Candace Owens Hero Or Villain Poll

Candace Owens: Hero or Villain?

  • Total voters
    10
She is self made, largely self taught, ballsy, and right a high percentage of the time. I think that she does not get the respect she has earned because folks cant get past the self made self taught part...they assume she must be a pawn a greater powers.
 
Guno צְבִי;5947663 said:
Candace Owens: ‘If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well — OK, fine’

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...hitler-just-wanted-to-make-germany-great-and/

Candace Owens bizarrely claims Hitler went wrong only when he meddled in other countries. Hitler’s murderous crimes against Jews & others were horrific regardless of whether they occurred across Europe or in Germany alone.
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, she is also correct. If Hitler had completely eradicated Jews and other "undesirables" from Germany alone, nobody would have done much more than handwringing. That's the terrible truth of it.

Don't buy that? Well, nobody stopped Stalin from wiping out whole swaths of people in the Soviet Union, and sending tens, even hundreds of thousands to labor camps. Mao, topped that, slaughtering tens of millions with no repercussions. Pol Pot? The genocide in Rwanda more recently. Don't see the perps of that being hauled to prison.

Hitler on the other hand, invaded all his neighbors, started a world war, and then lost. He was ass fucked from the moment he stopped winning and that was in early 1940. He pissed too many other nations and heads of state off. Whacking your own people is one thing, whacking everybody else's is another... Shitty world we live in hum?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Unfortunately, she is also correct. If Hitler had completely eradicated Jews and other "undesirables" from Germany alone, nobody would have done much more than handwringing. That's the terrible truth of it.

Don't buy that? Well, nobody stopped Stalin from wiping out whole swaths of people in the Soviet Union, and sending tens, even hundreds of thousands to labor camps. Mao, topped that, slaughtering tens of millions with no repercussions. Pol Pot? The genocide in Rwanda more recently. Don't see the perps of that being hauled to prison.

Hitler on the other hand, invaded all his neighbors, started a world war, and then lost. He was ass fucked from the moment he stopped winning and that was in early 1940. He pissed too many other nations and heads of state off. Whacking your own people is one thing, whacking everybody else's is another... Shitty world we live in hum?
Click to expand...

Unfortunately, she is also correct.If Hitler had completely eradicated Jews and other "undesirables" from Germany
Click to expand...

You said everything we need to know about you
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Unfortunately, she is also correct. If Hitler had completely eradicated Jews and other "undesirables" from Germany alone, nobody would have done much more than handwringing. That's the terrible truth of it.

Don't buy that? Well, nobody stopped Stalin from wiping out whole swaths of people in the Soviet Union, and sending tens, even hundreds of thousands to labor camps. Mao, topped that, slaughtering tens of millions with no repercussions. Pol Pot? The genocide in Rwanda more recently. Don't see the perps of that being hauled to prison.

Hitler on the other hand, invaded all his neighbors, started a world war, and then lost. He was ass fucked from the moment he stopped winning and that was in early 1940. He pissed too many other nations and heads of state off. Whacking your own people is one thing, whacking everybody else's is another... Shitty world we live in hum?
Click to expand...

You don't sound like you're giving Hitler a ringing endorsement, which is as it should be.
 
Guno צְבִי;5947663 said:
Candace Owens: ‘If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well — OK, fine’

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...hitler-just-wanted-to-make-germany-great-and/

Candace Owens bizarrely claims Hitler went wrong only when he meddled in other countries. Hitler’s murderous crimes against Jews & others were horrific regardless of whether they occurred across Europe or in Germany alone.
Click to expand...

Perhaps she wasn't aware of all the damage that he did -within- Germany.
 
Guno צְבִי;5947788 said:
T. A. Gardner said:
Unfortunately, she is also correct. If Hitler had completely eradicated Jews and other "undesirables" from Germany alone, nobody would have done much more than handwringing. That's the terrible truth of it.

Don't buy that? Well, nobody stopped Stalin from wiping out whole swaths of people in the Soviet Union, and sending tens, even hundreds of thousands to labor camps. Mao, topped that, slaughtering tens of millions with no repercussions. Pol Pot? The genocide in Rwanda more recently. Don't see the perps of that being hauled to prison.

Hitler on the other hand, invaded all his neighbors, started a world war, and then lost. He was ass fucked from the moment he stopped winning and that was in early 1940. He pissed too many other nations and heads of state off. Whacking your own people is one thing, whacking everybody else's is another... Shitty world we live in hum?
Click to expand...

You said everything we need to know about you
Click to expand...

You're so critical of TAG in regards to Hitler, but so laisser faire when it comes to wanton slaughter Israel is currently engaging in. Do you really see -no- hypocracy in these 2 stances of yours?
 
Phoenyx said:
Perhaps she wasn't aware of all the damage that he did -within- Germany.
Click to expand...

plus that sentence started with IF.

it's literally true, if all Hitler did was make trains run on time it would have been fine.

a true statement.



did you watch the Candace and rabbi Barclay video?

 
T. A. Gardner said:
Unfortunately, she is also correct. If Hitler had completely eradicated Jews and other "undesirables" from Germany alone, nobody would have done much more than handwringing. That's the terrible truth of it.

Don't buy that? Well, nobody stopped Stalin from wiping out whole swaths of people in the Soviet Union, and sending tens, even hundreds of thousands to labor camps. Mao, topped that, slaughtering tens of millions with no repercussions. Pol Pot? The genocide in Rwanda more recently. Don't see the perps of that being hauled to prison.

Hitler on the other hand, invaded all his neighbors, started a world war, and then lost. He was ass fucked from the moment he stopped winning and that was in early 1940. He pissed too many other nations and heads of state off. Whacking your own people is one thing, whacking everybody else's is another... Shitty world we live in hum?
Click to expand...

yes. he did forever wars and nationbuilding just like our neocons trying to destroy our nation.

and Hitler was fully backed by the Bank of International Settlements and select western collaborators including the bush family.

maybe trying to take over the world is just always a bad idea.
 
Last edited:
She is right about Hitler...nobody would have done anything about Hitler if the Germans were not cot consuming other nations....the world would have said "OK".
 
Guno צְבִי;5947788 said:
You said everything we need to know about you
Click to expand...

TAG said most of everything you need to know about National Socialists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top