John Fetterman: "It's time for the GOP to get their...

SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers

Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190

Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.
 
Then the banks got caught cheating their asses off


And then the result of their cheating the people it crashed the economy
 
evince said:
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers

Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190

Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.
Click to expand...

this is a very bad idea.
 
SEC Votes for Final Rules Defining How Banks Can Be Securities Brokers

Eight Years After Passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, Key Provisions Will Now Be Implemented

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2007-190

Washington, D.C., Sept. 19, 2007 - Ending eight years of stalled negotiations and impasse, the Commission today voted to adopt, jointly with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), new rules that will finally implement the bank broker provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. The Board will consider these final rules at its Sept. 24, 2007 meeting. The Commission and the Board consulted with and sought the concurrence of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and Office of Thrift Supervision.

In addition, the Commission also voted to issue a second release concerning certain bank dealer activities and other related matters.
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Cox



Charles Christopher Cox (born October 16, 1952) is an American attorney and politician who served as chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, a 17-year Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, and member of the White House staff in the Reagan Administration. Prior to his Washington service he was a practicing attorney, teacher, and entrepreneur.[1] Following his retirement from government in 2009, he returned to law practice and currently serves as a director, trustee, and advisor to several for-profit and nonprofit organizations.
 
QP! said:
No you lied as always.

If i say, i can stop the water flooding your basement if you give me the wrench.

And you refuse to give me the wrench, and yet you tell others 'he said he could stop the water... why did not he not stop the water'.

You are LYING by not saying i said i needed the wrench, you refused to give me.
Click to expand...

Lying is what fake teachers and fake Xtians do best. How many people do you think she's convinced of these lies today? I'm going with

iVfWImG.jpg


Like several of our other MAGAT trolls here, she's in it for the attention. Sad, really.
 
QP! said:
No you lied as always.

If i say, i can stop the water flooding your basement if you give me the wrench.

And you refuse to give me the wrench, and yet you tell others 'he said he could stop the water... why did not he not stop the water'.

You are LYING by not saying i said i needed the wrench, you refused to give me.
Click to expand...

They are simply pointing out that you have a wrench in both of your frickin' hands and a toolbox with seven more in it right at your feet and you refuse to use the wrenches you have on hand and insist you need that new one, and you'll hold your breath until you get it.
 
christiefan915 said:
...balls out of trump's desk..." :laugh: Fetterman's got his mojo back and we Dems are here for it. Pay attention, trumpers.

Full quote: [FONT=&]"It's time for the GOP to get their balls out of Trump's desk and vote for what you've just been yelling for for the last months, and we need to stand with all of it," the Pennsylvania Democrat told [/FONT]Newsweek [FONT=&]Tuesday.

[/FONT][FONT=&]He continued: "We need to stand with all of it. Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan. We have border security. Here it is right there—vote."

Rest of article here.[/FONT]
Click to expand...
Girlie.You stupid bitch, Your elected Democrat has only seen the truth, he has gone conservative.You??????????????? A dumbass welfare collecting white woman??????????????????? STFU
 
QP! said:
No you lied as always.

If i say, i can stop the water flooding your basement if you give me the wrench.

And you refuse to give me the wrench, and yet you tell others 'he said he could stop the water... why did not he not stop the water'.

You are LYING by not saying i said i needed the wrench, you refused to give me.
Click to expand...
He has the wrench...He just has to try to remember where he threw it away...And it's clear he's not interested in doing that...or, sadly, he really can't recall...
( Hint: Go Back to Day One of his Administration...it's right there...)
 
QP! said:
No you lied as always.

If i say, i can stop the water flooding your basement if you give me the wrench.

And you refuse to give me the wrench, and yet you tell others 'he said he could stop the water... why did not he not stop the water'.

You are LYING by not saying i said i needed the wrench, you refused to give me.
Click to expand...

its within biden's purview to fire homeland security heads until he gets one that will enforce laws on the books.

but biden wants massive immigration of the poor and desperate, to replace citizens who know their rights (and also may be poor and desperate).
 
Damocles said:
They are simply pointing out that you have a wrench in both of your frickin' hands and a toolbox with seven more in it right at your feet and you refuse to use the wrenches you have on hand and insist you need that new one, and you'll hold your breath until you get it.
Click to expand...

There 'belief' that i have 'adequate tools' is irrelevant to the accusation and the lie.

Damocles : I need you to give me that wrench and then i can stop the flooding

Others : we refuse to give you the wrench

Flooding occurs.

Others : he said he could stop the flooding and then refused. Why did he refuse.

Damocles : You are lying. I told you i needed the wrench and you refused to give it to me


That others would say, 'we believe you already have enough tools' (our opinion) DOES NOT allow the others, if being honest to exclude HIS OPINION, that he needs the wrench.


If what you are asserting is true Damocles, every 'difference of opinion' could be asserted that dishonest., A general saying what he needs to go in to battle and secure a win. The refusal to give him that. And then the claim he 'said he could win the battle', ' but then refused to fight it'.

It is the height of dishonest to EXCLUDE the modifying qualifier when that is core to the person position. If you disagree 'include the PROPER quote' and simply say you disagree.
 
TOP said:
He has the wrench...He just has to try to remember where he threw it away...And it's clear he's not interested in doing that...or, sadly, he really can't recall...
( Hint: Go Back to Day One of his Administration...it's right there...)
Click to expand...
You holding a view that a person has enough, does not allow you to cut their cut their quote in them telling what they think is enough. Not if you are being honest.

Regardless, If it was there in Day 1 of his administration, then it was there in Trumps admin.

I reject your claim it was there but if you continue to asset it was, why did Trump not use it?
 
QP! said:
You holding a view that a person has enough, does not allow you to cut their cut their quote in them telling what they think is enough. Not if you are being honest.

Regardless, If it was there in Day 1 of his administration, then it was there in Trumps admin.
:palm:
I reject your claim it was there but if you continue to asset it was, why did Trump not use it?
Click to expand...

I can quote whatever I think is necessary... it's fact that he's caused the Border problems and it's his responsibility to fix them... and if he can't remember what he did with the wrench then he better go looking for it... who leaves the water running for 3 years anyway? And never does a thing.. Never even goes and looks at it? Puts someone else in charge of the repair and they don't go either...smh
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top