SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR: We did NOT exonerate Joe Biden

Lionfish said:
Poor anchovies, quoted from the ACTUAL document. You can read more excerpts of the ACTUAL document here

"The full transcript provides a more complete window into the back and forth between the two men, in which Biden frequently joked with prosecutors in a setting that seemed more chummy than antagonistic. (“I just warn you all: Never make one great eulogy because you get asked to do everybody’s eulogy,” Biden said at one point.) But the president also frequently digressed, with stories about trips to Mongolia and about the time he helped represent a client who lost one testicle and part of his penis. He also later twice mimicked the sounds of a car.

Biden spoke of working “in my pajamas” while at the Naval Observatory, made light of his poor spelling (“If it’s spelled right, it’s probably not”), and laughed off a photo of him with a onetime ally. (“You can tell it’s old. I have my arm around Lindsey Graham.”) He joked about how much time the FBI spent inside his home during the documents probe — “The FBI know my house better than I do” — and about what agents may have discovered.

“I just hope you didn’t find any risqué pictures of my wife in a bathing suit,” the president told federal prosecutors. “Which you probably did. She’s beautiful.”

“My problem was I never knew where any of the documents of boxes were specifically coming from or who packed them,” he said. “Just did I get them delivered to me. And so this is — I’m, at this stage, in 2009, am I still vice president?”

He also digressed with a story about visiting Mongolia and using a bow and arrow to strike a bale of hay (“Pure luck, I hit the godd--- target,” he said, before handing the bow to the prime minister. “The poor son of a b---- couldn’t pull it back. I was, I was like Oh God.”)

At times during the interview, according to the transcript, the president made noises like a car. Once, it was while lamenting that he could drive his vintage Chevrolet Corvette only the length of his driveway. The other time was during a lengthy exchange over the torque of electric vehicles.
Click to expand...

Still wrong, sure he read from the primary source, cherry picked content often out of context, favorite trick on any political talking head, easy to do, there were 345 pages to chose from, duh
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
You definitely must be senile. You don't seem to know the difference between the name you used vs the name of the actual President.
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/12/biden-hur-transcript-classified-documents/

710.jpeg
 
PostmodernProphet said:
NOW you think he's right?........
Click to expand...
Hur's testimony and report is interesting. He appears to be doing exactly what the Democrats accused Comey of doing.

Despite all the politics and other bullshit, Hur is smart enough to realize the laws involved, the common practices in DC (Let's not forget about Pence, eh?) and the fact that Biden, like Pence, cooperated 100%. He also knows how vengeful, spiteful and hateful the MAGAts have become on the Hill.

Like Comey, I think he's dancing on a very thin line trying to be honest, serve justice and still have a career at the end of the day.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Hur's testimony and report is interesting. He appears to be doing exactly what the Democrats accused Comey of doing.

Despite all the politics and other bullshit, Hur is smart enough to realize the laws involved, the common practices in DC (Let's not forget about Pence, eh?) and the fact that Biden, like Pence, cooperated 100%. He also knows how vengeful, spiteful and hateful the MAGAts have become on the Hill.

Like Comey, I think he's dancing on a very thin line trying to be honest, serve justice and still have a career at the end of the day.
Click to expand...

or he's simply telling folks what he saw and heard......
 
ExpressLane said:
If he was a "MAGAt" he wouldn't have let Biden off by not indicting him.
Click to expand...

The man isn't stupid enough to risk losing his reputation over lies and unethical comments.

Why are you having such trouble accepting Hur's many comments saying "we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top