Birth Right Citizenship Will It Finally End?

Tobytone said:
No shit, do you think the SC just starts making decisions when they're bored? LOL. The problem didn't exist until recently. And don't throw the 1898 case at me again, I've addressed that, and one little inconvenient detail about that case was that the little feller's parents were here LEGALLY.

So, that detail, along with the fact that the court was full of activists who didn't know that racist policies were not part of the Constitution, should be noted. Birthright citizenship became a real problem in the '90s when we all started talking about it. Those with common sense and compassion for the innocent, vulnerable Mexicans who were being exploited by the Cartels, and still are, thought we should do something about it.

Trump just happens to be the first President with the balls to challenge the absurd, evil, and misguided interpretation of the Amendment. So, hopefully, this court will actually stick to the known intent of the Amendment and do the right thing.
Click to expand...
The Supreme Court is actually compelled to do the right thing, assuming they want to honor the Constitution.
 
archives said:
Not propaganda, fact, Jefferson openly admitted he was in error when he purchased Louisiana, did you skip history in high school
Click to expand...
Jefferson was a strict constructionist. Cleary, you are rewriting history when you claim he dumped constructionism early on.
 
Bigdog said:
Jefferson was a strict constructionist. Cleary, you are rewriting history when you claim he dumped constructionism early on.
Click to expand...
Hardly, being a strict constructionist he saw there existed no provision in the Constitution that a President could purchase land from a foreign nation (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-louisiana-purchase-jeffersons-constitutional-gamble). However he did recognize the value to the country and as all know, purchase the land. And this is not the only example on how he swayed from being a strict constructionist
 
archives said:
Not propaganda, fact, Jefferson openly admitted he was in error when he purchased Louisiana, did you skip history in high school
Click to expand...
Hilarious, like you didn't run to google to find a website with 'expert' answers to help your ignorance on the subject remain hidden. What's your source of the non-existing admission from Jefferson?
 
archives said:
Hardly, being a strict constructionist he saw there existed no provision in the Constitution that a President could purchase land from a foreign nation (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-louisiana-purchase-jeffersons-constitutional-gamble). However he did recognize the value to the country and as all know, purchase the land. And this is not the only example on how he swayed from being a strict constructionist
Click to expand...
So you admit he was a strict constructionist and that you lied when you said he was not.

The purchase was ruled constitutional in 1823.
 
archives said:
Hardly, being a strict constructionist he saw there existed no provision in the Constitution that a President could purchase land from a foreign nation (https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/the-louisiana-purchase-jeffersons-constitutional-gamble). However he did recognize the value to the country and as all know, purchase the land. And this is not the only example on how he swayed from being a strict constructionist
Click to expand...
Not quite there yet homie. Why not just come out with the truth?
 
Bigdog said:
So you admit he was a strict constructionist and that you lied when you said he was not.

The purchase was ruled constitutional in 1823.
Click to expand...
Laughable, after being proven wrong the “big chiwawa” wants to play a semantics game

Well, he’s wrong again, my actual comment was “even Jefferson dumped the strict constructionist view of the Constitution early,” meaning he was a strict constructionist but abandoned that position early

Two swings and misses in a row, want to try to strike out
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top