John Roberts Absurdly Suggests the Supreme Court Has No ‘Political Bias’

signalmankenneth

Verified User
Coming from John Roberts who may be the worst Chief Justice in Supreme Court History!

The chief justice bashed “public officials” who criticize judges for their partisan rulings “without a credible basis for such allegations”

In his first term as president, Donald Trump built a conservative 6-3 supermajority on the Supreme Court. Ever since, the nation’s highest court has repeatedly issued increasingly extreme, far-right decisions on topics of abortion, race, the environment, corruption, and much more.

The Supreme Court has eliminated federal protections for abortion rights; limited the federal government’s ability to regulate carbon emissions, protect Americans’ drinking water, and limit ozone pollution; gutted federal agencies’ ability to implement regulations generally; opened up long-standing regulations to new challenges; made it easier for states to enact racial gerrymanders; eliminated college affirmative action policies; found businesses can discriminate against LGBTQ+ customers; permitted public school employees to lead students in prayer; decided that companies can pay public officials gratuities, or thank-you payments, for corrupt contracting decisions; and broadly shielded Trump from criminal prosecution for any so-called official acts he committed as president.

Trump is so proud of the conservatives on the court that he frequently praised the justices, individually by name, at 2024 campaign events — thanking them for their “courage” in deciding to overturn Roe v. Wade so states could ban abortion. At a September rally, Trump called the conservative justices “very brave” and argued that “people should be put in jail” for criticizing them.

The Supreme Court’s chief justice, John Roberts, is now echoing Trump’s demand that people stop criticizing him, his colleagues, and other federal jurists — while continuing to pretend that judges are not political.

In his annual end-of-year report, issued on Tuesday, Roberts wrote that public officials (read: Democrats) “regrettably have engaged in recent attempts to intimidate judges — for example, suggesting political bias in the judge’s adverse rulings without a credible basis for such allegations.” Roberts added, “Public officials certainly have a right to criticize the work of the judiciary, but they should be mindful that intemperance in their statements when it comes to judges may prompt dangerous reactions by others.”

The idea that Democrats have sought to intimidate the justices is laughable — save for a few lonely voices, they have said shockingly little and done nothing to attempt to rein in the court’s ongoing right-wing rampage. While Democrats have called out conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito for failing to disclose, in apparent violation of federal ethics rules, luxury travel provided by right-wing billionaires, they ultimately did nothing about that either.

Roberts — who reportedly drove the court’s far-reaching decision in the Trump immunity case — has long pretended to be an apolitical actor, who would simply call “balls and strikes” as a jurist.

It’s a ridiculous notion: Supreme Court justices — and federal judges generally — are political appointees. But since he was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed in 2005, Roberts has overseen the court’s dramatic right-wing shift — which has been further turbocharged by Trump’s appointments of Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. The Supreme Court is the most conservative it’s been in nearly a century.

This is no accident: Roberts and his conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court were all selected and confirmed with support from right-wing dark-money interests — ultimately, with funding from some of the same people who have gifted the conservative justices undisclosed private jet rides and superyacht trips, given them lucrative teaching gigs, and steered consulting payments to at least one justice’s spouse.

Roberts and his colleagues were appointed to the Supreme Court to carry out a conservative political agenda — and that’s exactly what they have done. No one should pretend otherwise.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...erts-supreme-court-political-bias-1235223174/


1735923134951.png
MAGA Supreme Court justices trying to destroy our democracy:mad:
 
Coming from John Roberts who may be the worst Chief Justice in Supreme Court History!

The chief justice bashed “public officials” who criticize judges for their partisan rulings “without a credible basis for such allegations”

In his first term as president, Donald Trump built a conservative 6-3 supermajority on the Supreme Court. Ever since, the nation’s highest court has repeatedly issued increasingly extreme, far-right decisions on topics of abortion, race, the environment, corruption, and much more.

The Supreme Court has eliminated federal protections for abortion rights; limited the federal government’s ability to regulate carbon emissions, protect Americans’ drinking water, and limit ozone pollution; gutted federal agencies’ ability to implement regulations generally; opened up long-standing regulations to new challenges; made it easier for states to enact racial gerrymanders; eliminated college affirmative action policies; found businesses can discriminate against LGBTQ+ customers; permitted public school employees to lead students in prayer; decided that companies can pay public officials gratuities, or thank-you payments, for corrupt contracting decisions; and broadly shielded Trump from criminal prosecution for any so-called official acts he committed as president.

Trump is so proud of the conservatives on the court that he frequently praised the justices, individually by name, at 2024 campaign events — thanking them for their “courage” in deciding to overturn Roe v. Wade so states could ban abortion. At a September rally, Trump called the conservative justices “very brave” and argued that “people should be put in jail” for criticizing them.

The Supreme Court’s chief justice, John Roberts, is now echoing Trump’s demand that people stop criticizing him, his colleagues, and other federal jurists — while continuing to pretend that judges are not political.

In his annual end-of-year report, issued on Tuesday, Roberts wrote that public officials (read: Democrats) “regrettably have engaged in recent attempts to intimidate judges — for example, suggesting political bias in the judge’s adverse rulings without a credible basis for such allegations.” Roberts added, “Public officials certainly have a right to criticize the work of the judiciary, but they should be mindful that intemperance in their statements when it comes to judges may prompt dangerous reactions by others.”

The idea that Democrats have sought to intimidate the justices is laughable — save for a few lonely voices, they have said shockingly little and done nothing to attempt to rein in the court’s ongoing right-wing rampage. While Democrats have called out conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito for failing to disclose, in apparent violation of federal ethics rules, luxury travel provided by right-wing billionaires, they ultimately did nothing about that either.

Roberts — who reportedly drove the court’s far-reaching decision in the Trump immunity case — has long pretended to be an apolitical actor, who would simply call “balls and strikes” as a jurist.

It’s a ridiculous notion: Supreme Court justices — and federal judges generally — are political appointees. But since he was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed in 2005, Roberts has overseen the court’s dramatic right-wing shift — which has been further turbocharged by Trump’s appointments of Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. The Supreme Court is the most conservative it’s been in nearly a century.

This is no accident: Roberts and his conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court were all selected and confirmed with support from right-wing dark-money interests — ultimately, with funding from some of the same people who have gifted the conservative justices undisclosed private jet rides and superyacht trips, given them lucrative teaching gigs, and steered consulting payments to at least one justice’s spouse.

Roberts and his colleagues were appointed to the Supreme Court to carry out a conservative political agenda — and that’s exactly what they have done. No one should pretend otherwise.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...erts-supreme-court-political-bias-1235223174/


View attachment 39358
MAGA Supreme Court justices trying to destroy our democracy:mad:
The good news is that he's speaking out against MAGA. IMO, he's also trying to remind his own court of their duties and oath without condemning them directly.
 
Coming from John Roberts who may be the worst Chief Justice in Supreme Court History!
Hmmmm, let's see here:

John Roberts --- Wildcard (goes back and forth)
Clarence Thomas --- Constitutionalist (almost always)
Samuel Alito --- Constitutionalist (for the most part)
Sonia Sotomayor --- Marxist (effectively always)
Elena Kagan --- Marxist (effectively always)
Neil Gorsuch --- Constitutionalist (often enough)
Brett Cavanaugh --- Constitutionalist (more often than not)
Amy Coney Barrett --- Wildcard (goes back and forth)
Ketanji Brown Jackson --- Marxist (effectively always)

So, by my count, that's 2 fairly strong constitutionalists ("conservatives"), 2 weaker-kneed constitutionalists ("conservative-lite"), 2 "wildcards", and 3 marxists ("libtards")
 
Roberts certainly lives in a illusionary reality, guess he forgot about upside down flags and sugar daddy benefactors

Ever since Mitch made the Court a majority vote it lost it’s nonpartisan reputation
When I was an airline pilot safety rep remained apolitical since safety shouldn't involve politics between airline management and union elected-leadership. The inside joke was "We (meaning Safety) don't get involved in management/union politics. We have our own politics". LOL

I suspect that is what Roberts is doing here. He's not an idiot and he certainly recognizes the problems with Alito and Thomas. What he's doing, IMO, is reminding both others and, mainly, his own court, that SCOTUS should do as the Founders intended and remain apolitical, abide by their oaths and to discharge their duties as they swore to do.
 
Hmmmm, let's see here:

John Roberts --- Wildcard (goes back and forth)
Clarence Thomas --- Constitutionalist (almost always)
Samuel Alito --- Constitutionalist (for the most part)
Sonia Sotomayor --- Marxist (effectively always)
Elena Kagan --- Marxist (effectively always)
Neil Gorsuch --- Constitutionalist (often enough)
Brett Cavanaugh --- Constitutionalist (more often than not)
Amy Coney Barrett --- Wildcard (goes back and forth)
Ketanji Brown Jackson --- Marxist (effectively always)

So, by my count, that's 2 fairly strong constitutionalists ("conservatives"), 2 weaker-kneed constitutionalists ("conservative-lite"), 2 "wildcards", and 3 marxists ("libtards")
If you are assuming Textualism and Originalism, the principles supposedly the GOP Justices you listed swear by, implies “constitutionalist” you are either naive or uninformed

Best example being the immunity bullshit, as even Thomas noted, nowhere in the Constitution or any federal statute does it even faintly imply that a President has immunity, but that didn’t stop Thomas nor the other hacks from doing exactly what Trump wanted them to do
 
When I was an airline pilot safety rep remained apolitical since safety shouldn't involve politics between airline management and union elected-leadership. The inside joke was "We (meaning Safety) don't get involved in management/union politics. We have our own politics". LOL

I suspect that is what Roberts is doing here. He's not an idiot and he certainly recognizes the problems with Alito and Thomas. What he's doing, IMO, is reminding both others and, mainly, his own court, that SCOTUS should do as the Founders intended and remain apolitical, abide by their oaths and to discharge their duties as they swore to do.
That would be true if it were a decade or so ago, but Roberts has sat and watched it all developed right in front of him and said little
 
When I was an airline pilot safety rep remained apolitical since safety shouldn't involve politics between airline management and union elected-leadership. The inside joke was "We (meaning Safety) don't get involved in management/union politics. We have our own politics". LOL

I suspect that is what Roberts is doing here. He's not an idiot and he certainly recognizes the problems with Alito and Thomas. What he's doing, IMO, is reminding both others and, mainly, his own court, that SCOTUS should do as the Founders intended and remain apolitical, abide by their oaths and to discharge their duties as they swore to do.
I also think that Roberts lost control of the court and his main goal now is to protect his image for posterity.
 
If you are assuming Textualism and Originalism, the principles supposedly the GOP Justices you listed swear by, implies “constitutionalist” you are either naive or uninformed
I didn't list any "GOP" Justices.
Best example being the immunity bullshit, as even Thomas noted, nowhere in the Constitution or any federal statute does it even faintly imply that a President has immunity, but that didn’t stop Thomas nor the other hacks from doing exactly what Trump wanted them to do
What do you mean by "has immunity"? Regarding WHAT?
 
I also think that Roberts lost control of the court and his main goal now is to protect his image for posterity.
I'm not sure what control he has. Not a legal beagle, but it seems his position is more like a chairman. He can't fire anyone nor impeach them. He can only recommend.

The acts of both Alito and Thomas are wrong, if not criminal, and I hope Roberts said something behind closed doors to all the justices, but if they don't choose to act, what power does he have? None, AFAIK.

IMO, he's trying to protect the integrity of the Court which has been heavily tarnished by the RWers and, especially, the MAGAts.
 
I'm not sure what control he has. Not a legal beagle, but it seems his position is more like a chairman. He can't fire anyone nor impeach them. He can only recommend.

The acts of both Alito and Thomas are wrong, if not criminal, and I hope Roberts said something behind closed doors to all the justices, but if they don't choose to act, what power does he have? None, AFAIK.

IMO, he's trying to protect the integrity of the Court which has been heavily tarnished by the RWers and, especially, the MAGAts.
I was thinking that about Alito and Thomas going rogue, with few consequences. And how the justices don't want ethical oversight. All of them, not just the liberals.
 
That would be true if it were a decade or so ago, but Roberts has sat and watched it all developed right in front of him and said little
Said little in public. We have no idea what's been said in private.

Other than air the Court's dirty laundry and bitch, what power does he have to bring Alito and Thomas into line? He can't conduct a one-man impeachment, AFAIK.

Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito Ethics Violations Found in New Senate Probe​

 
I was thinking that about Alito and Thomas going rogue, with few consequences. And how the justices don't want ethical oversight. All of them, not just the liberals.
Agreed about them going rogue AKA committing multiple ethics violations, but those are not crimes. Again. what power does Roberts have over them?

Trump’s election sparks retirement talk for Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor​

President-elect Trump’s White House victory has created tussles among conservatives and liberals alike over whether the Supreme Court’s oldest justices should retire.

Trump’s election has raised public anticipation that two of the court’s leading conservatives, Justice Clarence Thomas, 76, and Justice Samuel Alito, 74, may step down.


Although the incoming Republican-controlled Senate could glide their Trump-nominated replacements to confirmation, the speculation has drawn admonishment from a key figure in the conservative legal movement, who called the talk “crass.”

The election has meanwhile renewed fretting among some Democrats that the court could be headed to a 7-2 conservative majority as President Biden’s
term nears a close with Justice Sonia Sotomayor, 70, the court’s most senior liberal, showing no sign of stepping aside.
 
It would be evident to a lot of people, if most of you weren't so ignorantly biased, that Roberts is apolitical, or did you all forget his opinion on the ACA???????

the longer you fuckers do this stupid shit, the easier it becomes to see that y'all are too fucking juvenile to even vote.
 
View attachment 39358
MAGA Supreme Court justices trying to destroy our democracy:mad:
Right back at ya!

03fe400083ddb67eda335076c7a1a977
 
Coming from John Roberts who may be the worst Chief Justice in Supreme Court History!

The chief justice bashed “public officials” who criticize judges for their partisan rulings “without a credible basis for such allegations”

In his first term as president, Donald Trump built a conservative 6-3 supermajority on the Supreme Court. Ever since, the nation’s highest court has repeatedly issued increasingly extreme, far-right decisions on topics of abortion, race, the environment, corruption, and much more.

The Supreme Court has eliminated federal protections for abortion rights; limited the federal government’s ability to regulate carbon emissions, protect Americans’ drinking water, and limit ozone pollution; gutted federal agencies’ ability to implement regulations generally; opened up long-standing regulations to new challenges; made it easier for states to enact racial gerrymanders; eliminated college affirmative action policies; found businesses can discriminate against LGBTQ+ customers; permitted public school employees to lead students in prayer; decided that companies can pay public officials gratuities, or thank-you payments, for corrupt contracting decisions; and broadly shielded Trump from criminal prosecution for any so-called official acts he committed as president.

Trump is so proud of the conservatives on the court that he frequently praised the justices, individually by name, at 2024 campaign events — thanking them for their “courage” in deciding to overturn Roe v. Wade so states could ban abortion. At a September rally, Trump called the conservative justices “very brave” and argued that “people should be put in jail” for criticizing them.

The Supreme Court’s chief justice, John Roberts, is now echoing Trump’s demand that people stop criticizing him, his colleagues, and other federal jurists — while continuing to pretend that judges are not political.

In his annual end-of-year report, issued on Tuesday, Roberts wrote that public officials (read: Democrats) “regrettably have engaged in recent attempts to intimidate judges — for example, suggesting political bias in the judge’s adverse rulings without a credible basis for such allegations.” Roberts added, “Public officials certainly have a right to criticize the work of the judiciary, but they should be mindful that intemperance in their statements when it comes to judges may prompt dangerous reactions by others.”

The idea that Democrats have sought to intimidate the justices is laughable — save for a few lonely voices, they have said shockingly little and done nothing to attempt to rein in the court’s ongoing right-wing rampage. While Democrats have called out conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito for failing to disclose, in apparent violation of federal ethics rules, luxury travel provided by right-wing billionaires, they ultimately did nothing about that either.

Roberts — who reportedly drove the court’s far-reaching decision in the Trump immunity case — has long pretended to be an apolitical actor, who would simply call “balls and strikes” as a jurist.

It’s a ridiculous notion: Supreme Court justices — and federal judges generally — are political appointees. But since he was appointed by George W. Bush and confirmed in 2005, Roberts has overseen the court’s dramatic right-wing shift — which has been further turbocharged by Trump’s appointments of Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. The Supreme Court is the most conservative it’s been in nearly a century.

This is no accident: Roberts and his conservative colleagues on the Supreme Court were all selected and confirmed with support from right-wing dark-money interests — ultimately, with funding from some of the same people who have gifted the conservative justices undisclosed private jet rides and superyacht trips, given them lucrative teaching gigs, and steered consulting payments to at least one justice’s spouse.

Roberts and his colleagues were appointed to the Supreme Court to carry out a conservative political agenda — and that’s exactly what they have done. No one should pretend otherwise.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politi...erts-supreme-court-political-bias-1235223174/


View attachment 39358
MAGA Supreme Court justices trying to destroy our democracy:mad:
Fuck you asshole. You supported the assassination of your president elect so, fuck you!
 
Back
Top