The iPad, Your Newest Workplace Productivity Enhancer

Topspin

Verified User
The iPad, Your Newest Workplace Productivity Enhancer
The iPad is fun and games. And spreadsheets and presentation graphics and collaboration tools and …


Photo illustration by Arthur Hochstein (photo by Andersen Ross/Getty Images)

By Rich Jaroslovsky

BW EXCLUSIVES

Lutz: Toyota No Longer God-Like
Mulally: Ford Not Taking Health-Care Charge
BMW Targets Beating Lexus in U.S. by 2012
RIM's Sales, Shipments Miss Estimates
Obama: U.S. Needs More Oil Drilling
STORY TOOLS

post a comment
e-mail this story
print this story
order a reprint
suggest a story
digg this
add to Business Exchange
linkedin connections

Apple (AAPL) has largely pitched the iPad as an ideal way to consume media in all its many forms. Books, games, movies, magazines—step right up, folks, we've got it all for you in one magical device!

For the iPad to be truly revolutionary—Steve Jobs' word—it'll have to do a lot more than be a better e-book reader. The real promise of the device is that it has a chance to redefine what we think of as personal computing. And that has implications not just for Apple's own Macintosh business but for Microsoft's (MSFT), Google's (GOOG), and just about everyone else's.

For business users and others looking for a new productivity tool, the pound-and-a-half iPad offers a marriage of the always-connected ultra-portability of a wireless phone with the power and flexibility of a laptop or even a desktop PC. "I think this is the new Mac, I really do," says Marc Benioff, chairman and chief executive officer of salesforce.com (CRM). "People aren't going to want Macs anymore. I think people won't want laptops anymore once they see what's really possible on great tablets."

It's safe to say no one at Apple, least of all Jobs, is eager to see the demise of its $999-and-up line of Mac laptops and desktops. (Apple declined to comment for this story.) But there are plenty of potential business customers who seem as ready to shift platforms as Benioff. More than half the people surveyed recently by Zogby International said they would use a tablet device such as the iPad for working outside the office, according to software maker Sybase (SY), which commissioned the poll. "Clearly, the iPad has a role to play in the business market," says Charlie Wolf, a Needham & Co. analyst who has a buy rating on Apple. "The demand appears to be far more diverse than I originally expected."

At $499 for the base model with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, the iPad is in the same price ballpark as netbooks, the underpowered miniature laptops that run Microsoft Windows. True, the iPad has much less local storage—from 16 to 64 gigabytes of solid-state memory depending on the model, vs. the 160-gigabyte hard drive found on your typical netbook. What the iPad lacks in storage it tries to make up for with connectivity, which, for mobile business users, suggests the need for 3G service. That adds $130 to the cost of the unit, plus $15 or $30 a month for the data plans being offered by AT&T (T).
 
Verdict is in on Apple iPad: It's a winner

Top Stories   *  Updated 8h 58m ago
By Edward C. Baig, USA TODAY


Months of speculation, feverish lust, an überhyped prize that could disrupt the status quo of computing. You wouldn't be the first person to compare the run-up to Saturday's arrival of the iPad to the prelaunch mania that surrounded the iPhone. Apple's freshly conceived slate-style computer promises to influence the media, mobile entertainment and publishing industries the way its close cousin the iPhone has affected wireless.

The first iPad is a winner. It stacks up as a formidable electronic-reader rival for Amazon's Kindle. It gives portable game machines from Nintendo and Sony a run for their money. At the very least, the iPad will likely drum up mass-market interest in tablet computing in ways that longtime tablet visionary and Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates could only dream of.

For more than a decade, nobody, not even a deep-pocketed company like Microsoft, has successfully cracked the tablet market. Apple, based on my tests over several days, is likely to be the first. Back in 2001, Gates predicted tablets would be the most popular form of PCs sold in America within five years. That obviously didn't come to pass. Apple's roots with the tablet form of computing date at least to its ill-fated Newton, an early 1990s personal digital assistant pushed by then-CEO John Sculley and later killed by Steve Jobs.

These days, several large computing companies have shown off or announced some sort of slate-type computer, including Dell, Hewlett-Packard and Lenovo. Netbook pioneer Asus told Forbes that it, too, plans to roll out tablets. But Apple's new tablet will do the most to spawn renewed interest in the category and could tap into markets as varied as medicine and education. This week, Pennsylvania's Seton Hill University announced plans to give every full-time student this fall an iPad. Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster expects 2.7 million iPads to be sold in 2010 and 8 million next year. Endpoint Technologies analyst Roger Kay ups the sum to about 4 million units the first year.

An often-asked question after Jobs unveiled the tablet at the end of January was: What is iPad's purpose for being? I answered that question by surfing the Web, watching the movies Up and Michael Jackson's This Is It, reading the late Sen. Edward Kennedy's True Compass, playing Scrabble and an accelerometer-driven game called RealRacing HD, and boning up on the periodic table of elements.

The iPad is larger than a smartphone but smaller than a typical laptop. Depending on your perspective, the space between is either fertile ground for an electronic device or a no-man's land. Even Apple seems unsure to what degree the iPad may hurt sales of its MacBook or MacBook Pro notebooks.

The iPad is not so much about what you can do — browse, do e-mail, play games, read e-books and more — but how you can do it. That's where Apple is rewriting the rulebook for mainstream computing. There is no mouse or physical keyboard. Everything is based on touch. All programs arrive directly through Apple's App Store. Apple's tablet is fun, simple, stunning to look at and blazingly fast. Inside is a new Apple chip, the A4. The machine is the antithesis of the cheap underpowered netbook computers that Jobs easily dismisses. "Netbooks aren't better at anything," Jobs scoffed during his January presentation introducing the iPad. "They're slow, they have low-quality displays and they run clunky old PC software."

What does a successful iPad launch mean for traditional netbooks? They'll have to adapt or disappear — especially since their price advantage compared with the entry-level iPad isn't as great as some might have thought it would be. "You can use the iPhone as the blueprint for how this will play out," Munster says.

Early buyers (and those who were among the first to reserve the iPad online) can get one Saturday at Apple Stores and certain Best Buys. Those who preorder it now online must wait until April 12 because of apparent shortages.

Wi-Fi-only models will cost $499 for a 16-gigabyte version, $599 for 32 GB, and $699 for 64 GB. Models with Wi-Fi and 3G wireless — which lets you connect through AT&T's data network when Wi-Fi isn't available — come later in April, at $629 for 16 GB, $729 for 32 GB and $829 for 64 GB.

The latter models don't require a wireless contract. Monthly AT&T prepaid data rates are attractive: $14.99 for 250 MB or $29.99 for an unlimited plan. You buy 3G service directly from the iPad. The charge doesn't show up on your AT&T bill or through iTunes, but rather on your credit card.

You will have to buy into the iTunes ecosystem, of course, to watch movies, read e-books and sync up the apps.

Basic design

The half-inch-thick, magazine-size iPad is thin and, at 1.5 pounds, light with a gorgeous, glossy, backlit 9.7-inch multitouch display. The fingerprint-resistant screen has an exceptionally wide viewing sweet spot for a movie and is terrific for showing off most of a Web page. The device resembles an iPhone on growth hormones. It shares many of the smaller handheld's design elements, down to the lone home button below the display. As on the iPhone, you can have up to 11 screens of icons.

IPad has the same kind of smart sensors that change the orientation of the screen from portrait to landscape, depending on how it's rotated. (It's always right side up.) And, like the iPhone, it takes its cue from your fingers, whether you pinch to zoom in or out on Web pages, location-based maps and pictures — or flick to scroll up or down a page. You can easily search across all content.

There's a hidden microphone but no built-in voice recorder app (for leaving voice notes, say). The single speaker isn't stereo, but you can get stereo output when you plug in headphones.

Apps

The iPad will run just about all of the 150,000-plus iPhone or iPod Touch apps sold (or available free) in the App Store, presenting boundless "there's an app for that" possibilities. If you own an iPhone or Touch, you already have a stable of programs to work on the iPad.

Those older apps appear in a small window on the iPad display. You can blow them up to fill the screen through a process called "pixel doubling." It's more than adequate for many apps, but enlarging the characters reveals any imperfections.

None of this is lost on Apple, which is encouraging developers to write for the bigger screen. Apple expects more than 1,000 iPad-specific apps to be available at launch, and I've already sampled a few, including Reuters News Pro from Thomson Reuters, the Bento for iPad database from FileMaker, and the Twitterrific Twitter program from the Iconfactory.

I've enjoyed racing games and Labyrinth on the iPhone, but playing such titles on the iPad spoils you. The once-appealing iPhone screen looks puny. I played Scrabble over my home network, with one player using an iPhone, the other an iPad.

A larger screen is perfect for a recipe app such as Epicurious or the digital painting app called Brushes. The built-in Maps app also benefits from the larger display. As with the similar iPhone app, you can zoom in to a street-level view or locate nearby restaurants.

The iPad's splendor and power may be best shown by The Elements: A Visual Exploration The $13.99 program is more electronic book than traditional app, but it's not like any e-book you've seen. The periodic table of elements comes to life when you touch your finger against any element. Handsome photographs of objects spin around so you can observe them from all vantage points.

Equally attractive: the Marvel Comics app, which closely replicates printed comics.

USA TODAY will be launching its own app.

Electronic publishing

Apple is taking solid aim at the burgeoning electronic-reader market dominated by the Kindle. Judged solely from a sizzle standpoint: There's no contest. Titles on the iPad such as Winnie the Pooh (which comes preloaded on the iPad) boast colorful illustrations. The 6-inch Kindle screen is grayscale.

You can change pages on the iPad by tapping the screen: The page turns naturally, like a book. On Kindle, you have to press physical buttons and wait an instant while the page refreshes. Rotate the iPad, and you'll see two pages side by side.

Newspaper and magazine layouts look vastly superior on the iPad compared with Kindle. The iPad is backlit, so you can read in the dark. You have to supply a reading light with Kindle.

The covers you buy in Apple's new iBookstore land on a handsome depiction of a wooden bookshelf, again more elegant and easier to navigate than Kindle's clunky menus.

But Amazon retains some bragging points for avid readers, starting with a cheaper $259 price that I suspect will need to drop a lot further. At 10 hours or so, the iPad battery life, while impressive, falls far short of the two weeks you might get off a Kindle charge. It remains to be seen whether reading on a backlit screen for hours will be as easy on the eyes as the Kindle is. Curling up in bed was more comfortable with a 10.2-ounce Kindle than with the weightier iPad.

Amazon has about 450,000 book titles in the Kindle Store vs. 60,000 in iBookstore. Many best sellers in Apple's store cost $12.99, though some are $9.99. Amazon is likely to charge similar prices after iPad arrives; Amazon wouldn't comment. Out of the gate, Apple has support from major publishers Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster. Random House remains on the sidelines; it does support the Kindle.

Deficiencies

The iPad has its share of Version 1.0 inadequacies. It doesn't multitask, save playing iTunes music in the background. There's no webcam for those of us hoping to do video chats. The battery is sealed. It's too big for your pocket.

Videos failed to play at Hulu and ESPN, among other Web destinations. Why? The Safari browser on the iPad doesn't support videos based on the popular Adobe Flash Internet video standard.

The issue may be alleviated over time. Apple is backing an emerging video standard called HTML5. Just this week, Brightcove, whose video technology is used by many media companies, said it plans to offer HTML5 video streaming to its customers. The iPad can also display video at YouTube (there's an app for that), Vimeo and the White House website, whitehouse.gov.

Some will decry the absence of a USB port or other connectors, which might let you hook up a printer or bolster storage. Everything comes through the standard iPod-like dock connector on the bottom of the iPad. You can purchase a $29 iPad Camera Connection Kit, which lets you connect a USB camera or import photos via an SD card.

Another quibble: Controls to start a flick from the beginning or to resume where you left off are buried in settings rather than presented when you launch the videos app.

Many people will still need a more traditional computer. You can't edit video on an iPad. And the virtual onscreen keyboard that pops up when needed is fine for e-mails or scribbling notes, but I wouldn't want to regularly write articles using it.

You can employ a wireless Bluetooth keyboard, and Apple sells an optional $69 iPad Keyboard Dock. It's a full-size keyboard that connects to the dock connector.

Apple sells a $39 soft microfiber case that doubles as a stand for watching videos and slideshows. You can bank on third-party companies to provide other accessories and how-to books. (Disclosure: I'm co-writing one, iPad For Dummies.)

The iPad has built-in notes, calendar and contacts applications, and Apple sells slick, redesigned versions of its iWork productivity applications — $10 each for the Keynote presentation program, the Pages word processor and the Numbers spreadsheet. Still, for most folks, the iPad is more about consuming content than creating it.

Nowhere is this more true than with photos. The built-in Photo app is similar to the iPhoto program on Macs. Photos are placed in stacks. Tap one, and the picture album spreads apart so that each picture is visible. Tap a picture, and it swells up. Pinch and spread your fingers to zoom. The Faces and Places feature lets you find pictures based on who is in them or where they were shot.

Apple has pretty much nailed it with this first iPad, though there's certainly room for improvement. Nearly three years after making a splash with the iPhone, Apple has delivered another impressive product that largely lives up to the hype.

E-mail: ebaig@usatoday.com
 
*Ugh*

Remember when Microsoft kept having people write editorials about how great ME was? No matter how much they try to tell me it is anything different, it is simply an iPhone that can't be used as a phone. It doesn't even have more memory, no USB ports, nada. Waste of my time.
 
*Ugh*

Remember when Microsoft kept having people write editorials about how great ME was? No matter how much they try to tell me it is anything different, it is simply an iPhone that can't be used as a phone. It doesn't even have more memory, no USB ports, nada. Waste of my time.

To me it's not a matter of what a particular person thinks, what the market thinks matters. And the market like me is jizzing all over it. It'll prob sell a million before it's even seen. I'd say that's due to the fact that the Jesus phone is exponentially better than the next best.:good4u:
 
To me it's not a matter of what a particular person thinks, what the market thinks matters. And the market like me is jizzing all over it. It'll prob sell a million before it's even seen. I'd say that's due to the fact that the Jesus phone is exponentially better than the next best.:good4u:
And there were at least "several million" copies of ME sold, it didn't make it good. So far I have read nothing that makes it the Jeebus device that these over-hyped editorials are talking about. It doesn't have any more memory than my Android, can't be used as a phone, is restrictive in how it connects to your computer, can't be used as a tether, isn't a phone.... It's a huge retarded iPhone with none of the coolness of true portability.
 
it's not marketed as a phone. And like the iphone isn't for everyone the ipad isn't either. I like the iphone because it is by far the best mobile internet platform, usage shows that.
The ipad to me will be a bigger faster iphone. I mostly browse, listen to music, watch movies and trade stocks on my iphone, oh and mispell post here. The Ipad with do all of the above faster on a screen 3x as large. It's kind of a coffee table magazine size web tool.
 
And there were at least "several million" copies of ME sold, it didn't make it good. So far I have read nothing that makes it the Jeebus device that these over-hyped editorials are talking about. It doesn't have any more memory than my Android, can't be used as a phone, is restrictive in how it connects to your computer, can't be used as a tether, isn't a phone.... It's a huge retarded iPhone with none of the coolness of true portability.

Maybe I am just old. But I have a cell phone, a digital camera, an Ipod, and a laptop. I don't expect to be able to write a chapter on my phone, for my phone to take great pictures, or for my cell phone battery to be able to last thru hours of playing music.

I can live with having separate devices.
 
P.S. I sold the stock pre release. Made a quick couple thousand on the pre hype like I did on the iphone. I think at 237, I'm safer in merck and intel. Hopefully it'll crash after the ipad is found out not to cure cancer by Monday.
 
Maybe I am just old. But I have a cell phone, a digital camera, an Ipod, and a laptop. I don't expect to be able to write a chapter on my phone, for my phone to take great pictures, or for my cell phone battery to be able to last thru hours of playing music.

I can live with having separate devices.
The thing of it is, with its size it could have been a major improvement, but the memory lacks huge. It is simply an iPhone made larger without the phone part. They should have waited until they could produce something that was a major improvement over the phone, at least add memory!

Give me a reason to buy this thing other than a larger screen. If I'm going to add to my device entourage, make it worth my time.
 
Like the iphone they will upgrade and get all us apple fan boys on our knees yet again.
It's supposed to be way faster than the iphone with thier new A4 chip. I'm testing a download of my favorite pod cast marijuana radio on the ipad saturday vs iphone which took 12 minutes. I have zero doubt my experience will be way better than my MS laptop and they will sell millions. To each his own, it's the Porsche of computers. But a cheapskate like me would never actually buy a Porsche.
 
Like the iphone they will upgrade and get all us apple fan boys on our knees yet again.
It's supposed to be way faster than the iphone with thier new A4 chip. I'm testing a download of my favorite pod cast marijuana radio on the ipad saturday vs iphone which took 12 minutes. I have zero doubt my experience will be way better than my MS laptop and they will sell millions. To each his own, it's the Porsche of computers. But a cheapskate like me would never actually buy a Porsche.
Then they should have waited until it was actually an improvement over the phone. They'll get all the technophile purchases, but I don't think this one will stretch past those people mostly because it isn't a major improvement over the phone.
 
You don't read much do you? Some predict it has sold a million prior to anyone even touching it. Steve Jobs is a marketing genius.

By saturday they will have people thinking it cures baldness and creates stiffies better than Viagra.
 
You don't read much do you? Some predict it has sold a million prior to anyone even touching it. Steve Jobs is a marketing genius.

By saturday they will have people thinking it cures baldness and creates stiffies better than Viagra.
Right. A million of the technophiles. In a nation of over 300,000,000 people, 1 million isn't as much as you think.

I don't think this will go past that group of people who always "has" to have the newest device, mostly because it isn't much of an improvement over the phone. Just bigger and less phone-like.
 
Right. A million of the technophiles. In a nation of over 300,000,000 people, 1 million isn't as much as you think.

I don't think this will go past that group of people who always "has" to have the newest device, mostly because it isn't much of an improvement over the phone. Just bigger and less phone-like.

you actually own the stock and talk like that. Do you know how many Kindles have ever sold. Hint, ipad has sold more untouched prerelease than the total to date of kinlde the most popular tablet.
I just read this
IPad Review Roundup: ‘Beautiful,’ but Is It a ‘Game Changer’?
Article Comments Digits HOME PAGE »Email Printer Friendly Permalink Share:
facebook Twitter Digg StumbleUpon Viadeo Orkut Yahoo! Buzz Fark reddit LinkedIn del.icio.us MySpace Text Size
By Jennifer Valentino-DeVries
The reviews are in on Apple’s new iPad, and the consensus is no surprise: It’s beautifully designed and a possible “game changer,” but the early version has a few drawbacks, and only time will tell if the iPad will alter the status quo.

The reviewers almost universally gush over the simple experience of using the iPad. The Journal’s Walt Mossberg calls it “sleek,” “beautiful” and “a pleasure to use.” David Pogue of the New York Times says “the iPad is so fast and light, the multitouch screen so bright and responsive, the software so easy to navigate, that it really does qualify as a new category of gadget.” The iPad is described as “a winner” in the USA Today review by Edward C. Baig, who adds that “Apple has pretty much nailed it.” And Tim Gideon at PC Magazine, who has the most in-depth review currently available, calls it “gorgeous,” “slim” and “beautiful.”

Stephen Fry, writing for Time, did not get an extensive at-home review the way other reviewers did, but his all-consuming love for the iPad takes the cake: “I had been prepared for a smooth feel, for a bright screen and the ‘immersive’ experience everyone had promised. I was not prepared, though, for how instant the relationship I formed with the device would be.”

Of course, everyone also gives a nod to the device’s drawbacks. Pogue does this most clearly, dividing his column into a review for “techies” and a review for “non-techies” — the implication being that techies will find a lot to gripe about. Anyone who has been paying attention to online discussions of the iPad will be familiar with the complaints: It’s a “gigantic iPad Touch,” there is no multitasking and it doesn’t play Flash video. Mossberg raises a few more problems: The Wi-Fi version lacks GPS, and you can’t watch wide-screen-dimension videos. PC Magazine’s reviewer seeks a camera for video chats.

A few specifics were mentioned by almost all the reviewers. The most surprising is that battery life exceeds expectations. Mossberg says he was “impressed,” and Pogue says his iPad “played movies continuously” for more than 12 hours — well more than the 10 promised by Apple.

Apps that were designed for the iPhone work on the iPad, but they either open in a small window or fill the screen and look blocky or fuzzy. Apps designed specifically for the iPad get good reviews, particularly Marvel Comics, which Boing Boing describes as “game changing,” and an app about the periodic table of the elements, which might not sound interesting but which is apparently “dazzling” and “not like any e-book you’ve seen,” according to Boing Boing and USA Today.

But the real question is whether the iPad will succeed in making a space for the tablet computer as a viable category. Gideon of PC Magazine acknowledges that he was among those who “wondered who would drop hundreds of dollars for this not-quite-computer,” but after using it he has come to the conclusion that it “just makes sense.”

And Mossberg sums it up this way: “The iPad is an advance in making more-sophisticated computing possible via a simple touch interface on a slender, light device. Only time will tell if it’s a real challenger to the laptop and netbook.”
 
you actually own the stock and talk like that. Do you know how many Kindles have ever sold. Hint, ipad has sold more untouched prerelease than the total to date of kinlde the most popular tablet.
I just read this
IPad Review Roundup: ‘Beautiful,’ but Is It a ‘Game Changer’?
Article Comments Digits HOME PAGE »Email Printer Friendly Permalink Share:
facebook Twitter Digg StumbleUpon Viadeo Orkut Yahoo! Buzz Fark reddit LinkedIn del.icio.us MySpace Text Size
By Jennifer Valentino-DeVries
The reviews are in on Apple’s new iPad, and the consensus is no surprise: It’s beautifully designed and a possible “game changer,” but the early version has a few drawbacks, and only time will tell if the iPad will alter the status quo.

The reviewers almost universally gush over the simple experience of using the iPad. The Journal’s Walt Mossberg calls it “sleek,” “beautiful” and “a pleasure to use.” David Pogue of the New York Times says “the iPad is so fast and light, the multitouch screen so bright and responsive, the software so easy to navigate, that it really does qualify as a new category of gadget.” The iPad is described as “a winner” in the USA Today review by Edward C. Baig, who adds that “Apple has pretty much nailed it.” And Tim Gideon at PC Magazine, who has the most in-depth review currently available, calls it “gorgeous,” “slim” and “beautiful.”

Stephen Fry, writing for Time, did not get an extensive at-home review the way other reviewers did, but his all-consuming love for the iPad takes the cake: “I had been prepared for a smooth feel, for a bright screen and the ‘immersive’ experience everyone had promised. I was not prepared, though, for how instant the relationship I formed with the device would be.”

Of course, everyone also gives a nod to the device’s drawbacks. Pogue does this most clearly, dividing his column into a review for “techies” and a review for “non-techies” — the implication being that techies will find a lot to gripe about. Anyone who has been paying attention to online discussions of the iPad will be familiar with the complaints: It’s a “gigantic iPad Touch,” there is no multitasking and it doesn’t play Flash video. Mossberg raises a few more problems: The Wi-Fi version lacks GPS, and you can’t watch wide-screen-dimension videos. PC Magazine’s reviewer seeks a camera for video chats.

A few specifics were mentioned by almost all the reviewers. The most surprising is that battery life exceeds expectations. Mossberg says he was “impressed,” and Pogue says his iPad “played movies continuously” for more than 12 hours — well more than the 10 promised by Apple.

Apps that were designed for the iPhone work on the iPad, but they either open in a small window or fill the screen and look blocky or fuzzy. Apps designed specifically for the iPad get good reviews, particularly Marvel Comics, which Boing Boing describes as “game changing,” and an app about the periodic table of the elements, which might not sound interesting but which is apparently “dazzling” and “not like any e-book you’ve seen,” according to Boing Boing and USA Today.

But the real question is whether the iPad will succeed in making a space for the tablet computer as a viable category. Gideon of PC Magazine acknowledges that he was among those who “wondered who would drop hundreds of dollars for this not-quite-computer,” but after using it he has come to the conclusion that it “just makes sense.”

And Mossberg sums it up this way: “The iPad is an advance in making more-sophisticated computing possible via a simple touch interface on a slender, light device. Only time will tell if it’s a real challenger to the laptop and netbook.”
I also own Microsoft and have no problem in pointing out that some of their products aren't improvements or aren't enough of an improvement to be a "game changer".

The iPad needs improvement, even though I own the stock.

You shouldn't blind yourself to reality just because you have stock in the company, in fact that is reason to open your eyes and see what they are really offering. There just isn't enough improvement in this device over the phone to make it into the predicted "game changer"..
 
they won't touch MS in desktop
they will freaking kill on sales from ipad, I just hope they have a huge ipullback
they quantum leaped forward in form factor and ease of use with the iphone, now they kill the netbook with the ipad which is an iphone xphone on steroids.
web, movies, games, sports bazziggaddy
 
Maybe I am just old. But I have a cell phone, a digital camera, an Ipod, and a laptop. I don't expect to be able to write a chapter on my phone, for my phone to take great pictures, or for my cell phone battery to be able to last thru hours of playing music.

I can live with having separate devices.

Jack of all trades master of none. Yeah, I am not blown away by being able to take crappy pictures on my phone or even use it as an inconveniently sized mp3 player. Just be a phone. Though, it is nice to have internet or email, if you are doing something where you are idle, like traveling as a passenger. Most of the other features are nice in a pinch but, mostly useless.

They want to create this Swiss Army knife of electronic devices, but it will never be the end all be all that they seem to hype it as. A Swiss Army knife is handy if you don't have the actual tool(s) it attempts to replicate. But you would not want to use it do any real job. The same is true with these things. A device dedicated to taking only pictures is always going to make the camera phones look like crap in comparison. The ideal size for a music, phone/messaging and reading device are too far apart to ever make one device practical.
 
most iphone users are under 30
was it a game changer?
it's added $2,000,000,000 annually to AT&T's revenue.
 
most iphone users are under 30
was it a game changer?
it's added $2,000,000,000 annually to AT&T's revenue.
And most of those people will seek an improvement before they purchase an iPad. It won't be the game-changer you predict until they actually improve it from the retarded iPhone that it is now.

Most Microsoft users are (insert group here), but they still hated ME even though there were editorials that said it was a great OS and a "game-changer"...
 
Back
Top