More proof that you are not the Navy Chief you once were, Terry. The answer is in the OP:
Okay. I'll go through them.
OP List:
1. CNN took Trump's statement out of context. Not a lie, they even admit it in their second sentence on inflation rates.
2. Reductio ad absurdum fallacy on missile launches and N. Korea. They take Trump's statement that is a generalization and find minor exceptions. Again, not a lie on Trump's part.
3. Another Reductio ad absurdum fallacy regarding ISIS. Trump may exaggerate the effectiveness and timeline of his actions against ISIS but, even CNN admits they were eventually defeated. Not a lie.
4. On Trump's classified documents case. CNN admits Trump's statements aren't completely accurate, but obliquely says they aren't lies either.
I could go through the rest, but it's all the same thing. Exaggeration, hyperbole, generalizations, and platitudes, among other typical political rhetoric are all parsed through by CNN with a fine-tooth comb and then characterized as "lies" rather than what they are.
All in all, what CNN does is a form of strawman argument by quoting without context and using a series of reductio ad absurdum fallacies. That is, they parse Trump's speech, find a statement that isn't 100% accurate and then proclaim it is a lie. It's all just a bullshit attempt to attack and smear someone CNN's reporters outright hate. That lack of objectivity and any attempt to fairly report makes their claims worthless.