More Cadmium Jewellery

Thorn

Member
It's not just for children -- or for discount stores. Cadmium has been found at high levels in adult jewellery, and at some very respectable outlets:

Cadmium found in adult jewelry; 1 store pulls item
By JUSTIN PRITCHARD, Associated Press Writer Justin Pritchard, Associated Press Writer
Tue Feb 2, 6:49 pm ET

LOS ANGELES – Concern about the heavy metal cadmium in jewelry grew Tuesday as a California environmental group said new testing of adult necklaces and bracelets bought at three leading retailers, including Saks Fifth Avenue and Aeropostale, detected high levels of the toxic material — as much as 75 percent by weight.

One of the pieces was made in China and another was made in India. Labeling on a black-colored link necklace, purchased at Saks for $69.99, did not indicate where it was made.

Based on the results of its testing, the Center for Environmental Health said it would seek a ban on cadmium in all jewelry.

The center said it began lab testing adult jewelry for cadmium after an Associated Press investigation reported last month that pieces of cheap children's jewelry imported from China contained levels of cadmium of up to 91 percent of their total content.

In response to an AP inquiry about the adult jewelry findings, the parent company of Catherines, a national chain of plus-size stores, said Tuesday that it was pulling a bracelet with a pink "breast cancer awareness" charm that was found to have high levels of cadmium from all 460 of its stories. The item, made in China, was bought for $6.99.

Saks Inc. spokeswoman Julia Bentley said only: "We received a letter from the CEH today and are reviewing and evaluating this matter."

Aeropostale did not respond to requests for comment after tests showed that a circular pendant on a necklace bought at the retailer for $7.99 also revealed a relatively high level of cadmium, according to the center. The piece was made in India.

The Center for Environmental Health said it was pursuing a lawsuit under a California law it used to set stringent limits on lead in both adult and children's jewelry in the state, starting in 2006. The settlement of that lawsuit was pivotal in national efforts to reduce lead levels in all metal jewelry sold in the United States.

There is no limit under federal law on cadmium in jewelry sold in the U.S.

In the latest testing, besides the three adult jewelry pieces, a $7.90 cupcake-shaped pendant on a necklace bought at the 'tween store Justice also had a high level of cadmium, the center said.

"Our legal action sends a strong signal to industry that we will not stand by while they play toxic flavor of the month with jewelry," said Michael Green, the group's executive director.

"Cadmium is toxic at any age. There is no excuse for cadmium in any jewelry, and we intend to eliminate this health threat to women and children," he said.

The center's testing had revealed cadmium in adult jewelry dating to at least September 2008, but its focus had been on lead until the AP investigation.

Gayle M. Coolick, a vice president for Charming Shoppes, Inc., of Bensalem, Pa., said it was pulling the breast cancer awareness charm and bracelet from all its Catherines stores, not just those in California.

"As Charming Shoppes and its subsidiaries do not market or sell children's items, and as the (Consumer Product Safety Commission) has warned against the use of cadmium in children's products, Charming Shoppes has not tested for this metal for its products marketed and sold to adults," she said. "It is Charming Shoppes' intent to follow all state and federal requirements with regard to product safety."

In its analysis, the Center for Environmental Health did an initial screening of 97 jewelry items with a technology called XRF, which uses X-rays to estimate how much of a metal is in an item. Alarmingly high levels of cadmium were detected in seven pieces.

Four of these were sent to a Chicago-based lab, Stat Analysis, for detailed analysis, with the other three planned for later analysis, according to center spokesman Charles Margulis.

Cadmium is used primarily in rechargeable nickel-cadmium batteries, as well as in pigments, electroplating and plastic.

Cadmium is a known carcinogen, particularly when it is inhaled in a factory or other workplace. It also can cause serious problems with kidneys and bones, diseases that typically are caused by cadmium that has been ingested in contaminated food or tobacco. The exact risks to adults aren't clear because typically the metal takes long-term exposure to cause the diseases.

Children's jewelry has been of particular concern because kids bite and suck on jewelry — something far less common among adults. Microscopic amounts of cadmium also could be shed onto the hands, and then ingested either by eating or putting a contaminated finger to the mouth.

A spokesman for the Fashion Jewelry Trade Association said the group did not have access to the Center for Environmental Health data, so it could not comment in detail. Executive director Michael Gale did say that the group remains "confident in the safety of our members' jewelry products." He added, "Based on available data, cadmium in jewelry does not pose health risks to adults or children."

The California environmental group sent notices late Monday to the four retailers that it intends to sue based on its lab test results; under California law, no lawsuit can be filed for 60 days, during which time state or local prosecutors can decide to take over the case.

The four companies are now parties to what is often called the Burlington settlement — an agreement based on a Center for Environmental Health lawsuit under which major national retailers agreed to reduce levels of lead in jewelry. That settlement was significant because it included the first widely observed limits for lead on adult items.

Under California legislation passed in 2006, the upper limit for lead in adult jewelry is far higher than what is allowed for children's jewelry because the health concerns were not as pronounced.

Within hours of AP's Jan. 10 report on high levels of cadmium in children's jewelry, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission launched an investigation.

The next day, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. announced it was pulling three of the contaminated items from store shelves. The Consumer Product Safety Commission has since advised parents to throw away all cheap children's metal jewelry and federal lawmakers have proposed legislation to ban cadmium in children's jewelry. Last week, the Consumer Product Safety Commission announced a recall of two of the items sold at Walmart stores.

--------------------------------------------------------------

I have a contact allergy to metal other than gold, so this particular matter is moot for me personally, but I can't help but wonder what else is out there that hasn't been tested or discovered yet.
 
Last edited:
Officials in the Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) will find out whether the accused products came out of China through legal means.

Without solid facts and detailed information, we are unable to comment.

Three officials responsible for cadmium pollution that sickened 509 people in Liuyang City were punished in August.

However, primary investigation indicates neither China nor USA have specific regulations on cadmium limits in consumer goods.
 
When are people going to realize that China is deliberately poisoning us and stop buying their rubbish?
 
Officials in the Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) will find out whether the accused products came out of China through legal means.

Without solid facts and detailed information, we are unable to comment.

Three officials responsible for cadmium pollution that sickened 509 people in Liuyang City were punished in August.

However, primary investigation indicates neither China nor USA have specific regulations on cadmium limits in consumer goods.

So, you actually speak for the government???
 
Considering how dirt cheap these products are coming in from China and the margins at which they're solid, there would be a long-term incentive to at least bring on a private regulator who would scan these products for toxic materials before they ship.

Do we have something like a UL for products originating from Asia? Build it into the contracts with these manufacturers that they have to submit to inspection.
 
I drive a Hyundai and I think they make a great car, especially compared to what they were once known for. The value and reliability is high.

And, when my car was in the shop time after last due to someone smashing into it (L.A. drivers), Enterprise gave me a Kia Spectra, which is essentially the exact same body and model as the Elantra I drive with fewer features. Had no complaints. If anything, as the years have gone by (since my car's an 03) they've done more to soup up their brand and the quality of their product.

Also, while the one I drive was made in Korea, there are a number of them being made in the U.S. now. They have a plant in Alabama and a design facility here in Southern California.

...I am not paid by Hyundai or Kia to say any of this, was just happy with the car and wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.
 
I drive a Hyundai and I think they make a great car, especially compared to what they were once known for. The value and reliability is high.

And, when my car was in the shop time after last due to someone smashing into it (L.A. drivers), Enterprise gave me a Kia Spectra, which is essentially the exact same body and model as the Elantra I drive with fewer features. Had no complaints. If anything, as the years have gone by (since my car's an 03) they've done more to soup up their brand and the quality of their product.

Also, while the one I drive was made in Korea, there are a number of them being made in the U.S. now. They have a plant in Alabama and a design facility here in Southern California.

...I am not paid by Hyundai or Kia to say any of this, was just happy with the car and wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.

Had to drive a Hyundai for a few days. For that few days it was a great car. Don't know about the long term though. Can't drive a car now anyway. Have to have a truck.
 
I drive a Hyundai and I think they make a great car, especially compared to what they were once known for. The value and reliability is high.

And, when my car was in the shop time after last due to someone smashing into it (L.A. drivers), Enterprise gave me a Kia Spectra, which is essentially the exact same body and model as the Elantra I drive with fewer features. Had no complaints. If anything, as the years have gone by (since my car's an 03) they've done more to soup up their brand and the quality of their product.

Also, while the one I drive was made in Korea, there are a number of them being made in the U.S. now. They have a plant in Alabama and a design facility here in Southern California.

...I am not paid by Hyundai or Kia to say any of this, was just happy with the car and wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.

This Kia I have was making 2900 rpm on the highway at 70 mph, and the engine noise was horrendous. I'll know better when I put gas it it, but I expect its only getting 10 mpg. That's based on the gauge going from 1/8 to 1/8 on my 15 mile trip, and what I assume is at least a 12 gallon tank.
 
Had to drive a Hyundai for a few days. For that few days it was a great car. Don't know about the long term though. Can't drive a car now anyway. Have to have a truck.
My wife drives a Hyundai, they make a very reliable car. The Kia is owned by the same company, they were forced by the Korean government to "purchase" and run Kia when Kia went into bankruptcy.

Basically KIA has become the lower end version of Hyundai.
 
Re: the jewellery -- some of it, according to the article, was made in India too.

Toyota was a superb brand for many years. The recent problems have occurred on vehicles made here in the U.S. I don't know if this was a design flaw (which might then be attributed to Japanese design) or something that occurred here. I just wish that as much thought about the driver's needs had gone into my '05 Jeep as did with my old Corolla.
 
This Kia I have was making 2900 rpm on the highway at 70 mph, and the engine noise was horrendous. I'll know better when I put gas it it, but I expect its only getting 10 mpg. That's based on the gauge going from 1/8 to 1/8 on my 15 mile trip, and what I assume is at least a 12 gallon tank.

Maybe I'm not familiar enough with engines, but 2900 going at 70 without cruise control seems about normal in my experience for a V4, depending on how you apply the gas.

Are you used to a V6 or a V8?

Their sedans are decent on mileage, but the luxury and SUVs they make I woudn't say are designed with the fuel efficiency in mind. But when you consider the price difference to a comparable model, you can't justify spending a lot more for a little more mileage.
 
Maybe I'm not familiar enough with engines, but 2900 going at 70 without cruise control seems about normal in my experience for a V4, depending on how you apply the gas.

Are you used to a V6 or a V8?

Their sedans are decent on mileage, but the luxury and SUVs they make I woudn't say are designed with the fuel efficiency in mind. But when you consider the price difference to a comparable model, you can't justify spending a lot more for a little more mileage.

You may be right and yes I'm much more accustomed to larger engines, but back in the 80's I had a Ford Escort and I don't recall the thing revving that high; it certainly didn't make all that noise and vibration. And I drove that fucker hard for several years; either all the way on the gas or all the way on the brake.

By the way a V4 engine is not a typical econo-box configuration. Although my car days are long over I suspect these are only used for high performance applications where small size is paramount, such as on motorcycles and outboard engines. Cheapo cars like the Kia probably are in-line 4's, or maybe even an in line 3 cylinder.
 
Re: the jewellery -- some of it, according to the article, was made in India too.

Toyota was a superb brand for many years. The recent problems have occurred on vehicles made here in the U.S. I don't know if this was a design flaw (which might then be attributed to Japanese design) or something that occurred here. I just wish that as much thought about the driver's needs had gone into my '05 Jeep as did with my old Corolla.
The stuff made in India was probably from a Chinese company, outsourcing.
 
Back
Top