Florida arrests 100 looters following hurricanes. 41 are illegals.

Nope. He (and you) are incorrect. The use of 'illegals' in that post was as a noun.
Next you'll be inventing a collective noun for the adjective ' illegal '
Dumbass. ' Illegals ' is a common gutter noun. Right up your common street.
Haw, haw................................................haw.
 
Last edited:
Next you'll be inventing a collective noun for the adjective ' illegal '
Dumbass. ' Illegals ' is a common gutter noun. Right up your common street.
Haw, haw................................................haw.
I already know you don't read and understand English or it's grammar. You don't have to keep proving it, Moonbat.
 
Bet they weren't looting in an Asian neighborhood. They tend to take their 2nd Amendment rights very seriously.

Xo4ywJDEVcs2sjWds0UHTkx4YVFFSHqB7CGUz6Sdy38.png


R.b786074039b9fd7b97df4b809f22dd30
 
I already know you don't read and understand English or it's grammar. You don't have to keep proving it, Moonbat.
Says a common grammatical dumbass who just had his ass kicked.
The language needs defending from populist prats like you.

Haw, haw...............................haw.
 
Blatant lie. RQAA.
I already know you're not going to answer the question, but I'll ask it any because exposing you a liar just doesn't seem to get old.

Here are my posts and your responses, beginning with post 19 on page 1:

Me: Yes. There basically no deaths from it.
1. You: Blatant lie.
Me: Nope and if you're going to reference the VAERS database, you're only exposing your ignorance.
2. You: No, Void. I'm not referencing VAERS.
Me: (now asking the question) Great. How many do you believe have died and what is your source?
3. You: Going back to chanting that question over and over and over and over and over? RQAA
Me: Nope. I asked once for your estimate and source. As usual, you got nothin'.
4. You: Blatant lie. RQAA.

Which of your posts, numbered for your convenience, was an answer to my request for an estimated number of deaths and your source for that estimate?
 
I already know you're not going to answer the question, but I'll ask it any because exposing you a liar just doesn't seem to get old.

Here are my posts and your responses, beginning with post 19 on page 1:

Me: Yes. There basically no deaths from it.
1. You: Blatant lie.
Me: Nope and if you're going to reference the VAERS database, you're only exposing your ignorance.
2. You: No, Void. I'm not referencing VAERS.
Me: (now asking the question) Great. How many do you believe have died and what is your source?
3. You: Going back to chanting that question over and over and over and over and over? RQAA
Me: Nope. I asked once for your estimate and source. As usual, you got nothin'.
4. You: Blatant lie. RQAA.

Which of your posts, numbered for your convenience, was an answer to my request for an estimated number of deaths and your source for that estimate?
RQAA.
 
Says a common grammatical dumbass who just had his ass kicked.
The language needs defending from populist prats like you.

Haw, haw...............................haw.
I already know you don't read and understand English or it's grammar. You don't have to keep proving it, Moonbat.
Assumption of victory fallacy.
 
Back
Top