“Multiple people hurt in shooting at Chiefs' victory parade”

[Grokmaster]

That's always a possibility...they are being very secretive... with a death and so many injuries it would almost be an automatic to charge them as adults and release their identities if they were Hometown kids...

The secrecy is always there when it is NOT "white supremacists" or anyone/anything else that fits the desired left narrative.

 

[Damocles]

It was "mass" per the definition of the number of people hit, not what the dumbass shooters were aiming at. That said, there's no official definition so use of the term varies so I prefer the FBI definition, in which case you would be correct. This isn't a "mass shooting" since less than four people were killed.

"at least four people are murdered with a gun"

https://www.politifact.com/article/2023/feb/14/what-counts-as-a-mass-shooting-the-definition-vari/


https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/analysis-recent-mass-shootings

This one would not fit then. Only one was murdered. Multiple others were wounded. This didn't appear to be a "shoot people randomly" event, it was more of a "fight spreads and others are also wounded" event.

I get why folks who want to limit all guns would want to characterize all shootings in public as a "mass shooting" but not all of them are. There was no goal to kill random folks here, there was just careless disregard for their safety as they got in a fight and pulled out guns in a crowd trying to "get" their "enemies". Juveniles were arrested for this.. Holy moly... What a mess.

 

[Grokmaster]

“KANSAS CITY, Mo. -- Shots were fired at the end of the Kansas City Chiefs' Super Bowl parade Wednesday, injuring eight to 10 people, a fire official said. Fans were urged to exit the area as quickly as possible”

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39525845/multiple-people-hurt-shooting-chiefs-victory-parade
https://www.kmbc.com/article/shooti...city-chiefs-super-bowl-victory-rally/46790065

Guess we can now add celebratory parades to churches, parks, schools, malls, spa, senior citizen centers, restaurants, concerts, synagogues, movies, grocery stores, shopping centers, trains, etc, opps, my bad, eight people were killed via guns at a parade a year and half ago

Where can a person go now days without having to think about some gun toting guy with a grudge unexpectedly start shooting

And the right’s solution, we need more guns and easier access to more guns

 

[Dutch Uncle]

This one would not fit then. Only one was murdered. Multiple others were wounded. This didn't appear to be a "shoot people randomly" event, it was more of a "fight spreads and others are also wounded" event.

I get why folks who want to limit all guns would want to characterize all shootings in public as a "mass shooting" but not all of them are. There was no goal to kill random folks here, there was just careless disregard for their safety as they got in a fight and pulled out guns in a crowd trying to "get" their "enemies". Juveniles were arrested for this.. Holy moly... What a mess.

Correct. Agreed the shooters were just shooting at each other, gangsta-style, and spraying bullets in a tightly packed area.

This appears to be gang-activity, not a mad killer looking create a mass casualty event and then die by his own hand or suicide-by-cop as seen in the mental illness events. The idiots involved will spend the rest of their lives in prison for their altercation.

 

[Bigdog]

I stand by my claim. You cannot refute it, so you resort to nonsense.

Given the rampant inbreeding in your family, I guess you just aren't capable of intelligent discussion.

You have no evidence, LOSER.

 

[Althea]

You have no evidence, LOSER.

You still here?

 

[Althea]

This one would not fit then. Only one was murdered. Multiple others were wounded. This didn't appear to be a "shoot people randomly" event, it was more of a "fight spreads and others are also wounded" event.

I get why folks who want to limit all guns would want to characterize all shootings in public as a "mass shooting" but not all of them are. There was no goal to kill random folks here, there was just careless disregard for their safety as they got in a fight and pulled out guns in a crowd trying to "get" their "enemies". Juveniles were arrested for this.. Holy moly... What a mess.

That makes it better?

 

[Into the Night]

Couldn’t be any more wrong:

The Looser a State's Gun Laws, the More Mass Shootings It Has
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/5504

State gun laws, gun ownership, and mass shootings in the US
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/308...tm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=research-news

Firearm legislation and firearm-related fatalities in the United States
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/234...tm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=research-news

Where there are more guns there is more homicide
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/firearms-research/guns-and-death/

Research shows lax laws fuel violence.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...t-gun-laws-could-reduce-violence/11111232002/

What is a person who labels another a liar and then is proven using facts to be 100% wrong?

Quoting biased blogs and newspapers is not 'facts'. A fact is not a Universal Truth nor a proof. Learn what 'fact' means.
I have already given you several examples that debunk your argument (and the arguments presented in the blogs and newspapers you quote as 'proof').

Argument of the Stone fallacy. False authority fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

You are beyond reasoning, common sense, and ethics- SIMPLY FOR SOME VERY SELFISH REASONS.

So, find someone else to plead your case with.

It's not going to be me SIR!

He already won 'his case'. You are just sour grapes.

 

[Into the Night]

I would say most FFL dealers are very honest. But I know to many first hand experiences where exceptions to the rule just happens in back room deals in the parking lots etc.

I knew of one man who was a gun dealer that operated under his FFL license, who ended up losing his license to deal over it, because of some of his back-room deals.

Such a license is unconstitutional, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

I don't care what you do in your state. END OF STORY!

You obviously do, liar.

I seriously doubt you register your cars, trucks, and tractors there Mr. Green Jeans!

But, if you do- WHY DO YOU? BECAUSE IT IS THE LAW MAYBE?

A car or truck is not a gun, and no, you don't have to register any car or truck in any State unless you want to drive it on public roads.

 

[Into the Night]

Emphasize enforcement of the laws instead of making more oppressive laws. Criminals exist and, therefore, law enforcement is a must.

Good to see the system work. I have no sympathy for criminals, terrorists or traitors.

Blatant lie. You have called for civil war multiple times.

 

[Into the Night]

Well, let's call it selling and buying guns, from and to, non licensed dealers- for short.

You do not see a loophole there that circumvents the entire Background Check process?

I thought the goal was to keep guns out of the wrong hands?

Either it is- or it is not?!

You can't have it both ways Sir!

It is not possible to keep guns out of 'the wrong hands'. You can stop a bad guy with a gun with a good guy with a gun though.

 

[Into the Night]

yes, we know you despise religion. From someone who is NOT religious, the right to own a weapon for self defense is primary. we have the natural right to self preservation using ANY weapon at our disposal. denying that right is indicative of a lack of respect for someones life.

All they can do is attempt to deny that right. That right, however, is inherent. It is not possible to deny it.
Yes, it is disrespect for someone's life and welfare.

Democrats don't care about the people, or kids, or women, or of any particular race. They disrespect them all. ALL of them are just pawns to Democrats.

 

[Into the Night]

No Sir!

I am really on your side, but you are unable to see it.

Blatant lie. You can't get away with denying your own posts, Sock.

I am not trying to take your guns away stupid!

Blatant lie.

I am just trying to make sure you can still keep and carry your guns, and keep the public safer at the same time.

Blatant lie.

Because with my plan- we can do both!

Paradox. Irrational.

So please, just stop OK!

Protecting guns by taking them away doesn't work, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Oh, so God would nave no problem with you circling your property with Claymore mines, you never know when Attila and the Huns are going to stop by

What has any god or gods got do with it? You seem to be mighty religious.

The right to self defense is inherent. No god or gods necessary. That right extends to the use of ANY weapon.

 

[Into the Night]

I stand by my claim. You cannot refute it, so you resort to nonsense.

Given the rampant inbreeding in your family, I guess you just aren't capable of intelligent discussion.

You are not making an argument, nor are you having an intelligent discussion about anything.
Void argument fallacy. Mantra 1a.

 

[Into the Night]

Correct. Agreed the shooters were just shooting at each other, gangsta-style, and spraying bullets in a tightly packed area.

This appears to be gang-activity, not a mad killer looking create a mass casualty event and then die by his own hand or suicide-by-cop as seen in the mental illness events. The idiots involved will spend the rest of their lives in prison for their altercation.

No, they won't. They will probably be out on the streets in hours or just a few days. This 'catch and release' idiocy has to stop.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Blatant lie. You have called for civil war multiple times.

If that were true, you'd post a quote instead of your delusional bullshit, Sybil.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

No, they won't. They will probably be out on the streets in hours or just a few days. This 'catch and release' idiocy has to stop.

^^^
More Sybilian delusional bullshit.

Are you planning to go out and shoot black people, Sybil?