that solely on the DOE? What about the fact that Republicans have consistently undermined education in the US for 30 years? Or that 92% of educational funding is local? IOWs, poor states have poorer schools? Guess which states those are, Terry?

Although the data in this is 15 years old, I strongly doubt it's changed much except for getting worse.

Example: https://www.syncopate.us/articles/2009/f03a
US2008HS.gif
To take one state that demolishes your entire argument, and there are plenty of others, it's Arizona. Your map shows Arizona ranked 19th in quality of high schools. Yet, Arizona consistently ranks 48th, or 49th in education funding. There is no correlation between spending on education and outcomes.

Many of the shittiest school districts with the worst outcomes are in deep blue states.



A more accurate determinant of poor student and school performance is that the school is located in a poor district and the students live in poverty or in a single-parent--usually female adult--household.
 
You're on the run, pimp- and that's where your going to remain until you cover your boasts, you sick apology for a male.

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic. Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post #146
So you can't explain it either. No worries, dear. I know English is a second language for you and Google has its limits.
 
So you can't explain it either. No worries, dear. I know English is a second language for you and Google has its limits.
Stand up, you perverted pimp. Your crawling is nauseating. Get on with it;

moon said:
You must think that the forum enjoys your Achilles' dick posts.

Dutch Uncle said;
Yes, many do, Ms. Moon. They might enjoy seeing your hairy tits too. Send me a pic and I'll send you a dick pic.

Deal?

https://justplainpolitics.com/threa...s-would-be-to-blame-if-he-loses.221646/page-8 Post

#146
 
To take one state that demolishes your entire argument, and there are plenty of others, it's Arizona. Your map shows Arizona ranked 19th in quality of high schools. Yet, Arizona consistently ranks 48th, or 49th in education funding. There is no correlation between spending on education and outcomes.

Many of the shittiest school districts with the worst outcomes are in deep blue states.



A more accurate determinant of poor student and school performance is that the school is located in a poor district and the students live in poverty or in a single-parent--usually female adult--household.
States can vary between rich and poor areas. If you want to use Arizona as an example, break it down by county, tax rates and average income.

The bottom line is that schools, teachers, books and transportation cost money. Cities can use organic public transportation systems, but rural areas are stuck with buses and bus driver salaries. Less money means less services. It's not rocket science.
 
Back
Top