Segregation now, segregation forever!

The point, which seems to have been buried several pages back, is that segregation was a direct violation of both Reconstruction Era civil rights acts and the 14th Amendment, because it is automatically a violation of one's civil rights.
 
The point, which seems to have been buried several pages back, is that segregation was a direct violation of both Reconstruction Era civil rights acts and the 14th Amendment, because it is automatically a violation of one's civil rights.

I'm sorry, but until the SCOTUS ruling in Brown v. Board of Ed, it certainly wasn't "automatically" a violation of any act, and had been upheld as a standard practice for decades. You can apply a 'modern' interpretation to it now, and it seems as though it would have been 'automatic' but it wasn't.

We're not arguing whether segregation IS constitutional now, that is an absurd argument, but rather, WAS segregation constitutional, and the SCOTUS ruled several times, that it was. The CRA's presented in this thread, made NO MENTION of segregation or desegregation, and were used as a basis FOR segregation, as a matter of fact. The law said blacks had to be given 'full and equal enjoyment' but it didn't stipulate it couldn't be segregated from white people. In fact, none of this was addressed until Brown, (pertaining to educational access) and it wasn't completely codified into law (pertaining to other public facilities) until the CRA of 1964.
 
Not a "schoolyard tactic" at all... I have pet names for all you pinheads, it makes my job more interesting. I call you "Chicklet" because you are a pussy boy. A liberal gay butt sex loving pussy boy, trying to sound tough by using "tai chi" in your name. I bet you don't even know tai chi, and if you do, they probably use you for the practice dummy. That would certainly explain your inability to think on your feet... or think period.



And I notice you still can't point out to me where the bill in question says one damn thing about segregation or desegregation, so we can assume you have FAILED to provide contradiction to my point, and my point stands as valid and legitimate, meaning you have hereby been PWNED by me in this debate. You can THINK it says something it doesn't say... you can keep claiming that is what it intends to say... but you are just plain wrong, because history doesn't show that any of our society thought that is what it said, only you and Jarhead.



I never stated that, you are misinterpreting what I posted. Jarhead made a statement about the phrase "any person" applying to literally "any person" regardless of circumstance or conditions, and I challenged that. The example I gave to refute his viewpoint, was criminals (any persons) who aren't allowed to exercise their right to bear arms. I understand you would love for me to be claiming that criminals have the right to bear arms, but that is not what I said, and I can't let you just LIE about that, sorry.



No, pussy boy, we are actually discussing "segregation" ...read the thread title again if you didn't catch that! Then you need to read the thread again carefully, and comprehensively, and YOU will find that you and Jarhead haven't provided evidence to support your view and I have. So you two can continue to stroke each other to orgasm if you like, to each his own, but you've not "won" a victory here for the pinheads, you've really shown what simple-minded twits you can be about something as important as Civil Rights.


"...carefully, and comprehensively..."


:rofl:

Good job
 
Taichiliberl wrote:
Chicklet: Schoolyard tactic...feminize a male opponent, and that demeans his argument...someone needs to help this David Duke wanna be grow up.

Not a "schoolyard tactic" at all... I have pet names for all you pinheads, it makes my job more interesting. I call you "Chicklet" because you are a pussy boy. A liberal gay butt sex loving pussy boy, trying to sound tough by using "tai chi" in your name. I bet you don't even know tai chi, and if you do, they probably use you for the practice dummy. That would certainly explain your inability to think on your feet... or think period.

:palm: Notice folks that this dimwit just wasted several lines (let alone the immense brain power it took him to formulate this response) to come to the SAME CONCLUSION THAT I STATED....but obviously he's not bright enough to realize this, which is another reason to pity him

ME: I am sorry but I still am not seeing where the CRA of 1875 says anything about "segregation" or "desegregation." I thought I asked you to point that out to me? Can you not hear me boy?

Taichiliberal wrote:
that's because you're either willfully ignorant and/or fucking stupid.....As I pointed out earlier, seems unless the words "ME NO LIKE SEGREGATION, SEGREGATION BAD" is printed out in bold, you seem unable or unwilling to fathom the intent or logical conclusions of the law. If there was no problem, then why enact TWO Civil Rights act to reaffirm the rights of all citizens....especially when one specifys that all will have the same rights as "white people"? You do understand what "civil rights" are in American history bunky? Simple deduction, unless you're a racist revisionist hell bent on David Duke propaganda.

And I notice you still can't point out to me where the bill in question says one damn thing about segregation or desegregation, so we can assume you have FAILED to provide contradiction to my point, and my point stands as valid and legitimate, meaning you have hereby been PWNED by me in this debate. You can THINK it says something it doesn't say... you can keep claiming that is what it intends to say... but you are just plain wrong, because history doesn't show that any of our society thought that is what it said, only you and Jarhead.

And there you have it folks.....our resident racist revisionist can not and will not use the cognitive reasoning skills that God gave him to figure out that the Civil Rights acts enacted directly affect segregation...ESPECIALLY when one of the acts specifies that all citizens will have the same rights as "white people"? That's the mindset of the revisionist racists, folks, "Well, it didn't use the word segregation, so it doesn't affect it". So I'm not just whistl'in Dixie when I point out that this guy has nothing to offer but repeating a bogus point.


ME: I know a pretty good bit about criminal code laws, and the Constitution. You and Jarhead apparently don't. The 'criminals with guns' example was given to illustrate how Jarhead was incorrect in applying a universal standard to "any persons" and that the term actually DOES have some caveats and conditions. He admitted it after further consideration, but apparently you are too stupid to admit it. I certainly am aware of why criminals can't have guns, that is precisely why I gave that example.

Taichiliberal wrote:
Again for the cheap seats....NOTHING Jarod wrote or posted alludes to the idiocy you are professing. It is YOU that insert this absurd allegation and assertion. What Jaro later agreed with you on has NOTHING to do with the assinine notion of criminals having the "right" to firearms...as they are "criminals" who have LOST certain rights by violating laws. If you'd have any knowledge of criminal code laws, you'd know that. But please, DO provide the law that states that prosecuted criminals have the right to bear arms under any state or federal statute. And spare me YOUR moronic supposition and conjecture. I'll wait.



I never stated that, you are misinterpreting what I posted. Jarhead made a statement about the phrase "any person" applying to literally "any person" regardless of circumstance or conditions, and I challenged that. The example I gave to refute his viewpoint, was criminals (any persons) who aren't allowed to exercise their right to bear arms. I understand you would love for me to be claiming that criminals have the right to bear arms, but that is not what I said, and I can't let you just LIE about that, sorry.

The "example" you gave was your own moronic supposition and conjecture...which had NOTHING to do with what Jarod previously stated. Why don't you post the FULL sentence/paragraph (in proper context) that you swear justifies your silliness? If you do, anyone with an 8th grade reading comprehension can see how YOU interject this sillliness into the conversation. So either put up or shut up!

Taichiliberal wrote:
We were originally discussing JUST TWO acts, you blithering idiot! 1866 and 1875. Go back and follow the thread as to the exchanges between Jarod, Dixie and myself....and next time READ CAREFULLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY, so you'll know what the hell is going on before your fingers hit the keys!

No, pussy boy, Oh wow, we're in grade school again! Such a devastating insult....how ever shall I go on? :rolleyes: we are actually discussing "segregation" ...read the thread title again if you didn't catch that! Then you need to read the thread again carefully, and comprehensively, and YOU will find that you and Jarhead haven't provided evidence to support your view and I have. So you two can continue to stroke each other to orgasm if you like, to each his own, but you've not "won" a victory here for the pinheads, you've really shown what simple-minded twits you can be about something as important as Civil Rights.

Notice folks, that first this joker is "taking up" for that imbecile Bravo...who incidently provided MORE evidence of Civil Rights laws against segregation and other forms of racial discrimination in America)...so he should have noted that the post I responded to Jarod and himself were specifically about the two Acts mentioned.:rolleyes: Also, since this bigoted blowhard's original subject title contention has been thoroughly deconstructed and corrected throughout the thread, he's resorted to nothing more than self aggrandizing fantasy that would do any grade schooler proud. Pity he doesn't realize that the chronology of the post will always be his undoing.
 
Who the fuck are you talking to pussy boy? You don't have an audience here, this isn't Air America, David Letterman or Keith Olbermann, no one is listening to you. What's all this "there you have it folks!" about? Do you moonlight as a barker at the carnival or something? Step right up folks, watch the biggest idiot in the world make a total ass of himself over and over... it defies logic... he is ripped and shredded before your very eyes folks! And still he comes back for more! Watch as his amazing ass is handed to him before his very eyes... it's the greatest freak show on Earth... step right up folks!

You are a fucking pathetic idiot blowhard, and I have wasted far too much of my time responding to your stupidity. Do you honestly think your petty insinuations are bothering me? Really? You are so pathetically ignorant that you presume a guy calling himself "dixie" on a message board, flying a rebel flag, is going to have his feelings hurt by you hurling racist stereotypes at him? I've heard this kind of shit my whole message board life, you nimrod, it doesn't bother me, if it did I would change my name and avatar!

You are the fucking reason I don't! It exposes racist bigot frauds like yourself, who want to make prejudiced stereotypical generalizations about people based on anything BUT the content of their character. It exposes you for the phony fraud you are, and reveals your own bigoted prejudice. I eat that up! It makes my frikkin day pussy boy! I don't have a racist bone in my body, and I don't really give two fucks what you think of me.

Since you and your ass lover can't come up with any more original material, and I have totally trounced that ass, I am done with this thread. If you want to continue making your David Duke comments about me, you just knock yourself out, pussy boy!
 
Notice folks, that first this joker is "taking up" for that imbecile Bravo...who incidently provided MORE evidence of Civil Rights laws against segregation and other forms of racial discrimination in America)...so he should have noted that the post I responded to Jarod and himself were specifically about the two Acts mentioned.:rolleyes: Also, since this bigoted blowhard's original subject title contention has been thoroughly deconstructed and corrected throughout the thread, he's resorted to nothing more than self aggrandizing fantasy that would do any grade schooler proud. Pity he doesn't realize that the chronology of the post will always be his undoing.

Who are these "folks" that you keep referring to.
They must be your parents; because no one on this board cares one iota what you think.

You're an amusement, for when we don't have each other to argue with.

Or, you could prove me wrong and supply that list of posters that take you seriously.
 
Just because Plessy v. Furgeson changed the intent of the 14th... does not mean that the writers of the 14th were not for desegeration!
 
Who the fuck are you talking to pussy boy? Oh wow, we're in grade school again! Such a devastating insult....how ever shall I go on?:rolleyes: You don't have an audience here, this isn't Air America, David Letterman or Keith Olbermann, no one is listening to you. What's all this "there you have it folks!" about? Do you moonlight as a barker at the carnival or something? Step right up folks, watch the biggest idiot in the world make a total ass of himself over and over... it defies logic... he is ripped and shredded before your very eyes folks! And still he comes back for more! Watch as his amazing ass is handed to him before his very eyes... it's the greatest freak show on Earth... step right up folks!

Obviously, someone needs to clue in our resident David Duke wanna be that people other that his fellow bigots and/or neocon parrots read these threads...so it's no stretch of the imagination or incorrect composition to address the reader(s). Evidently, the stress of watching his revisionist claptrap being logically dismantled has ripped the hinges of his fragile mind, thus resulting in this latest raving.

You are a fucking pathetic idiot blowhard, and I have wasted far too much of my time responding to your stupidity. Typical BS thrown out by a defeated racist/neocon BS artist. Yet you can bet your bottom dollar that he'll post a comment on my future postings. Do you honestly think your petty insinuations are bothering me? Really? You are so pathetically ignorant that you presume a guy calling himself "dixie" on a message board, flying a rebel flag, is going to have his feelings hurt by you hurling racist stereotypes at him? I've heard this kind of shit my whole message board life, you nimrod, it doesn't bother me, if it did I would change my name and avatar!
My, my.... me thinks thou dost protest too much! :cof1:

You are the fucking reason I don't! It exposes racist bigot frauds like yourself, who want to make prejudiced stereotypical generalizations about people based on anything BUT the content of their character. It exposes you for the phony fraud you are, and reveals your own bigoted prejudice. I eat that up! It makes my frikkin day pussy boy! I don't have a racist bone in my body, and I don't really give two fucks what you think of me. Right....a guy who is consistently trying to portray blacks as being stupid enough to be "held captive" by a Democratic party that according to him is STILL being run by Dixiecrats before 1968, a guy who consistently states that black folk during slavery/segregationist times didn't rise up too many protests because they accepted the status quo (look it up people, I'm serious...this is what this dope professed), who claims that Civil Right Act that specifically points to all having the same rights as "white people" has NOTHING to do with segregation and who has continually tried to separate the Confederate flag from it's racists roots doesn't "..have a racist bone..." in his body. :rolleyes: Yeah, and some of his best friends are black! Now you know why I call him a David Duke wanna be!
Since you and your ass lover can't come up with any more original material, and I have totally trounced that ass, I am done with this thread. If you want to continue making your David Duke comments about me, you just knock yourself out, pussy boy!

Bottom line: I challenged him to provide the quote to which he claims Jarod made regarding criminals and the 2nd amendment. Since he couldn't, he bluffs and blusters and then runs away. No unexpected....little racist SOS like Dixie never really can go the distance without blowing up! His nonsense about the 1866 & 1875 Civil Rights Act was proving wrong...his nonsense about guns and criminals was proving wrong.....his subject title and opening post was proven wrong....Poor little Dixie, destroyed in useless defiance like his namesake. :cof1: I won't shed a tear!
 
Bottom line: I challenged him to provide the quote to which he claims Jarod made regarding criminals and the 2nd amendment. Since he couldn't, he bluffs and blusters and then runs away. No unexpected....little racist SOS like Dixie never really can go the distance without blowing up! His nonsense about the 1866 & 1875 Civil Rights Act was proving wrong...his nonsense about guns and criminals was proving wrong.....his subject title and opening post was proven wrong....Poor little Dixie, destroyed in useless defiance like his namesake. :cof1: I won't shed a tear!

Hey sissie; he said LISTENED, you said READ.

You do realize that there is a difference, you moron.
 
Dix owned again... Conservatives this is the face of the right wing of your party... Do something about it!
 
Fine, I'll go get my gun... :orang:

NOt a call to violence, just stand up to this crap when you see it. Point out that this is not what you support. POint out that this type of ignorance is not the hart of the Republican party, because if you dont it will be!
 
The Glenville Shootout was a series of events of violent acts that occurred in the Glenville section of Cleveland, Ohio, United States, from the dates of July 23—July 28, 1968. The violent acts resulted in the deaths of seven people, and injuries of fifteen others.


The shootout began on the evening of July 23, 1968 in the eastern section of the Glenville neighborhood when two civilian tow truck drivers, wearing uniforms similar to police uniforms, were shot in an ambush by heavily armed snipers while checking an abandoned car. Cleveland police officers were also watching Fred "Ahmed" Evans and his radical militant group, who were suspected of purchasing illegal weapons. The shootout attracted a large crowd that was mostly black, young, and "hostile". When it became clear that the police were ill-equipped to handle the situation, Mayor Carl B. Stokes called in the National Guard. Before the night was over, seven were dead (three of the seven were Cleveland Police officers) and fifteen were wounded.


The following day, Stokes decided to remove all the White police officers from Glenville stationing only African American police officers and community leaders in the predominantly black community, to prevent further rioting and ease tensions in the area. It was the first event in American history in which only African American police officers were sent in to deal with a violent riot or confrontation. While the police and community leaders prevented any more deaths from occurring, there was continued looting and arson throughout the six-square-mile area. On July 25, more police officers and the National Guard entered Glenville and by July 28, order was restored.

-----------------------------------------

The Omaha Race Riot occurred in Omaha, Nebraska, on 28-September 29, 1919. The race riot resulted in the brutal lynching of Will Brown, a black worker; the death of two white men; the attempted hanging of the mayor Edward Parsons Smith; and a public rampage by thousands of whites who set fire to the Douglas County Courthouse in downtown Omaha. It followed more than 20 race riots that occurred in major industrial cities of the United States during the Red Summer of 1919.

Three weeks before the riot, federal investigators had noted that "a clash was imminent owing to ill-feeling between white and black workers in the stockyards."[1] The number of blacks in Omaha doubled during the decade 1910-1920, as they were recruited to work in the meatpacking industry, and competing workers noticed. In 1910 Omaha had the third largest black population among the new western cities that had become destinations following Reconstruction. By 1920 the black population more than doubled to more than 10,000, second only to Los Angeles with nearly 16,000. It was ahead of San Francisco and Oakland, Topeka and Denver.[2] [3]

The major meatpacking plants hired blacks as strikebreakers in 1917. Hostility against them was high among working class whites in the city, who were mostly Catholic immigrants of southern and eastern Europe, or descendants of immigrants, and who lived chiefly in South Omaha. Ethnic Irish were among the largest and earliest group of immigrants and they established their own power base in the city by this time. Several years earlier following the death of an Irish policeman, ethnic Irish led a mob in an attack on Greektown, which drove the Greek community from Omaha.[4]

With the moralistic administration of first-term reform mayor Edward Parsons Smith, the city's criminal establishment led by Tom Dennison created a formidable challenge in cahoots with the Omaha Business Men's Association. Smith trudged through his reform agenda with little support from the Omaha City Council or the city's labor unions. Along with several strikes throughout the previous year, on September 11 two detectives with the Omaha Police Department's "morals squad" shot and killed an African American bellhop.[5]
Lynching victim Will Brown.

The violence associated with the lynching of Will Brown was triggered by reports in local media that sensationalized the alleged rape of 19-year-old Agnes Loebeck on September 25, 1919. The following day the police arrested 40-year-old Will Brown as a suspect. Loebeck identified Brown as her rapist, although later reports by the Omaha Police Department and the United States Army stated that she had not made a positive identification. There was an unsuccessful attempt to lynch Brown on the day of his arrest.

The Omaha Bee publicized the incident as one of a series of alleged attacks on white women by black men. The newspaper had carried a series of sensational articles alleging many incidents of black outrages.[6] The Bee was controlled by a political machine opposed to the newly elected reform administration of Mayor Edward Smith. It highlighted alleged incidents of "black criminality" to embarrass the new administration.[citation needed]
[edit] Beginning

At about 2:00 p.m. on Sunday, September 28, 1919, a large group of white youths gathered near the Bancroft School in South Omaha and began a march to the Douglas County Courthouse, where Brown was being held. The march was intercepted by John T. Dunn, chief of the Omaha Detective Bureau, and his subordinates. Dunn attempted to disperse the crowd, but they ignored his warning and marched on. Thirty police officers were guarding the court house when the marchers arrived. By 4:00 p.m., the crowd had grown much larger. Members of the crowd bantered with the officers until the police were convinced that the crowd posed no serious threat. A report to that effect was made to the central police station, and the captain in charge sent fifty reserve officers home for the day.
[edit] Riot

By 5:00 p.m., a mob of about 4,000 whites had crowded into the street on the south side of the Douglas County Courthouse. They began to assault the police officers, pushing one through a pane of glass in a door and attacking two others who had wielded clubs at the mob. At 5:15 p.m., officers deployed fire hoses to dispel the crowd, but they responded with a shower of bricks and sticks. Nearly every window on the south side of the courthouse was broken. The crowd stormed the lower doors of the courthouse, and the Police inside discharged their weapons down an elevator shaft in an attempt to frighten them, but this further incited the mob. They again rushed the police who were standing guard outside the building, broke through their lines, and entered the courthouse through a broken basement door.

It was at this moment that Marshal Eberstein, chief of police, arrived. He asked leaders of the mob to give him a chance to talk to the crowd. He mounted to one of the window sills. Beside him was a recognized chief of the mob. At the request of its leader, the crowd stilled its clamor for a few minutes. Chief Eberstein tried to tell the mob that its mission would best be served by letting justice take its course. The crowd refused to listen. Its members howled so that the chief's voice did not carry more than a few feet. Eberstein ceased his attempt to talk and entered the besieged building.
A crowd of people forming the riot

By 6 p.m., throngs swarmed about the court house on all sides. The crowd wrestled revolvers, badges and caps from policemen. They chased and beat every colored person who ventured into the vicinity. White men who attempted to rescue innocent blacks from unmerited punishment were subjected to physical abuse. The police had lost control of the crowd.

By 7 p.m., most of the policemen had withdrawn to the interior of the court house. There, they joined forces with Michael Clark, sheriff of Douglas County, who had summoned his deputies to the building with the hope of preventing the capture of Brown. The policemen and sheriffs formed their line of last resistance on the fourth floor of the court house.

The police were not successful in their efforts. Before 8 p.m., they discovered that the crowd had set the courthouse building on fire. Its leaders had tapped a nearby gasoline filling station and saturated the lower floors with the flammable liquid.
[edit] Escalation

Shots were fired as the mob pillaged hardware stores in the business district and entered pawnshops, seeking firearms. Police records showed that more than 1,000 revolvers and shotguns were stolen that night. The mob shot at any policeman; seven officers received gunshot wounds, although none of the wounds were serious.
Windows broken out, people climbing the building

Louis Young, 16 years old, was fatally shot in the stomach while leading a gang up to the fourth floor of the building. Witnesses said the youth was the most intrepid of the mob's leaders.

Pandemonium reigned outside the building. At Seventeenth and Douglas Streets, one block from the court house, James Hiykel, a 34-year-old businessman, was shot and killed.

The crowd continued to strike the courthouse with bullets and rocks. Spectators were shot. Participants inflicted minor wounds upon themselves. Women were thrown to the ground and trampled. Blacks were dragged from streetcars and beaten.
[edit] The first hanging

About 11 o'clock, when the frenzy was at its height, Mayor Edward Smith came out of the east door of the courthouse into Seventeenth Street. He had been in the burning building for hours. As he emerged from the doorway, a shot rang out.

"He shot me. Mayor Smith shot me," a young man in the uniform of a United States soldier yelled. The crowd surged toward the mayor. He fought them. One man hit the mayor on the head with a baseball bat. Another slipped the noose of a rope around his neck. The crowd started to drag him away.

"If you must hang somebody, then let it be me," the mayor said.

The mob dragged the mayor into Harney Street. A woman reached out and tore the noose from his neck. Men in the mob replaced it. Spectators wrestled the mayor from his captors and placed him in a police automobile. The throng overturned the car and grabbed him again. Once more, the rope encircled the mayor's neck. He was carried to Sixteenth and Harney Streets. There he was hanged from the metal arm of a traffic signal tower.

Mayor Smith was suspended in the air when State Agent Ben Danbaum drove a high-powered automobile into the throng right to the base of the signal tower. In the car with Danbaum were City Detectives Al Anderson, Charles Van Deusen and Lloyd Toland. They grasped the mayor and Russell Norgard untied the noose. The detectives brought the mayor to Ford Hospital. There he lingered between life and death for several days, finally recovering. "They shall not get him. Mob rule will not prevail in Omaha," the mayor kept muttering during his delirium.
[edit] Siege of the Court House

Meanwhile the plight of the police in the court house had become desperate. The fire had licked its way to the third floor. The officers faced the prospect of roasting to death. Appeals for help to the crowd below brought only bullets and curses. The mob frustrated all attempts to raise ladders to the imprisoned police. "Bring Brown with you and you can come down," somebody in the crowd shouted.

On the second floor of the building, three policemen and a newspaper reporter were imprisoned in a safety vault, whose thick metal door the mob had shut. The four men hacked their way out through the court house wall. The mob shot at them as they squirmed out of the stifling vault.
Flames rage into the night from the Court House

The gases of formaldehyde added to the terrors of the men imprisoned within the flaming building. Several jars of the powerful chemical had burst on the stairway. Its deadly fumes mounted to the upper floors. Two policemen were overcome. Their companions could do nothing to alleviate their sufferings.

Sheriff Clark led his prisoners (there were 121 of them) to the roof. Will Brown, for whom the mob was howling, became hysterical. Blacks, fellow prisoners of the hunted man, tried to throw him off the roof. Deputy Sheriffs Hoye and McDonald foiled the attempt.

Sheriff Clark ordered that female prisoners be taken from the building due to their distress. They ran down the burning staircases clad only in prison pajamas. Some of them fainted on the way. Members of the mob escorted them through the smoke and flames. Black women as well as white women were helped to safety.

The mob poured more gasoline into the building. They cut every line of hose that firemen laid from nearby hydrants. The flames were rapidly lapping their way upward. It seemed like certain cremation for the prisoners and their protectors.
[edit] Lynching
Will Brown is lynched, and his body mutilated and burned by a white crowd.
Photograph taken from a different angle showing the body of Will Brown after being burned by a white crowd.

Then three slips of paper were thrown from the fourth floor on the west side of the building. On one piece was scrawled: "The judge says he will give up Negro Brown. He is in dungeon. There are 100 white prisoners on the roof. Save them."

Another note read: "Come to the fourth floor of the building and we will hand the negro over to you."

The mob in the street shrieked its delight at the last message. Boys and young men placed firemen's ladders against the building. They mounted to the second story. One man had a heavy coil of new rope on his back. Another had a shotgun.

Two or three minutes after the unidentified athletes had climbed to the fourth floor, a mighty shout and a fusillade of shots were heard from the south side of the building.

Will Brown had been captured. A few minutes more and his lifeless body was hanging from a telephone post at Eighteenth and Harney Streets. Hundreds of revolvers and shotguns were fired at the corpse as it dangled in mid-air. Then, the rope was cut. Brown's body was tied to the rear end of an automobile. It was dragged through the streets to Seventeenth and Dodge Streets, four blocks away. The oil from red lanterns used as danger signals for street repairs was poured on the corpse. It was burned. Members of the mob hauled the charred remains through the business district for several hours.

Sheriff Clark said that Negro prisoners hurled Brown into the hands of the mob as its leaders approached the stairway leading to the county jail. Newspapers have quoted alleged leaders of the mob as saying that Brown was shoved at them through a blinding smoke by persons whom they could not see.
[edit] Aftermath

The lawlessness continued for several hours after Brown had been lynched. The police patrol was burned. The police emergency automobile was burned. Three times, the mob went to the city jail. The third time its leaders announced that they were going to burn it. Soldiers arrived before they could carry out their threat.
Infantry deployed to calm the riot

The riot lasted until 3 a.m., in the morning of September 29. At that hour, federal troops, under command of Colonel John E. Morris of the Twentieth Infantry, arrived from Fort Omaha and Fort Crook. Troops manning machine guns were placed in the heart of Omaha's business district; in North Omaha, the center of the black community, to protect citizens there; and in South Omaha, to prevent more mobs from forming. Major General Leonard Wood, commander of the Central Department, came the next day to Omaha by order of Secretary of War Newton D. Baker. Peace was enforced by 1,600 soldiers.

Martial law was not formally proclaimed in Omaha, but it was effectively enacted throughout the city. By the request of City Commissioner W.G. Ure, who was acting mayor, Wood took over control over the police department, too.

On October 1, 1919 Brown was laid to rest in Omaha's Potters Field. The interment log listed only one word next to his name: "Lynched".
---------------------------------------------

Joe Coe, also known as George Smith, was an African-American laborer who was lynched in 1891 in Omaha, Nebraska. Overwhelmed by a mob of one thousand at the Douglas County Courthouse, the twelve city police officers stood by without intervening. Afterward, the mayor called the lynching "the most deplorable thing that has ever happened in the history of the country."[1]
Contents
[hide]

* 1 About
* 2 Aftermath
* 3 See also
* 4 External links
* 5 References

[edit] About

Coe was a married man with two children who lived on North 12th Street north of downtown Omaha. On October 7, 1891 Lizzie Yates, a five-year-old white child who also lived in North Omaha, accused Coe of assaulting her. A crowd of men was already gathered at the old Douglas County Courthouse the day when Coe was brought in, to witness an unrelated, scheduled hanging, an official execution.

In the crowd, rumors circulated that the girl had died and the suspect's punishment was only 20 years in jail. Having seen Coe brought in earlier, the crowd decided he was guilty. Rumors flew around Omaha that the girl had died, the guilty party was in jail, and was only going to be punished with 20 years' incarceration.[2]

The next day, a mob of several hundred to 1,000 men formed in downtown Omaha early on Saturday, October 10, and overwhelmed the police at the courthouse.[3] Councilman Moriarty drove his cane through a window and led the men against the courthouse.[4] Leaders drove Coe to the assumed victim's house in the Near North Side neighborhood to be identified by the parents. The mother immediately said she had seen Coe roaming around the house, although she would not swear that it was he.[5]

When the mob brought Coe back to the courthouse to be lynched, James E. Boyd, the governor of Nebraska, and the county sheriff both appealed to the men to disperse. Instead, by midnight a crowd of 1,000 to 10,000 people had gathered at the courthouse.[6] The mob beat Coe and dragged him through city streets. He was probably already dead when he was hung from a streetcar wire at 17th and Harney Streets.[7] Omaha mayor Richard C. Cushing quickly condemned the lynching as "the most deplorable thing that has ever happened in the history of the country."[8]
[edit] Aftermath

Seven men were arrested for the crime, including the chief of police and the manager of a large dry goods store. A mob gathered outside the jail and threatened to destroy it unless the suspects were freed on bail but the County Attorney was determined to refuse them.[9]

The following day when Coe's body was set for public viewing at a downtown mortuary, six thousand spectators filed by. Hucksters sold pieces of the lynching rope as souvenirs.[10]

Ten days after the lynching, the Douglas County Assistant Coroner testified in court that Smith died of "fright", rather than of the wounds inflicted on him by the mob. Those wounds included sixteen wounds to his body and three vertebrae broken in his spine. Despite this, the coroner testified, "[T]he heart was so contracted and the blood was in such a condition that the doctor was satisfied that the man was literally scared to death." County Attorney Mahoney said he would have to modify the charges against the lynchers.[11] The grand jury decided not to prosecute.

----------------------------------------------

Johnny "Jack" Trice (1902 – October 8, 1923) was a football player who became the first African-American athlete from Iowa State College (now Iowa State University). Trice died due to injuries suffered during a college football game against the University of Minnesota on October 6, 1923.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Background
* 2 The game, Trice's death, and aftermath
* 3 Legacy
* 4 See also
* 5 References
* 6 Further reading
* 7 External links

[edit] Background

Trice was born in Hiram, Ohio in 1902, the son of a former slave and Buffalo Soldier. As a child, Trice was active in sports and demonstrated outstanding athletic skills. In 1918, Trice’s mother sent him to Cleveland, Ohio to live with an uncle. Trice attended East Technical High School where he played football. In 1922, Trice followed five of his teammates, as well as his former high school coach, Sam Willaman, to Iowa State College in Ames, Iowa.

While attending Iowa State, Trice participated in track and football (primarily as a tackle). He majored in animal husbandry, with the desire to go to the South after graduation, and use his knowledge to help African-American farmers. In the summer after his freshman year, Trice married Cora Mae Starland. They both found jobs in order to support themselves through school.

On October 5, 1923, the night before his first college football game, Trice wrote the following in a letter on stationery at a racially segregated hotel in Minneapolis/St. Paul (the letter was later found in Trice's suit just before his funeral):
“ My thoughts just before the first real college game of my life: The honor of my race, family & self is at stake. Everyone is expecting me to do big things. I will. My whole body and soul are to be thrown recklessly about the field tomorrow. Every time the ball is snapped, I will be trying to do more than my part. On all defensive plays I must break through the opponents' line and stop the play in their territory. Beware of mass interference. Fight low, with your eyes open and toward the play. Watch out for crossbacks and reverse end runs. Be on your toes every minute if you expect to make good. Jack.[1] ”
[edit] The game, Trice's death, and aftermath

On October 6, 1923, Trice and his Iowa State College teammates played against the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It was ISU's third game that season; St. Louis refused to play against a black player. On the night of the game, Trice had to stay at a different Minneapolis hotel from his teammates.

During the second play of the game, Trice's collarbone was broken. Trice insisted he was all right and returned to the game. In the third quarter, while attempting to tackle a University of Minnesota ball carrier by throwing a roll block, Trice was trampled by three Minnesota players. Although he claimed to be fine, Trice was removed from the game and sent to a Minneapolis hospital. The doctors declared him fit to travel and he returned by train to Ames with his teammates. On October 8, 1923, Trice died from hemorrhaged lungs and internal bleeding as a result of the injuries sustained during the game.

Trice's funeral was held at the Iowa State College's central campus in Ames on October 16, 1923, with 4,000 students and faculty members in attendance.

As a result of his death, ISU did not renew their contract to play against Minnesota after the 1924 game. They would not play again until 1989.

(to be continued...)
 
Raymond Gunn (January 11, 1904-January 12, 1931) was a black man killed by a mob in Maryville, Missouri, United States, after he confessed to killing and attempting to rape a white school teacher there.

The case received massive national publicity because it occurred outside the Southern lynch belt and because of its brazen and planned nature; and because the sheriff did not activate National Guard troops which had been specifically deployed to prevent the lynching.

The case was frequently invoked in the unsuccessful attempt to pass a law called the Wagner-Costigan Act during the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt. This would have made it a federal crime for law enforcement officials to refuse to take steps to prevent a lynching.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Early life
* 2 Murder of Velma Colter
* 3 Lynch mob atmosphere
* 4 The lynching
* 5 Aftermath
* 6 References
* 7 External links

[edit] Early life

Gunn was born to a local family in Maryville.

Gunn was convicted of attempted rape in September 1925, of a student at what is now Northwest Missouri State University after he accosted a woman on a rural lane outside of Maryville. Gunn never confessed to the crime, although he was allegedly beaten while in custody. He was released on January 28, 1928.

In 1929 he married a local woman and the couple moved to Omaha, Nebraska where she died of pneumonia. He returned to Maryville where he made a living as a hunter.[1]
[edit] Murder of Velma Colter

On December 16, 1930, 20-year-old teacher Velma Colter, who was the daughter of a local farm couple, was killed in the one-room Garrett schoolhouse (40°19′56.22″N 94°54′40.05″W / 40.3322833°N 94.911125°W / 40.3322833; -94.911125) about a mile southwest of Maryville. When she didn't return home as scheduled, her partially clad body was found in a pool of blood in the middle of the school and there was a bloody footprint.

Gunn was immediately suspected. A farmer said that he saw somebody matching Gunn's description near the school. Authorities arrested several black men matching the description before finding Gunn on December 18. Gunn had blood on his shirt (which he claimed was rabbit blood) and his footprint matched the one at the scene. Furthermore, Gunn had a severe bite mark on his thumb (the woman who had accused him of rape in 1925 said he stuck his thumbs in her mouth).

Gunn confessed, saying he had gone to the school with a hedge club after seeing Colter outside with a coal bucket. He said he hit her once after she bit him and then again after she hit him with the coal bucket.
[edit] Lynch mob atmosphere

Talk of lynching began immediately after Gunn was taken into custody on December 18, and crowds began to assemble in Maryville. Gunn was transferred to the Buchanan County, Missouri jail 45 miles south in St. Joseph, Missouri. Crowds gathered there as well, which prompted the sheriff to order a truck with a mounted machine gun to be backed to the door. The operator of the gun appeared to aim the weapon at the crowd (although he later said he was just oiling it) causing the crowd to disperse.

Gunn was transferred again, this time 100 miles south of Maryville to Kansas City, Missouri. At 3:30 a.m. on December 26, Gunn returned to Maryville for arraignment and then was taken back to Kansas City.

Colter's mother was quoted as saying she could not bear a trial and would not testify. Her son had been killed in France during World War I.
[edit] The lynching

Gunn's court date was set for January 12. The Nodaway County prosecuting attorney said Gunn would get a fair trial and appealed (along with many Maryville business leaders) to Missouri Governor Henry S. Caulfield to deploy the National Guard to prevent an anticipated lynching attempt. Caulfield complied and 60 troops were ordered at 7:30 a.m. to stand by at the National Guard a block north of the courthouse (at what today is the Maryville Public Library). By law, the National Guard could only be deployed at the written request of the sheriff, which was never made. Sheriff Havre English later told the press that he did not call up the guard because he did not want them to get hurt.

A large crowd occupied the Maryville square between the jail block to the northeast and the Nodaway County, Missouri courthouse. The sheriff was transporting Gunn by car, and drove directly into the mob. When he opened the door, a man pulled the sheriff aside and another took Gunn out of the car. Men who were there had said year's later that the leader bluntly said to the sheriff "either you move out of the way or die with this man, either way he's going to die today."

Gunn was chained and marched south down Main Street through the Maryville streets (avoiding the National Guardsmen). After an hour and a half, Gunn and the crowd arrived at the Garrett schoolhouse. His ears and nose were bleeding. The contents of the schoolhouse had been removed and placed on the lawn. A crowd estimated at between 2,000 and 4,000 had gathered. He was taken by 12 men inside the schoolhouse, where he is reported to have confessed again, as well as claiming he had an accomplice named "Shike" Smith.

Gunn was taken to the roof of the building where he was tied to a ridge pole. Gunn and the building were doused with gasoline. The leader of the group, only identified as a "man in a red coat", threw a lighted piece of paper into the building. Gunn screamed once and appeared lifeless in 11 minutes.

A reporter for the St. Joseph Gazette gave this description:

He twisted and revealed a huge blister ballooning on his left upper arm. Pieces of his skin blew away to the wind as the blistering heat became more intense and soon his torso was splotched with white patches of exposed flesh. His hair burned like a torch for moment then his head sagged. His body writhed. It took the appearance of a mummy.[2]

The building's roof collapsed within 16 minutes. Remnants of the school were taken away by the crowd as souvenirs.
[edit] Aftermath

No charges were ever filed in the case. Attempts to identify the man in the red coat have always been rebuffed with a claim that he was an outsider. However newspapers said all the other leaders were local.[3]

The lynching was universally condemned by newspapers across the United States. The Atlanta Constitution published an editorial cartoon with the caption of "The Torch of Civilization in Missouri."[4]

Residents were concerned that blacks from Kansas City were going to attack the city. Reportedly townspeople set up machine gun nests on Main Street.

Gunn's family home was also burned.[5]

The official 1930 census showed 90 blacks living in the town. 35 were enrolled in the Maryville school in 1930. In 1931, the number had dropped to six and eventually almost all blacks left the town.

(to be continued...)
 
What does any of this have to do with the fact that there were powerfull people in Congress who wrote, promoted, voted for and supported the Desegregation act of 1875?
 
Ossian Sweet (pronounced /ˈɒʃən ˈswiːt/, us dict: ŏsh′·ən swēt′; 30 October 1895–20 March 1960) was an American physician. He is most notable for his self defense in 1925 of his newly-purchased home in a predominantly white neighborhood against a mob attempting to force him out of the neighborhood in Detroit, Michigan, and the subsequent acquittal by an all-white jury of murder charges against him, his family, and friends who helped defend his home, in what came to be known as the Sweet Trials.

Ossian Sweet and The Red Summer

Ossian Sweet was attending Howard University, a leader in black medical education, in 1919 when he personally witnessed the Washington D.C. race riot. Like so many cities in the summer of 1919, Washington D.C. had been stretched to its breaking point. Black migrants from the south had come pouring into the city's main black areas with the promise of wartime jobs, but in 1919 with the end of the war the promise was no longer there, although new migrants were pouring into the city everyday. Thousands of white soldiers were held on the outskirts of Washington D.C. while waiting to be discharged from their service in the World War I. Boredom eventually hit; and when it did, a riot broke that lasted five days and left 6 dead and 150 wounded. Sweet was just four blocks from the riots, but could not leave his fraternity; Kevin Boyle, author of Arc of Justice: A Saga of Race, Civil Rights, and Murder in the Jazz Age, attributes his lack of composure in this harsh time to fear, and he had good reason. Sweet was “walking down the street when a gang descended on a passing streetcar, pulled a black passenger down to the sidewalk, and beat him mercilessly.” Boyle later states that Sweet did not venture from his house because he was escaping the memories of his past, a true emotion for Sweet, and one that would not leave him until his death.

Home invasion

There were dangerous occurrences happening to friends and acquaintances of Ossian in buying homes in white neighborhoods and then being attacked. There was even a group put together called the Waterworks Park Improvement, which happened to be run by real estate agents from Detroit and nearby cities, whose sole reason of existence was to create controversy against the idea of allowing blacks to move to white neighborhoods. These people were concerned with the belief that allowing blacks into their neighborhoods would lower property values. This was important because at this time, buying a home was a very difficult and lengthy process. The idea of buying land free and clear was no longer an option for most blacks, forcing them instead to take out multiple mortgages to buy a home, leading to even more debt. Also, the idea that an African American could afford what most were struggling to keep was insulting to many of the working class whites that lived in the neighborhood.

Fearing an attack, Ossian had nine other men at his house on the night of the attack to help defend his family and property should any violence arise. The men included: Charles Washington (insurance man), Leonard Morse (colleague), William Davis, Henry Sweet (Ossian's brother), John Latting (Henry's college friend), Norris Murray (handyman), Otis Sweet (Ossian's brother) and Joe Mack (chauffeur). Gladys, too, was inside the bungalow. Inspector Norton Schuknecht had been placed outside the Sweet's house on the first night and he was to keep the peace and protect Ossian and Gladys from any angry neighbors. When a mob formed for the second night in a row in front of Dr. Sweet’s home, he knew that, “Somewhere out there, standing among the women and children, lounging on the porches, lurking in the alleys were the men who would incite the crowd to violence.” As the mob grew restless, people began to throw stones at the house, which eventually broke an upstairs window. There were several of Dr. Sweet’s friends waiting upstairs, armed with weapons that Sweet had purchased prior to moving in. A volley of shots rang out from the upstairs, and in an instant, two attackers were down. One member of the mob, Eric Houghberg, was shot and suffered a minor injury. The other man who was hit, Leon Breiner, was killed from the shot. There was no turning back at this point, as a white man lay dead in the street, killed by an African American man. After the shot had been fired from the bungalow, the eleven African Americans inside were brought to police headquarters and interrogated for five hours. Interrogations would last for an extended period of time and the men would remain in the Wayne County Jail until the entire trial was over. By the next morning, September 10, the story was on newsstands all across Detroit and throughout the country.

The Sweets and their friends were tried for murder by a young Judge, Frank Murphy. Judge Murphy was considered to be one of the more liberal judges in the city, but with the media working the city into a frenzy, Murphy decided to put aside his liberal ideals and denied the defendant’s appeal to have the case dismissed. There was little hope of receiving a fair trial at this point, but Ossian Sweet and his friends remained hopeful. When word of this incident reached the desk of James Weldon Johnson, general secretary of the NAACP, Johnson knew right away that this case would be a major force in the acquisition of civil rights for African Americans.

With the help of the NAACP, Sweet and his friends gained the money and support that they needed, if there was to be any hope of winning this trial. The NAACP helped the Sweets and the rest as much as possible; they had James Weldon Johnson send Walter White to them in order to do some of his legendary investigations work. The Sweet trial was one of three main trials the NAACP supported in this year. The NAACP chose carefully which trials would have the most publicity and which trials, if won, would help the African American race and hopefully make steps towards social change. Funds were limited, and the selection of civil rights battles had to be chosen carefully to maximize the limited funds that were available.

As September passed on, life in the Wayne County Jail became slightly more comfortable for Ossian and the others. It was more difficult for jail officers to keep a close eye on them so the Sweets began seeing a steady stream of visitors, including the elder Henry Sweet, who was Ossian's, Otis's and Henry's father. In early October, Johnson invited Clarence Darrow, who was for a period of time the most brilliant defense attorney in the country, to join the Sweets' defense team. Darrow previously had been an attorney in the Scopes Trial. Publicity was what Johnson was looking for from Darrow. Darrow accepted and on October 15 it was announced he would be taking control of the defense. Several days prior to the announcement, on October 6, Gladys was released on bail by her parents' friends. This was a great relief for Ossian. On the morning of Friday, October 30, Clarence Darrow was ready for trial. As the end of November rolled in, and after the jurors' long deliberations, most came to an agreement that the eight remaining defendants should be acquitted; there were however, a few holdouts. At this point, Judge Murphy dismissed the deadlocked jury and declared the court case a mistrial. Dr. Sweet and Gladys had expectations to head back to court within a few weeks, but there were delays. During the long delay between the first and second trial, Darrow did not devote much time to the Sweets' case. Eventually, almost three weeks after it was planned, the trial began on Monday, April 19, 1926. This shorter trial led to an acquittal of Henry Sweet. The prosecuting attorney then elected to dismiss the charges against the remaining defendants.

After Henry was acquitted, life for the Sweets was not as joyous as hoped. Both Gladys and her daughter, Iva, were suffering from tuberculosis, which Gladys contracted during her incarceration. Two months after Iva's second birthday, she died. During the two years following the loss of their daughter, Ossian and Gladys lived apart; he was back at the apartment near Dunbar Memorial and she went to Tucson, Arizona, in order to benefit from the drier climate. By mid-1928, Ossian finally regained possession of the bungalow, which had not been lived in since the shooting. A few months after Gladys returned home, she died, at the age of twenty-seven. After the death of his wife, Ossian bought the Garafalo's Drugstore. In 1929, he left his practice to run a hospital in the heart of the ghetto. He would eventually run a few of these small hospitals, but none ever flourished. As he began to approach the age of fifty, Ossian started to buy land in East Bartow, as his father had. Finally, in 1930, he decided to run for the presidency of the NAACP branch in Detroit, only to lose by a wide margin. In the summer of 1939, Ossian realized that his brother had also contracted tuberculosis; six months later, he died. By this point, Ossian's finances soon failed him. It took him until 1950 to pay off the land contract and he then assumed full ownership of the bungalow. He faced too much debt after that and, instead of losing the house, Ossian sold it in April 1958, to another black family. With the bungalow out of his possession, he transformed what had been his office above Garafalo's Drugstore into an apartment. Around this time, Ossian's physical and mental health began to decline; he had put on weight and had slowed in his motions. On March 20, 1960, he went into his bedroom and committed suicide with a shot to the head.

----------------------------------------------

The "Johnny Bright Incident" was a violent on-field assault against African-American player Johnny Bright by White American player Wilbanks Smith during an American college football game held on October 20, 1951 in Stillwater, Oklahoma. The game was significant in itself as it marked the first time that an African American athlete with a national profile and of critical importance to the success of his Drake University team had played against Oklahoma A&M (now Oklahoma State University) on their home field. Bright's injury also highlighted the racial tensions of the times and assumed notoriety when it was captured in what was later to become both a widely disseminated and eventually Pulitzer Prize winning photo sequence. The event later came to be known as the "Johnny Bright Incident".

Johnny Bright's participation as a halfback/quarterback in the collegiate football game between the Drake Bulldogs and Oklahoma A&M Aggies on October 20, 1951 at Lewis Field was controversial even before it began. Bright had been the first African-American football player to play at Lewis Field two years prior (without incident). In 1951, Bright was a pre-season Heisman Trophy candidate from Drake, and led the nation in total offense.[1] Bright had never played for a losing team in his college career. Coming into the contest, Drake carried a five game winning streak, owing much to Bright's rushing and passing abilities. During the first seven minutes of the game, Bright was knocked unconscious three times by blows from Oklahoma A&M defensive tackle Wilbanks Smith. While Smith's final elbow blow broke Bright's jaw, he was still able to complete a 61-yard touchdown pass to Drake halfback Jim Pilkington a few plays later.[1] Soon afterward, the injury finally forced him to leave the game. Bright finished the game with less than 100 yards, the first time in his three year collegiate career at Drake. Oklahoma A&M eventually won the game 27–14.[1]

Bob Spiegel, a reporter with the Des Moines Register, interviewed several spectators after the game, eventually publishing a report on the incident in the October 30, 1951 issue of the newspaper. According to Spiegel's report, several of the Oklahoma A&M students he interviewed overheard an Oklahoma A&M coach repeatedly say "Get that nigger" whenever the A&M practice squad ran Drake plays against the Oklahoma A&M starting defense, prior to the October 20 game.[2] Spiegel also recounted the experiences of a businessman and his wife, who were seated behind a group of Oklahoma A&M practice squad players. At the beginning of the game, one of the players turned around said, "We're gonna get that nigger."[2] After the first blow to Bright was delivered by Smith, the same player again turned around and told the businessman, "See that knot on my jaw? That same guy [Smith] gave me that the very same way in practice."[2]

Drake University and fellow Missouri Valley Conference member Bradley University withdrew from the Conference in protest for several years, not only in response to the Bright incident, but also because both Oklahoma A&M and the Conference refused to take any disciplinary action against Wilbanks Smith.[4] The "Johnny Bright Incident", as it became widely known, eventually provoked changes in NCAA football rules regarding illegal blocking, and mandated the use of more protective helmets with face guards.[2]

Recalling the incident without apparent bitterness in a 1980 Des Moines Register interview three years before his death, Bright commented: "There's no way it couldn't have been racially motivated." Bright went on to add: "What I like about the whole deal now, and what I'm smug enough to say, is that getting a broken jaw has somehow made college athletics better. It made the NCAA take a hard look and clean up some things that were bad."[2]

---------------------------------------------

Dick Rowland (born c. 1902) was an African-American teen-age shoeshiner whose false arrest in May 1921 was the impetus for the Tulsa Race Riot. When he was arrested for attempted assault, Rowland was 19 years old. The white teen-ager, who was supposed to have been the victim, declined to prosecute. The arrest was prompted after Rowland tripped in an elevator on his way to a segregated bathroom, and a white store clerk misconstrued the incident as an "assault."

Rowland's birth name was Jimmie Jones. [1] It is not known where he was born, but by 1908 he and two sisters were orphans living in Vinita, Oklahoma. Jones was informally adopted by Damie Ford, an African-American woman. In approximately 1909 Ford and Jones moved to Tulsa, Oklahoma to join Ford's family, the Rowlands. Eventually, Jones took Rowland as his last name, and selected his favorite first name, Dick, as his own. Rowland attended the city's segregated schools, including Booker T. Washington High School.[2]

He dropped out of high school to take a job shining shoes in a white-owned and white-patronized shine parlor on Main Street in downtown Tulsa. As Tulsa was a segregated city where Jim Crow practices were in effect, black people were not allowed to use toilet facilities used by white people. There was no separate facility for blacks at the shine parlor where Rowland worked and the owner had arranged for Black employees to use a segregated "Colored" restroom on the top floor of the nearby Drexel Building at 319 S. Main Street.

On May 30, 1921, Rowland attempted to enter the Drexel building elevator and, although the exact facts are either unknown or in dispute, according to the most accepted accounts, he tripped, and while falling, latched on to the arm of the elevator operator, Sarah Page, then 17 years old. Startled, the elevator operator screamed and a white clerk in a first floor store called police to report seeing Rowland flee from the elevator and the building. The white clerk on the first floor reported the incident as an attempted assault.

Rowlands was arrested the following day, on May 31, 1921. Subsequent actions by white citizens in an apparent attempt to lynch him, and by black citizens to protect him, sparked a riot that lasted 16 hours and caused the destruction by fire of 35 city blocks and 1,256 residences in Tulsa's prosperous African-American neighborhood of Greenwood, and over 800 injuries and the deaths of at about 300 blacks and 13 whites.[3]

The case against Dick Rowland was dismissed at the end of September, 1921. The dismissal followed the receipt of a letter by the County Attorney from Sarah Page in which she stated that she did not wish to prosecute the case.

According to Damie Ford, once Rowland was exonerated he immediately left Tulsa, and went to Kansas City.[4] Little else is publicly known about the remainder of Rowland's life.Dick Rowland (born c. 1902) was an African-American teen-age shoeshiner whose false arrest in May 1921 was the impetus for the Tulsa Race Riot. When he was arrested for attempted assault, Rowland was 19 years old. The white teen-ager, who was supposed to have been the victim, declined to prosecute. The arrest was prompted after Rowland tripped in an elevator on his way to a segregated bathroom, and a white store clerk misconstrued the incident as an "assault."

Rowland's birth name was Jimmie Jones. [1] It is not known where he was born, but by 1908 he and two sisters were orphans living in Vinita, Oklahoma. Jones was informally adopted by Damie Ford, an African-American woman. In approximately 1909 Ford and Jones moved to Tulsa, Oklahoma to join Ford's family, the Rowlands. Eventually, Jones took Rowland as his last name, and selected his favorite first name, Dick, as his own. Rowland attended the city's segregated schools, including Booker T. Washington High School.[2]

He dropped out of high school to take a job shining shoes in a white-owned and white-patronized shine parlor on Main Street in downtown Tulsa. As Tulsa was a segregated city where Jim Crow practices were in effect, black people were not allowed to use toilet facilities used by white people. There was no separate facility for blacks at the shine parlor where Rowland worked and the owner had arranged for Black employees to use a segregated "Colored" restroom on the top floor of the nearby Drexel Building at 319 S. Main Street.

On May 30, 1921, Rowland attempted to enter the Drexel building elevator and, although the exact facts are either unknown or in dispute, according to the most accepted accounts, he tripped, and while falling, latched on to the arm of the elevator operator, Sarah Page, then 17 years old. Startled, the elevator operator screamed and a white clerk in a first floor store called police to report seeing Rowland flee from the elevator and the building. The white clerk on the first floor reported the incident as an attempted assault.

Rowlands was arrested the following day, on May 31, 1921. Subsequent actions by white citizens in an apparent attempt to lynch him, and by black citizens to protect him, sparked a riot that lasted 16 hours and caused the destruction by fire of 35 city blocks and 1,256 residences in Tulsa's prosperous African-American neighborhood of Greenwood, and over 800 injuries and the deaths of at about 300 blacks and 13 whites.[3]

The case against Dick Rowland was dismissed at the end of September, 1921. The dismissal followed the receipt of a letter by the County Attorney from Sarah Page in which she stated that she did not wish to prosecute the case.

According to Damie Ford, once Rowland was exonerated he immediately left Tulsa, and went to Kansas City.[4] Little else is publicly known about the remainder of Rowland's life.

(to be continued...)
 
Back
Top