Count & report heavy Dem areas first

And the Prosecutor campaigned on that because the people of NYC wanted to see JUSTICE done and to stop Trump from fucking over so many people that live in NYC.
No, the Prosecutor campaigned on it because he wanted to do it. That isn't "justice," it's vigilantism. Trump wasn't even living in New York at the time, and he wasn't "fucking over" anyone living there.
 
FUCK YOU my step son lives down there and he said the people down there were fed up with all the BULL SHIT Trump was getting away with and how TRUMP was always FUCKING the people that worked for him .
 
It's obvious MAGA doesn't understand how elections & vote counts work, and how leads can shift over the course of the evening. They firmly believe that once Trump takes a lead, he won.

Simple solution: count & report the heaviest Dem areas first, so Kamala takes a huge lead. Even if she loses, it's fine - it will turn out the same in the end. But if Trump takes any kind of lead early, it's going to be all of the cloak & dagger/shipping ballots in during the dark of the night conspiracy stuff from MAGA.

We have to adjust how we do things to cater to their myopic understanding of how things work.
It doesn't matter. No matter what happens when trump loses, the trumptards will claim the "vote was rigged" launch lawsuit after lawsuit, audit after audit and perhaps even try another coup.
 
No, the Prosecutor campaigned on it because he wanted to do it. That isn't "justice," it's vigilantism. Trump wasn't even living in New York at the time, and he wasn't "fucking over" anyone living there.
So if you move out of state, your crimes should not be prosecuted? I suppose when you are a Trumpy, that makes sense.
 
It doesn't matter. No matter what happens when trump loses, the trumptards will claim the "vote was rigged" launch lawsuit after lawsuit, audit after audit and perhaps even try another coup.
Correct. But this time around, trump won't be in the White House during the challenges and Dems. will hold the Speaker's seat.

trump was so petty, he gave the doorman at the White House the day off so nobody would be there for the ceremonial entrance by the Bidens.
 
Yes. He saw that on Newsmax. It's the only logical solution to a non issue.
They usually just believe whatever they are told by pundits on Newsmax.

Trump was told by his own polling consultant that the early election returns would look like they are tending Republican because the rural precincts report in before the Democratic-heavy urban precincts.
 
They usually just believe whatever they are told by pundits on Newsmax.

Trump was told by his own polling consultant that the early election returns would look like they are tending Republican because the rural precincts report in before the Democratic-heavy urban precincts.
That's evident in this thread.
 
Imagine the idiocy of crying about how high crime is (it's actually down) and voting for a convicted felon to do something about it. Isn't that like electing the fox to guard the chicken coop?
It's like Electing a Drunken fool to enforce Prohibition!
 
They did. They took away the right of the Democrats to choose
an alternate candidate to run in Biden's place. Having the people
vote for their choice of candidate is how it's been done in the past

Many of us wanted him to run. Yes, there were those who said he
was too old and developed dementia.

That is correct. If he chose to run, he was the incumbent and duly
voted in the primary as the Democrat's candidate.

There surely were attacks from our side. There's no denying that.
Ironically, he was in it to win it and was "sharp as a tack" according
to his vice president. Then, there's a pullout of some bigger donors,
a meeting between Obama, Pelosi and Shummer. All of a sudden,
Joe quits and Harris is thrust into becoming the queen bee of the
whole damn hornet's nest The lowest rated VP in history suddenly
becomes Cinderella.

Frank! Settle down! Don't blow a fuse over this. We want you to
hang around for a while yet.

Yes. It was his (influenced) choice. He would have lost anyway.
How come it's Republicans who are crying the blues?
 
They did. They took away the right of the Democrats to choose
an alternate candidate to run in Biden's place. Having the people
vote for their choice of candidate is how it's been done in the past

Many of us wanted him to run. Yes, there were those who said he
was too old and developed dementia.

That is correct. If he chose to run, he was the incumbent and duly
voted in the primary as the Democrat's candidate.

There surely were attacks from our side. There's no denying that.
Ironically, he was in it to win it and was "sharp as a tack" according
to his vice president. Then, there's a pullout of some bigger donors,
a meeting between Obama, Pelosi and Shummer. All of a sudden,
Joe quits and Harris is thrust into becoming the queen bee of the
whole damn hornet's nest The lowest rated VP in history suddenly
Seems to me that says going to college makes you stupid...


becomes Cinderella.
Frank! Settle down! Don't blow a fuse over this. We want you to
hang around for a while yet.

Yes. It was his (influenced) choice. He would have lost anyway.
It was his choice...which is what I said.

HE CHOSE NOT TO RUN.
 
So if you move out of state, your crimes should not be prosecuted? I suppose when you are a Trumpy, that makes sense.
In one case, New York changed their laws for a period of one year to allow Trump to be sued. In another, a law never applied as it was (the Bragg case) was twisted into a pretzel to try and get Trump. In the third, New York didn't have standing and assessed deals in real estate that didn't happen in New York to try and get Trump.

I suppose that makes sense to you if it was to get Trump.
 
How come it's Republicans who are crying the blues?
Because the trump campaign was blindsided by Biden's poker skills. Suddenly, trump was the senile one who is too old to be POTUS.

In essence, they spent millions on a campaign message that backfired spectacularly.
 
In one case, New York changed their laws for a period of one year to allow Trump to be sued. In another, a law never applied as it was (the Bragg case) was twisted into a pretzel to try and get Trump. In the third, New York didn't have standing and assessed deals in real estate that didn't happen in New York to try and get Trump.

I suppose that makes sense to you if it was to get Trump.
You're going to have to be more specific, because this sounds like nonsense.
 
Back
Top