Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
See? You label the living but not the dead. Why?collateral damage is not a political classification, much like you statists tend to gravitate to in the face of anything.
See? You label the living but not the dead. Why?collateral damage is not a political classification, much like you statists tend to gravitate to in the face of anything.
Learn what 'fact' means, Sock.
Ignoring history won't work.
You can't handle the truth !
Lies and hallucinations are not 'truth', Sock. You are just describing yourself again.
y'all should be thankful it wasn't a serious attempt. Imagine what would have happened had half of them been seriously armed.
The same results with a lot more deaths. They would have been shooting each other and destroying the capital even more. I am sure that would please you.
ROFL, it never ceases to amaze me, the level of cognitive dissonance you partisan idiots employ just to get through an hour a day of your pitiful life.
The same results with a lot more deaths. They would have been shooting each other and destroying the capital even more. I am sure that would please you.
Why do you believe the militias won't attack again, this time armed as you suggested?
^^^why do you continue to make assumptions of shit without evidence? As for not believing the next attack coming, it's because I've not heard anything about it......yet. So far, the outlook of trump winning the election is keeping them at bay.
^^^
A sign of deceit and paranoia is to avoid answering questions but expecting others to answer their loaded questions.
1/6 is not an assumption, Sgt. Doolittle. Several militia were armed at the Insurrection and charged accordingly. Before 1/6, you made threats to murder Federal agents infiltrating your militia. After 1/6 you dropped your claims of being a Threeper and, like now, deny the militias pose a threat.
Why do you believe the militias won't attack again, this time armed as you suggested?
How does DumberThanShit know half of them weren't armed?
You are describing yourself again, Sock. You cannot project YOUR problems on anybody else.A sign of deceit and paranoia is to avoid answering questions but expecting others to answer their loaded questions.
Correct. It's a date.1/6 is not an assumption, Sgt. Doolittle.
It's legal to carry a gun, Sock.Several militia were armed at the Insurrection and charged accordingly.
He's not a Democrat, Sock.Before 1/6, you made threats to murder Federal agents infiltrating your militia.
Democrat militias ARE a threat. Burning, looting, vandalism, and pillaging are crimes, Sock.After 1/6 you dropped your claims of being a Threeper and, like now, deny the militias pose a threat.
you cannot take 4 chapters from separate books and expect to make a story that makes sense. this is what you're doing right here.
yes, several people were armed. that's how many out of how many? 2%, MAYBE???? I also said 'seriously' armed. you didnt see dozens with rifles, you say a few handguns.
the rest of your rant is both irrelevant and petty, being used to make you feel like you're making a point, but there isn't one connected with the OP or with anything I said in this thread.
Take your medicine, Sybil. You'll feel better.![]()
^^^No medicine will cure your condition, Sock.
Why do you believe the militias won't attack again, this time armed as you suggested?