House GOP to present evidence against Biden in first impeachment hearing

ExpressLane said:
House GOP to present evidence against Biden in first impeachment hearing
First hearing out of impeachment inquiry against Biden begins Thursday at 10 am

House Republicans on Thursday morning are set to hold their first impeachment inquiry public hearing, where they will present all evidence uncovered to date as part of their investigation into the Biden family’s business dealings while examining "the value" of the inquiry.


The House Oversight Committee, led by Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., will "examine the value of an impeachment inquiry and present evidence House Republicans have uncovered to date regarding President Joe Biden's knowledge of and role in his family's domestic and international business practices," according to the panel. The hearing is to begin at 10 a.m.

Bruce Dubinsky, a forensic accountant with decades of experience in financial investigations and consulting – and who the committee says has testified in more than 80 trials, including trials that involved financial fraud – will testify, along with former Assistant Attorney General Eileen O'Connor, who served in the Department of Justice Tax Division.

Law professor and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley, who testified in the Clinton and Trump impeachments, will also testify.

The House Oversight and Accountability Committee has uncovered a mountain of evidence revealing how Joe Biden abused his public office for his family’s financial gain," Comer is expected to say in his opening statement. "For years, President Biden has lied to the American people about his knowledge of and participation in his family’s corrupt business schemes."

"Evidence reveals that then-Vice President Joe Biden spoke, dined, and developed relationships with his family’s foreign business targets. These business targets include foreign oligarchs who sent millions of dollars to his family," Comer is expected to say. "It also includes a Chinese national who wired a quarter of a million dollars to his son."

Comer was referring to subpoenaed Hunter Biden financial records, which revealed he received two wires originating from Beijing and linked to BHR Partners in 2019.
Fox News Digital first reported that Hunter Biden received the wire payments, which originated in Beijing, for more than $250,000 from Chinese business partners during the summer of 2019 — wires that listed the Delaware home of Joe Biden as the beneficiary address for the funds.

The White House declined to comment.

"To date, the House Oversight Committee has uncovered how the Bidens and their associates created over 20 shell companies and raked in over $24 million dollars," Comer will say, adding that the committee has also "identified nine members of the Biden family who have participated in or benefited from these business schemes."

"What were the Bidens selling to make all this money? Joe Biden himself," Comer will say. "The American people demand accountability for this culture of corruption." .....This should


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ho...esent-evidence-against-biden-in-first-hearing
================================
This is must see TV set your DVR . I have been asking liberals for months now what Service or Products are the Biden family selling that is worth 10s of millions of dollars. I know democrats will say there is no evidence. Criminals tend to try to hide their crimes. Slow Joe Bribem isn't very smart but he is or was smart enough to try to hide his bribery. But like most criminals he has lived beyond his means. Hunter said in a text the Biden family has only one asset. We all know who that one asset is. That one asset sprung into action with quid pro quo for Mykola Zlochevsky to save Burisma from investigation by Shokin. To the liberals here that parrot "there is no evidence" you need to watch this investigation today. We convict people for murder so we can impeach Joke Bribem for bribery with circumstantial evidence if need be. Remember the Politician does not directly have to benefit from selling his power his family can benefit and it is still bribery. We all know the Biden family has benefited from their one asset. :
Click to expand...

It is already a joke, who’s Comer’s legal expert, Fox’s Turley, couldn’t get any funnier, and now the freedom idiots can’t get by the question why the entire House wasn’t allowed to vote on starting the inquiry. Only network showing it is Fox, and they’re editing out Democrat’s questions, substituting “regular contributors” opinions instead, as I said, a joke

And what makes it even a bigger charade is that MaraLago has already ordered them that the Biden has to be impeached, so all this regurgitation of debunked “evidence” is for show, the Committee is going to vote to impeach regardless
 
domer76 said:
“could have”

LOL
Click to expand...

Innuendo and implication replace evidence and fact. Trumpys are well-trained to believe whatever apocryphal stories are thrown their way. They are Pavlovian in their reactions. The righty "leaders" are ringing the bell and the response is predetermined and guaranteed.
Note this is supposed to be an inquiry. That shows all those claims about Biden have no proof. They have stated that Biden is a crook and taking bribes. They have done it for years with a scintilla of evidence. Now they are looking for it again.
 
ExpressLane said:
All the Democrats have is Hunter was just selling an "illusion" of Joe Biden's power.
Click to expand...
FALSE.

That is all the republi'cans' have and THEY ADMIT THAT. The 'it looks bad'... ' We sure hope one day we will have proof', that we hear from the investigation heads Comer and Jim Jordan, and all the Republi'cans' who they were trying to whip to get an Impeachment investigation vote but who said 'We need to see a single fact connecting Joe but have NOT yet'.




Burisma wanting Biden's help stopping their investigation
Click to expand...
FACTUALLY WRONG.

There was NO Burisma investigation happening at that time because the corrupt prosecutor was blocking that and most other corruption investigations.


and Joe Biden getting the investigation of Burisma stopped is a pretty strong "illusion". :palm:
Click to expand...
FACTUALLY WRONG.

Joe, acting on US policy, as guided by the US Republican lead House Committee, that called for the corrupt Ukraine prosecutor to be removed, and based on the EU, IMF and UN also all calling for the corrupt prosecutor to be removed, was the biggest threat to Burisma. removing the corrupt prosecutor in the hopes Ukraine would replace him with a better one, was what all the groups (UN, EU, IMF, House Committee) wanted.
 
ExpressLane said:
The IRS and DOJ forbade the IRS whistleblowers from including Joe Biden in their investigation.

“There were certain investigative steps we weren’t allowed to take that could have led us to President Biden,” Shapley told CBS reporter Jim Axelrod.
Click to expand...

Yes and when questioned in the House, where they cannot lie without consequences, every timeline they claimed obstruction was during the Trump term and his DoJ and IRS.

So why was Trump blocking them looking into Hunter?


ExpressLane said:
Yes could have if justice had not been obstructed.
Click to expand...

you forgot the ending to that sentence which is '...by Trump, his DoJ and his IRS...'
 
Any articles of impeachment will be defeated on a bipartisan basis. There is no evidence, and are there aren't anywhere near enough votes. But it was cute watching the GOP focusing on a bogus impeachment less than three days from a government shutdown. Did you think people wouldn't notice or what?
 
domer76 said:
Thomas and wife, Ginny, cashed in all the time on position. Where are the righties on that?
Click to expand...

The difference is there is FACT and abundant EVIDENCE of Clarence Thomas and Ginny grifting and gaining massive financial benefit in defiance of the law, just as there is with Trump, Jared and Ivanka doing the same during his presidency.


Trump tards have no interest, where there are actual facts and evidence.
 
So, I was kidding when I said they would prevent evidence that there was no evidence. Turns out that's EXACTLY what happened, one of their witnesses said there was not enough evidence to support impeachment. This is just so utterly embarrassing and stupid, and yet the cult will continue to cling to it. How sad;
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top