Trump can’t appear on Sixty Minutes

archives said:
Well let’s see if the poster ^ can backup his claims

Cite at least three, and only three, “hard hitting interviews” that Trump has done this year, just three
Click to expand...
in both debates he faced hostile questioning. He also spoke at the NABJC - again taking hostile questions. that is your three

he also takes questions at press conferences - she doesn't do those things. so stop gas lighting us shit stain. you only embarrass yourself
 
archives said:
Well seeing it has been a presidential election tradition for over fifty years now that both candidates appear, kinda like candidates releasing their income tax returns, but if that isn’t enough, because nearly nine million Americans watch the show, and many of those are the independent voters you don’t get on Fox
Click to expand...
Poor anchovies,
Trump did walk into that CBS shitstorm and have the interviewer call him a liar multiple times only to find out he was correct. Remind me, have you ever heard any apology from Lelsie Stahl or anyone else at CBS?
Trump is far better off staying far away and letting Heels Up Harris make the mistakes.
 
archives said:
archives said:
Not true, certainly wasn’t any game changer, but she held her own, even when directly challenged, and by doing so exposed herself to more Americans, which was her goal
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
At this point she should Certainly be able to do more than hold her own. And I don't even think she did that... He was nursing her along and she was just not getting it...
I Truly hope a lot of people were watching...
 
zymurgy said:
Trump asked 60 minutes to apologize for lying in the last election and falsely fact checking things that were harmful to democrats

a real news program would happily set the record straight, why won't they?
Click to expand...
As they explained Trump lied about that. Trump lying is not setting the record straight. 60 Minutes explained, they ALWAYS fact check.Where do you get all the lies and misinformation?
 
zymurgy said:
in both debates he faced hostile questioning. He also spoke at the NABJC - again taking hostile questions. that is your three

he also takes questions at press conferences - she doesn't do those things. so stop gas lighting us shit stain. you only embarrass yourself
Click to expand...
Ah, debates are not interviews, and speaking to the North Alabama Bone and Joint Clinic ain’t an interview either. He hasn’t done a real press conference in years, and and we are talking this election cycle, not last decade

Thanks, your inability to name just three, three, not ten, or five, three, proves my point
 
archives said:
not if they are going to fact check, in other words, Trump can’t appear cause he would have to tell the truth, he can’t lie, “I can’t go somewhere I have to tell the truth”
Click to expand...
Who cares. All this nonsense is meaningless.

Let's fucking vote and stop babbling about nothing.
 
archives said:
I know it is foreign to you and your fellow cultist, but fact checking is a common occurrence in any real interview, and Vance knew ahead of time that any outrageous lie would be corrected, in fact, his whole not expecting to be fact checked schtick was surely orchestrated ahead of time, he had his talking point ready

Interesting how now flat out lying in a public arena to Americans is totally acceptable to the right
Click to expand...
It wasn't an "interview," it was a debate! At least you should be able to grasp the difference. Vance should have done exactly what he did and confront the moderator(s) for butting in rather than staying neutral. The so-called lie wasn't "outrageous," and worse, the moderators didn't fact check Walz on any of the crazy shit he said. It was one-sided.

Interesting how the Left (you) only sees what they want to see and calls anything they disagree with a "lie."
 
Dutch Uncle said:
He lied. You don't care if Vance lied as you already stated. You've been running around this forum having a shit fit whenever Walz lied. Why the hypocrisy, Terry?
Click to expand...
Who cares? It isn't the moderator's job to determine that. Get it through your thick skull: The moderator's job in a debate is to keep things moving, ask questions if that's the format, and STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THE ACTUAL DEBATE!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It wasn't an "interview," it was a debate! At least you should be able to grasp the difference. Vance should have done exactly what he did and confront the moderator(s) for butting in rather than staying neutral. The so-called lie wasn't "outrageous," and worse, the moderators didn't fact check Walz on any of the crazy shit he said. It was one-sided.

Interesting how the Left (you) only sees what they want to see and calls anything they disagree with a "lie."
Click to expand...
What debate at any level has ever allowed blatant lies to flow freely? Just like Trump’s debate, he was notified that a fact check may be done, and both his ans Waltz’s mikes were cut

And Vance’s reaction was orchestrated, he knew he was going to checked, he prepared his playing the victim response, and doubling down on the Trump’s Springfield lies wasn’t necessary
 
archives said:
not if they are going to fact check, in other words, Trump can’t appear cause he would have to tell the truth, he can’t lie, “I can’t go somewhere I have to tell the truth”
Click to expand...
He knows he can’t stop himself from lying
 
archives said:
What debate at any level has ever allowed blatant lies to flow freely? Just like Trump’s debate, he was notified that a fact check may be done, and both his ans Waltz’s mikes were cut

And Vance’s reaction was orchestrated, he knew he was going to checked, he prepared his playing the victim response, and doubling down on the Trump’s Springfield lies wasn’t necessary
Click to expand...
All of them where presidential candidates are concerned. The participants lie, and now, since at least CNN's Candy Crowley, the moderators do too. Walz lied as much, if not more, than Vance did but went unchecked because the moderators favored him over Vance.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It wasn't an "interview," it was a debate! At least you should be able to grasp the difference. Vance should have done exactly what he did and confront the moderator(s) for butting in rather than staying neutral. The so-called lie wasn't "outrageous," and worse, the moderators didn't fact check Walz on any of the crazy shit he said. It was one-sided.

Interesting how the Left (you) only sees what they want to see and calls anything they disagree with a "lie."
Click to expand...
The moderators stayed neutral until Vance took advantage of the no-fact-checking rule to tell lies. Very bad lies. Vance was insulted that he was called for lying. If you were not in a coma. you would have noticed they attacked Walz for things he said in the past that were not true. The Dems are not crying. Just you special rightys are.
 
Nordberg said:
The moderators stayed neutral until Vance took advantage of the no-fact-checking rule to tell lies. Very bad lies. Vance was insulted that he was called for lying. If you were not in a coma. you would have noticed they attacked Walz for things he said in the past that were not true. The Dems are not crying. Just you special rightys are.
Click to expand...
So what? Lies, or not, they shouldn't get involved. That's the bottom line. The moderators should not involve themselves in the actual debate, PERIOD!

Here's an example of what I mean:

apnews.com

FACT FOCUS: A look at false and misleading claims during the vice presidential debate

The vice presidential candidates, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Ohio Sen. JD Vance engaged in a fast-moving, largely civil debate on a wide range of issues.
apnews.com apnews.com

Very little, if anything either candidate said cited in that article is a "lie." Exaggerations, misstating numbers, or citing something different from the sources that article used. None of that amounts to a "lie," not for Vance and not for Walz. It isn't for the moderators, who are just as prone to inaccuracy and misstatement, to involved themselves in the debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top