Cops beaten by rowdy migrant mob NYC— with suspects later freed without bail

ExpressLane said:
I hope Trump pardon anyone that was imprisoned if they were non violent.
Click to expand...

Yes.

This becoming president is what we have to stop, no matter what


VP Harris helped anti-cop rioters in 2020 while Biden now attacks ‘political violence’

"On Thursday, President Joe Biden spoke on the one-year anniversary of the Jan. 6 storming of the U.S. Capitol, warning against the U.S. becoming a nation that “accepts political violence as a norm.” However, just months before the events of Jan. 6, 2021, Biden’s running mate Kamala Harris had promoted a bail fund that helped to release suspects charged with violent crimes during riots in the summer of 2020.

In June 2020, days after George Floyd, a black man, died in Minneapolis Police Custody, then-Senator Kamala Harris called on supporters to donate to the Minnesota Freedom Fund (MFF). MFF raises money to help post bail. “If you’re able to, chip in now to the @MNFreedomFund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota,” Harris tweeted at the time.
Increasingly anti-police riots continued throughout the summer of 2020. A federal courthouse in Portland, Oregon was under near-nightly attack for weeks, with rioters throwing bricks, rocks, fireworks and incendiary Molotov cocktails at federal officers. Several federal officers in Portland, Oregon also risked the potential of being permanently blinded as lasers were flashed in their eyes.

https://americanmilitarynews.com/20...0-while-biden-now-attacks-political-violence/

None of this violence was perpetrated by the right. None of it. And they're getting away with it.
 
Bigdog said:
Nope. They finally aired the video. After watching it, what is your opinion of the gov't releasing the violent offenders?
Click to expand...

Considering their flight risk, they shouldn't have been released. If they were able to post a significant bond, then their release should have been contingent on precautions like prohibiting them from leaving the state.
 
Diesel said:
Considering their flight risk, they shouldn't have been released. If they were able to post a significant bond, then their release should have been contingent on precautions like prohibiting them from leaving the state.
Click to expand...

Thanks.

IMO, a danger to society so no release back into the community, no bail.
 
Bigdog said:
Thanks.

IMO, a danger to society so no release back into the community, no bail.
Click to expand...

That's fine. You're going to have a hard time finding anyone to support releasing 4 illegal immigrants on their own recognizance after attacking the NYPD.
 
Diesel said:
That's fine. You're going to have a hard time finding anyone to support releasing 4 illegal immigrants on their own recognizance after attacking the NYPD.
Click to expand...

I said, "a danger to society so no release back into the community".
 
Bigdog said:
I said, "a danger to society so no release back into the community".
Click to expand...

And I said you're going to have a hard time finding someone to disagree with you. You're clearly desperate for an argument, but I've already made myself clear multiple times.
 
Diesel said:
And I said you're going to have a hard time finding someone to disagree with you. You're clearly desperate for an argument, but I've already made myself clear multiple times.
Click to expand...

Yes, you are for releasing them on bail. I am not.

If they were able to post a significant bond, then their release should have been contingent on precautions like prohibiting them from leaving the state.
Click to expand...
 
Bigdog said:
Yes, you are for releasing them on bail. I am not.
Click to expand...

That is not what I said. Try again.

My words: "Considering their flight risk, they shouldn't have been released. If they were able to post a significant bond, then their release should have been contingent on precautions like prohibiting them from leaving the state."

I don't think they should have been released, but that's not my call. I do, however, think that whatever the judge's reason was for releasing them (you and I certainly have no idea), should have included bail so significant with so many precautions that they wouldn't be on their way to Mexico right now.

Again, you're desperately and annoyingly looking for an argument where none exists.
 
volsrock said:
Cops beaten by rowdy migrant mob near Times Square — with suspects later freed without bail: horrifying video

https://nypost.com/2024/01/30/metro...square-and-suspects-later-freed-without-bail/



January 6th defendant who shoved a DC cop from behind was sentenced to 78 months in prison.
Click to expand...
That's nothing compared to the assholes sent by trump to force their way into the capital to kill the vice president and overturn the election to bring down our government and country.Everyone of those scumball traitors should have been shot dead, Trying to overthrow this country. Next time they will be. . My only question to these traitors that support Shitpants is if they will be among the people who will kill for Trump when he asks. At this point it is the only question worth asking.
 
Bigdog said:
I said, "a danger to society so no release back into the community".
Click to expand...
This asshole discourages by association Martin Luther king who would spit on this scum bag if he met him on the street. There should be a law that scum bags can't use patriots pictures when they are traitors to this country themselves.
 
Yes, a crime was committed. NO ONE IS DEFENDING THE PERPETRATORS. Unlike our resident sheet wearers and MAGA mooks, who feel the POS who brutalized the DC cops on Jan. 6th are "political prisoners".
:rolleyes:

GMAFB, will ya please?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top