Do you support prosecution of media critical of candidates?

We have the 1st Amendment, there can never be laws against speech - unless it is treason or inciting violence.
So will you still be backing Trump IF he gets elected again and goes on his revenge tour and puts people in jail for saying thing against him, OR shuts down MSM because they said things about him like he has said he is going to do?
Taking a LOT of peoples First Amendment rights away.
And speaking of Treason, Trump may have already committed that , BUT There is no way of telling He didn't have any other American in the rooms when he had his meetings with those 12 Russians in the W H and his meeting with Putin.
So unless one of those Russians comes forward and tells us we may never know.
But as the NSA, CIA , and FBI have said it is suspicious that there was an unexplained increase in our deep cover agents being found and some killed not soon after Trump had these meetings and now we can't get people to work for us in those capacities.
Have a nice day
 
You cry cry cry cry....big baby.
^^^
What 150 years of marrying within one's own family produces.

It's all about genetic diversity and dominant genes coupled with education, CB. You're like Legina; a genetic gimp.
 
You should not have married your 1st cousin.
Do you really believe that works above the 9th grade, CB? Or are you simply too dense to understand what I've been posting to you?

Why did you run from the genetic deformity question? Was it a little too close to home? <----pun intended. LOL
 
So will you still be backing Trump IF he gets elected again and goes on his revenge tour and puts people in jail for saying thing against him, OR shuts down MSM because they said things about him like he has said he is going to do?

Trump has been president - and did none of those things.

Komrade Kam-Kam is part of a Regime that has tried to do all of them.

 
Trump has been president - and did none of those things.

Komrade Kam-Kam is part of a Regime that has tried to do all of them.
They always conveniently forget about the existing records. I don't know if they are really that stupid or just that dishonest. Or maybe just impaired because of TDS.
 
You idiots are voting for a man who claims he will prosecute the media as president. idiots.
 
Trump has been president - and did none of those things.

Komrade Kam-Kam is part of a Regime that has tried to do all of them.
AND Trump NEVER said he was going to go after his Political opponents TILL AFTER he lost the last election.
Trump is pissed and HE said he wants to get revenge and go after HIS political opponents JUST like a DICTATOR would NOT the President of the USA.
And in doing so he will be STOMPING on a lot of AMERICANS Constitutional rights.
Trump doesn't give a shit about the CONSTITUTION he is more then willing to stomp on it and do what HE wants Fuck your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS .
AND why don't you take a class OR TWO on reading comprehension?
I said " So will you still be backing Trump IF he gets elected again and goes on his revenge tour and puts people in jail for saying thing against him, OR shuts down MSM because they said things about him like he has said he is going to do? " I NEVER SAID he did it WHEN HE WAS IN OFFICE but AFTER he lost the last election and OUT of office.
Have a nice day
 
OK, you think its libel? Or Slander?
It depends on whether it's written or verbal.

You used to pretend to be a lawyer - granted no one believed you - but....

But you have ignorantly spawned in interesting legal question - traditionally Libel is a greater form of defamation because of durability. One can slander another in a moment, and the moment passes. Only those present would hear the slander.

But with modern media, there is persistence in slander. When Rachel Maddow lies to defame Trump, her filth is captured as a stream and repeated ad nasium. Hence some courts have held that broadcasts and even podcasts, though verbal in nature, are still libel.
 
Sometimes it's both and it's not just the left that does it but they do it far more.
Example?
It depends on whether it's written or verbal.

You used to pretend to be a lawyer - granted no one believed you - but....

But you have ignorantly spawned in interesting legal question - traditionally Libel is a greater form of defamation because of durability. One can slander another in a moment, and the moment passes. Only those present would hear the slander.

But with modern media, there is persistence in slander. When Rachel Maddow lies to defame Trump, her filth is captured as a stream and repeated ad nasium. Hence some courts have held that broadcasts and even podcasts, though verbal in nature, are still libel.
I understand, but what was it in this instance?
 
He says he will do it, is that not supporting facsim?
He apparently isn't smart enough to understand Trump said he wanted to get REVENGE on his political opponents
after he was out of office .
AND AS I have said going after your Political opponents is what DICTATORS do NOT Presidents of the USA.
Have a nice day
 
Back
Top