That has nothing to do with my argument you tard.
No, my argument is that an actual crime has to be committed. Actual harm has to have occurred. You can't charge someone for a "Thought crime." What the court did was extract a penalty for any future occasion where Trump might turn in iffy documents. That is, the court couldn't find him libel for the actual cases the state brought so they found him libel for any potential future cases that might be brought.
That is the very essence of a "Thought crime." The court became mind readers. The judge decided on the basis of his own opinion, and nothing more, that in the future Trump MIGHT, POSSIBLY, could repeat his behavior so on that basis he threw a half-a-billion dollar judgement against him. It wasn't on the basis of anything that has already occurred but rather on the basis of the judge using psychic powers, fortune telling, or some other equally stupid means of telling the future. That's the problem.