Over half of white liberal women under 30 been diagnosed with a mental disorder

Libhater

Verified User
I realize that the liberal owl woman is well over 30, but that doesn't mean that she/her/it/tranny wasn't
mentally deprived at an age under 30.


yup.jpg
 

Evie Magazine - Extreme Right Bias - Propaganda - Fake News - Not Credible


QUESTIONABLE SOURCE​

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

  • Overall, we rate Evie Magazine as Far-Right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, propaganda, poor sources, false claims, and failed fact checks.

Detailed Report​

Questionable Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracy, Pseudoscience, Poor Sourcing, Failed Fact Checks, False Claims
Bias Rating: EXTREME RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: USA
Press Freedom Rating: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Website/Magazine
Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY


History

Founded in 2018 by Brittany Martinez and Gabriel Hugoboom, Evie Magazine is a conservative women’s magazine published online and once a year in print. According to their about page, “Millions of women across America have been forgotten by the publishing world. They’re tired of having to go to trashy or politically biased sites and magazines just to get quality reads on health, beauty, and more. For years, these publications have focused on proving how women are great by showing how they can be just like men.”

Brittany Martinez describes the site as a “Conservative Cosmo.”

Read our profile on the United States media and government.

Funded by / Ownership

Evie Media Group, Inc., owns and publishes Evie Magazine, with Gabriel Hugoboom serving as the CEO. Affiliate marketing and the sale of the annual print addition generates revenue.

Analysis / Bias

Evie Magazine publishes health, beauty, style, relationships, and career articles. They also have a section labeled “Culture,” which provides politically oriented news from a conservative perspective. Articles and headlines feature emotional wording, such as The Shamelessly Shallow Guide On How To Be A Soft Girl. The articles provided outside of the “Culture” category tend to be mostly non-political and focus on women’s health and beauty.






Under the Culture category, there is a radical difference in content. Most articles offer far-right viewpoints such as this J.K. Rowling Isn’t Backing Down On Defending Biological Women From Radical Transgender Ideology.

Evie Magazine holds extreme positions on abortion, such as claiming that abortion is never necessary, even if the woman needs an abortion to save her own life. According to The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, abortions can be medically necessary.

Evie Magazine has also published conspiracy theories such as this Bill Gates Is A Real Life Comic Book Villain Who Wants To Depopulate The World, So He’s Starting With The Most Vulnerable. There is no evidence to suggest this.

Finally, Evie consistently promotes anti-vaccination pseudoscience, such as this Nearly Half Of Women Who Took Pfizer Covid Trial Vaccine Experienced A Miscarriage. Not only is this false, but the source Naomi Wolf is also well-known for spreading scientific misinformation. In general, Evie Magazine is a far-right conservative source that publishes misinformation and makes false claims, especially regarding science.

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate Evie Magazine as Far-Right biased and Questionable based on the promotion of conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, propaganda, poor sources, false claims, and failed fact checks. (D. Van Zandt 01/29/2023)




Source: https://www.eviemagazine.com/

Last Updated on May 24, 2023 by Media Bias Fact Check
 
A 2020 Pew Research study has been referenced in various discussions and reports.

Specifically, the study found that 56.3% of white women ages 18-29 who identified as liberal had been told by a medical professional that they had a mental health condition.

This contrasts with lower rates among moderates (28.4%) and conservatives (27.3%) in the same demographic group.

Some commentators and researchers have suggested that liberal environments might encourage more openness about mental health, potentially leading to higher diagnosis rates.

The data does indicate a higher rate of mental health diagnoses among young, white liberal women.


@Grok



 
Quit kidding yourself with sewer internet media, Hater Boy. You have any idea how absurd such a claim is? As someone of the mental health community, I know that no one in the media is pretty to this kind of information. Because of patient confidentiality, even family members can go without knowing a sibling has a mental illness diagnosis. And yet here you are, believing some internet sewer rag with terrible bias and reliability has magically become pretty to millions of people's information that isn't shared. Whatever gets your rocks off, you sad, sad man.
 
Here's but one highly recognized and highly correct outfit called Pew that has given the basic
statistics that was outlined in my OP as proving the fact that white liberal women or liberal
women in general suffer some kind of mental disorder which clearly shows that more than
50% of them are emotional/psychological wrecks. So suck up the truth for once in your
liberal lives by coming back here to apologize to me for your obvious stupidity.

https://www.mensvoicesireland.com/articles/the-mental-health-crisis-among-young-liberal-women/
 
Quit kidding yourself with sewer internet media, Hater Boy. You have any idea how absurd such a claim is? As someone of the mental health community, I know that no one in the media is pretty to this kind of information.


:rofl2:

Triggered Lizard is...

iu


Your anecdotal appeal to authority is...


iu
 
Who would like a nice little humorous story, it's about a three minute read for most.

It's called
PixelVille
A Story of Spoiled Avocados

In the land of Pixelville, where avocado toast was currency and social media likes were the measure of one's soul, the young generation, namely Gen Z, was grappling with an affliction known as Trump Derangement Syndrome, or TDS for short. This was no ordinary malady; it was the kind that made history teachers pause and say, "Kids these days, they're allergic to history repeating itself."

After the latest election, where Trump had somehow managed to win again, Gen Z was in full panic mode. The first sign of the outbreak was when young Chloe, a TikTok influencer with a following larger than the population of some small countries, decided to express her political dismay in the most dramatic way possible—she shaved her head. Her followers, in a chainreaction of shock and solidarity, followed suit. Soon enough, Pixelville was a sea of freshly shorn heads, all glistening in the sunlight like a field of bald, rebellious sunflowers.

But hair wasn't the only casualty. Seeking solace, the young folks organized "Scream at the Lake" meetups. Every Sunday, they would gather at Lake Meme, forming circles around its tranquil waters. At the stroke of noon, they would face the water and unleash a cacophony of screams, hoping to exorcise their political frustrations into the depths. The ducks, who had previously enjoyed a peaceful existence, now wore expressions of profound existential dread,contemplating their life choices.

And then there was the great sex strike, initiated by none other than Kevin, who had once gone viral for his "Why I Won't Date Republicans" manifesto. His proposal was simple: no sexuntil Trump was out of office. It was a bold strategy, but it seemed like the perfect blend of activism and personal sacrifice. However, the plan had its challenges, particularly whenpartners didn't share the same political fervor. There were awkward conversations, like whenSarah explained to her boyfriend, "Look, it's not you; it's just the political climate."

The irrational fears were rampant. They feared that the country would turn into a dystopian nightmare overnight, with no avocado toast left in sight. They were convinced that any moment, they'd be forced into some form of 1984-esque surveillance, despite their lives already being under the digital microscope of social media. The radical left's prophecies of doom had become their daily bread, and they ate it with a side of anxiety.

One day, as they gathered by Lake Meme, a peculiar thing happened. A duck, perhaps thewisest of the lot, waddled into the circle during the screaming session and quacked loudly,silencing the crowd. In that moment of silence, the absurdity of their actions dawned on them.

Here they were, shouting at a lake, bald, and in a self-imposed celibacy that was more about proving a point than effecting change.

The duck, now an accidental sage, seemed to say, "Quack, quack, maybe it's time to grow your hair back, find some actual activism, and maybe, just maybe, enjoy life a bit?"

And so, Pixelville's Gen Z began to rethink their strategy. Some grew their hair back, othersstarted community projects, and many learned that while political engagement was important,so was not letting it consume their entire identity. The sex strike ended with a collectiverealization that perhaps they should focus on changing hearts and minds through dialoguerather than deprivation.

As for Trump Derangement Syndrome, it didn't disappear overnight, but the screams at LakeMeme turned into laughter, and the bald heads slowly became less of a statement and moreof a fashion choice. In the end, they learned that while politics shapes the world, it shouldn'tshape them into caricatures of their worst fears. And the ducks? Well, they finally got somepeace, and perhaps, a little more respect from the humans they shared the lake with
 
No, thanks, anyway.
Wasn't really thinking about you, I know that words grouped into sentences are about maxing you out, I wouldn't dream of asking you to read a paragraph. Besides, don't you have another 20 completely fucking moronic threads to come up with?
 
Par for the course, as "they" say.

Nobody's saying that, you fucking libtard. Did you see how many people were bitching about your dumbassery, flooding this site like a toddler who just discovered the toilet flush? Maybe tomorrow you should check into the hospital and see if they'll let you back into the real world. You're only kidding yourself if you think you've got your issues under control.
 
Nobody's saying that.


The phrase "Par for the course" is quite common in English-speaking contexts.

It originates from golf, where "par" refers to the standard number of strokes expected to complete a hole or the entire course.

Over time, this phrase has been adapted into everyday language to signify that something is typical or expected, often used to express that an outcome, though not ideal, is what one would normally anticipate.

In terms of usage:

  • Frequency: The phrase is widely understood and used in both American and British English. It appears frequently in casual conversation, media, and literature to describe situations that are standard or to be expected, especially when those situations are somewhat disappointing but not surprising.
  • Understanding: Even those not familiar with golf generally comprehend the idioms' meaning due to its common use. It's often employed to convey that an event or situation is typical within a given context.
  • Cultural Impact: The phrase has transcended its golfing origins to become a part of everyday language, used in contexts ranging from work to personal life to describe expected outcomes or behaviors. It's noted in various dictionaries and idiom collections, underscoring its prevalence and acceptance in language.


Overall, "Par for the course" is a well-established idiom in English, regularly used to denote normalcy or expectation in various situations.

@Grok
 
The phrase "Par for the course" is quite common in English-speaking contexts.

It originates from golf, where "par" refers to the standard number of strokes expected to complete a hole or the entire course.

Over time, this phrase has been adapted into everyday language to signify that something is typical or expected, often used to express that an outcome, though not ideal, is what one would normally anticipate.

In terms of usage:

  • Frequency: The phrase is widely understood and used in both American and British English. It appears frequently in casual conversation, media, and literature to describe situations that are standard or to be expected, especially when those situations are somewhat disappointing but not surprising.
  • Understanding: Even those not familiar with golf generally comprehend the idioms' meaning due to its common use. It's often employed to convey that an event or situation is typical within a given context.
  • Cultural Impact: The phrase has transcended its golfing origins to become a part of everyday language, used in contexts ranging from work to personal life to describe expected outcomes or behaviors. It's noted in various dictionaries and idiom collections, underscoring its prevalence and acceptance in language.


Overall, "Par for the course" is a well-established idiom in English, regularly used to denote normalcy or expectation in various situations.

@Grok
I will go out on a limb and state that anyone who does not understand "Par for the course" is not worth investing into.
 
If you have to explain "Par for the course" perhaps you need to reconsider who you hang with.

Just Sayin.....
 
Back
Top