Nonsense, Pobre.
After Donald Trump was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point. Despite Carroll's claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense.
You simply do not understand the ruling.
As the Judge clarified in the second case, where Trump tried to sue E Jean for defamation when she said he raped her, the only thing the Jury struggled with was whether Trump had penetrated E Jean with his fingers or Penis or BOTH and since E Jean said she could not know for certain, by New York State OUTLIAR legal definition, the Jury had to find 'Sexual Assault', since rape in NYS requires the penis be used.
BUt MOST States and the Federal Government more importantly, consider rape has been done legally if a person is forcibly penetrated by many different means (fingers, penis, broom handle, other) and that is what the Judge used when he RULED that in FACT Trump had raped E Jean, because Trump lives in the US and by Federal definition what Trump did WAS RAPE.
So HERE IS THE ONLY REPLY you magats can really use....
'Sure by the country of US standards (Federal), Trump is NOW considered a rapist, but by NYS he is not', and if you think that is some kind of win, then great for you.
Think of it this way. If Trump had penetrated E Jean in the way he did, in a State where that is considered rape and someone called Trump a rapist, but you lived in NYS, and said 'no he is not as NYS State definition is different', everyone would think you an idiot. So by standards used by America (Federal Statute) TRUMP IS A RACIST and everyone in America can say it corrects.