CNN: Judge rules Fanny stays on the case!

[Concart]

He’s Corrupt exclamation exclamation exclamation

Observing decisions handed down by judges who have come from a variety of different backgrounds is interesting. What I've seen of McAfee would not have led me to any conclusion regarding his background because he seems to be a thoughtful and articulate judge and he is very careful in any public pronunciations that he is making. I have less experience with this than you do, but most judges, regardless of their background, appear to me to be fair and impartial. There are exceptions (Cannon *cough*) but they really are exceptions. When a political trial like this comes up, the judge is going to be closely scrutinized. I feel bad for him, because you KNOW the death threats are coming, and he has three small kids. Sad.

 

[archives]

Professionally and personally "Fanny's" got no credibility left... this was a great decision on the judge's part... this is just getting good...

None of it has anything to do with Trump’s case, well, other than Fox echoing that she is out for revenge and Trump is the martyr, otherwise, she, and the case, will proceed as planned

 

[QP!]

Professionally and personally "Fanny's" got no credibility left... this was a great decision on the judge's part... this is just getting good...

yes she may get an HR scolding from some groups, and even her electorate may votre her out next election BUT the case will continue as it should and always was going to, despite you prior idiocy in saying with surety it would not.

This is the proper ruling.

Basic HR issues do matter but they are certainly NOT something that would EVER get a prosecutor dismissed, and anyone, not an idiot understood that.

 

[Concart]

Still don’t understand why the DA being caught fooling around, even considering some suspicious financial arrangements, had anything to do with the case of Trump being prosecuted for fraudulently trying to change the election in Georgia. How does any of this weigh against him receiving a fair trial? How does it even effect him or his trial?

I think the question before the court isn't a question of 'fair trial', but the question of the conduct of the parties, and whether the charges were brought for personal gain. I agree with the decision of the judge. I actually think Willis should have stepped aside and assigned this to someone else in the office, but at this point, other than grist for the Trump cult mill, this issue is put to bed. My two cents. It was a distraction because of the high profile nature of this case, but motions to dismiss are very common in probably every trial. Any lawyer worth their salt makes sure they get anything and everything on the record in anticipation that a defendant will appeal.

 

[anonymoose]

Not that it has anything to do with the thread, but why? You know you are going to get the predictable replies which will quickly evolve into the personal crapola

My position actually has little do with gun control. It’s a unique concept

 

[signalmankenneth]

How many of you were Trumpped?



Every single time you get Trumpped.


Another corrupt Judge? Hahahahahahahahaha!


Cnn.com

That's great news, now she needs to correctly refile those charges the judge through out on Trump and others?!! I hope she can find another lead prosecutor for the case who is not scared of Trump's base?!!

 

[anonymoose]

Professionally and personally "Fanny's" got no credibility left... this was a great decision on the judge's part... this is just getting good...

I thought he was in a no win position. But now I see his decision was the obvious one.

 

[anonymoose]

He’s Corrupt exclamation exclamation exclamation

The judge is denying Wade from getting his feet wet in prosecuting his first felony case.

 

[volsrock]

Since this judge has now finally ruled, Trumps team can Appeal his ruling. Had this judge never agreed to hearing the case, then there would be no appeal until a verdict, but now it is fair game to be seen my a federal judge.

Thus this is NOT over.

 

[anonymoose]

Still don’t understand why the DA being caught fooling around, even considering some suspicious financial arrangements, had anything to do with the case of Trump being prosecuted for fraudulently trying to change the election in Georgia. How does any of this weigh against him receiving a fair trial? How does it even affect him or his trial?

This could be the argument by the defense: Fani had the opportunity to pay lots of money to her lover who could easily share that with her if she prosecuted a fuzzy case.

 

[Althea]

The judge said the prosecution can’t proceed unless he withdraws or she steps aside.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/0...-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb


That was a pretty good trick by the judge in a no win situation for him.

Which makes sense. We didn't need to stall a trial for a month to arrive here.

Which is the only reason for this nonsense.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

How many of you were Trumpped?



Every single time you get Trumpped.


Another corrupt Judge? Hahahahahahahahaha!


Cnn.com

I thought I heard the delicious sound of MAGAT heads exploding in rage. Cue the racist comments in 4... 3... 2... 1... !

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Despite what idiots like TOP and others stated as a certainty, that the Judge would end the trial and exclude her, it was truly never in doubt amongst smarter people.

Top legal officials on the left and right almost all argued the threshold of removal 'actual conflict' not only has not been argued by those lawyers pushing it, but does not appear.

That something 'looks bad' in an HR type way, is NOT ENOUGH.

But Magats live off of 'looks bad' now as what they think should be enough when going after Dems, because that is typically the ONLY THING they can find, as all their prosecutions FAIL due to lack of FACTS or EVIDENCE and PROOF.


At no point was there ANYTHING even offered that got close to reaching the threshold of 'actual conflict' and that is why magats lost this.

Well said, thanks. The whole poutrage about Willis having an affair was nothing more than a desperate attempt to save their #MalignantMango's bacon. The optics had zilch to do with the case.

 

[archives]

I think the question before the court isn't a question of 'fair trial', but the question of the conduct of the parties, and whether the charges were brought for personal gain. I agree with the decision of the judge. I actually think Willis should have stepped aside and assigned this to someone else in the office, but at this point, other than grist for the Trump cult mill, this issue is put to bed. My two cents. It was a distraction because of the high profile nature of this case, but motions to dismiss are very common in probably every trial. Any lawyer worth their salt makes sure they get anything and everything on the record in anticipation that a defendant will appeal.

But it was the Trump lawyers who bought the case against her arguing that it would influence their defendant’s case

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Let's see, go into court with a competent prosecutor or a dummy with egg all over her face?

Nice. I see you bought some words instead of just using memes. You might want to get your money back. You got dumb words, not smart ones.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Still don’t understand why the DA being caught fooling around, even considering some suspicious financial arrangements, had anything to do with the case of Trump being prosecuted for fraudulently trying to change the election in Georgia. How does any of this weigh against him receiving a fair trial? How does it even effect him or his trial?

It doesn't and it has nothing to do with the case or the trial. It's just another desperate attempt by his enablers to get #TRE45ON off the hook for one of his many crimes.

 

[anonymoose]

Well said, thanks. The whole poutrage about Willis having an affair was nothing more than a desperate attempt to save their #MalignantMango's bacon. The optics had zilch to do with the case.

Optics weren’t good. Wade had never prosecuted a felony case yet was being paid a pretty penny by his lover who arguably could share that money with her.. Sure that’s a stretch but entirely possible.
It was a good ruling by the judge.

 

[domer76]

lead prosecutor KICKED OFF CASE


Does that always happen when they do nothing wrong?

He’s hardly the lead prosecutor. His role was mainly administrative. Assembling and managing the prosecution team. He was never going to be the prosecutor in the courtroom. A pretty easy position to replace.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Professionally and personally "Fanny's" got no credibility left... this was a great decision on the judge's part... this is just getting good...

The irony of someone who pretends to have once been an educator gossiping about an accomplished woman's supposed cred.

Her name is Fani, btw, and is pronounced Fahn-nee. Your childish attempt to diminish her is noted, TOXIC.

 

[archives]

Since this judge has now finally ruled, Trumps team can Appeal his ruling. Had this judge never agreed to hearing the case, then there would be no appeal until a verdict, but now it is fair game to be seen my a federal judge.

Thus this is NOT over.

Of course it is not, the only purpose Trump initiated the case was to extend and delay his racketeering trial beyond November, Will Hurd is right, Trump is running for President to stay out of jail, which is why in the election Trump will never admit defeat regardless of his refusals effect on the country