House Speaker Mike Johnson has announced that he is releasing all J6 tapes today

No, she wasn't. She was given no warning, and the officer that shot her did so in direct violation of federal use of force guidelines.

She had almost two hours of warning, Terry.

If it was a Lefty doing this you'd be applauding. That's how far to the Right you have grown.

For me, I'm fine with shooting down all violent protesters. Anyone tossing rocks or gasoline at police, shoot them in the fucking head.

Anyone who violent breaches a police line threatening to murder innocent people, shoot them in the fucking head.

Next time, machine gun all of these violent protesters down when they beat down police and break through police lines. Don't worry, Terry since I know you'll be safe behind your keyboard with all the other keyboard traitors on JPP. :thup:
 
So? Were they trying to stop an election from being certified? Were they chanting "Hang Kamala Harris"? Did the president of the United States tell them to "fight like hell"? Were they any more rowdy than a group of out-of-control sports fans rioting, overturning cars, setting things on fire, and beating each other because their team won or lost? No? So where's the equivalency?

Simply protesting is not enough to warrant shooting someone. If they were protesting without a permit, fine. Arrest them. If they become violent and start attacking police, have the snipers take them out.
 
Agreed, but why did the J6 committee not both sides of the footage to the public? Think there was any bias?

There are no both sides. The Trumpys attacked the capitol to stop the electoral college certification. The other side is the police and politicians fighting for their lives. Over 140 cops were injured. What is the other side of that? Trumpys trashed the capitol crapped in the people's building. They busted down doors and windows. They stole whatever they could take. What is the other side? Is it because Trump told them to do it?
 
Simply protesting is not enough to warrant shooting someone. If they were protesting without a permit, fine. Arrest them. If they become violent and start attacking police, have the snipers take them out.

You know that old saying "If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"? That's some of our more bloodthirsty Reichwingers, only their "tool" is a gun. Unless, of course, it's one of their own violent attackers who gets capped.
 
You know that old saying "If the only tool you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail"? That's Some of our more bloodthirsty Reichwingers, only their "tool" is a gun. Unless, of course, it's one of their own violent attackers who gets capped.

Agreed which is why I classify them as terrorists, terrorist-supporters or, if they've taken the oath like DtM, Terry or Earl, as traitors.
 
So? Were they trying to stop an election from being certified? Were they chanting "Hang Kamala Harris"? Did the president of the United States tell them to "fight like hell"? Were they any more rowdy than a group of out-of-control sports fans rioting, overturning cars, setting things on fire, and beating each other because their team won or lost? No? So where's the equivalency?

Yeah, it wasn't on purpose, like when someone pulled a fire
alarm to disrupt a vote, huh? Would they let you or me off?

Those should be handled locally, with exceptions.

The equivalency is, it was overtaking a federal (capitol) building.
 
Yeah, it wasn't on purpose, like when someone pulled a fire
alarm to disrupt a vote, huh? Would they let you or me off?

Those should be handled locally, with exceptions.

The equivalency is, it was overtaking a federal (capitol) building.

Yes, pulling a fire alarm is exactly the same as storming the Capitol, injuring over 100 police officers, stealing everything not nailed down, crapping on the floor, breaking and entering, etc. etc. etc. :rolleyes:

Whether it was insurrectionists or violent protesters, if they break the law, arrest and try them. Which is exactly what happened in both the J6 insurrection, and this protest.
 
Still wondering about this one: because some of the police escorted some of the protestors - it means the other protestors weren't violently trying to overtake the Capitol?

I've never seen this line of reasoning for any crime. Would it make a difference in how we feel about the Hamas attack if they showed footage of some Israeli houses not being attacked?

next you'll be telling us 1/6 protesters decapitated and burned Congressmen's children......
 
This is what cultists do.

1/6 makes Trump look bad, and it makes his followers look bad. So, really - the best option is to pretend that what every American saw live, with their own eyes, simply didn't happen. It goes back to Conway's quote early in the Trump admin about "alternative facts."

If you don't like the reality - just invent another one.

the reality is, Demmycrats made his followers look bad to make Trump look bad......the evidence of that is you ignored worse when AntiFuck and BLM protested.......
 
Man Lionfish is an idiot. There are not 'both sides' like this is a contest. What happened that day happened. A violent attack on the US capitol and the Capitol police. If there is another 'side' it is the side of dishonesty by omission.

the two sides here are truth and your lies.......you're just upset that your lies are now visible to everyone.....
 
Yes, pulling a fire alarm is exactly the same as storming the Capitol, injuring over 100 police officers, stealing everything not nailed down, crapping on the floor, breaking and entering, etc. etc. etc. :rolleyes:

Whether it was insurrectionists or violent protesters, if they break the law, arrest and try them. Which is exactly what happened in both the J6 insurrection, and this protest.

I didn't say it was. I said those who did no damage, who were just there. Wouldn't you expect the same sentences for those protesters too?

Again, it was no insurrection. It was a bunch of unarmed and unorganized idiots. And then they left...
 
I didn't say it was. I said those who did no damage, who were just there. Wouldn't you expect the same sentences for those protesters too?

Again, it was no insurrection. It was a bunch of unarmed and unorganized idiots. And then they left...

The "just there" ones on J6 mostly got probation. They were part of the mob breaking and entering.

As for the "unarmed" thing, that is a Reichwing lie.

Tucker Carlson is wrong. Firearms, other weapons at Capitol on Jan. 6

Yes, Capitol Rioters Were Armed. Here Are The Weapons Prosecutors Say They Used


'Armed insurrection': What weapons did the Capitol rioters carry?


The last link is for the Washington Examiner, a RW rag. The partial chart below is from that link.

SQZy3Ew.jpg
 
How many people have been arrested...and detained...from the pro-Palestine riots?
Two sets of rules once again....

None jailed without bail that I know of. Not even the Portland rioters. Or the Phila riots, or the ...
 
How many people have been arrested...and detained...from the pro-Palestine riots?
Two sets of rules once again....

Wrong, as usual. :rofl2:

New York police arrest hundreds after Israel-Hamas protest at Grand Central

Police arrest anti-Israel protesters on San Francisco bridge

300-plus arrested after gathering at Capitol complex to protest Israel-Hamas war

"It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open one's mouth (or keyboard) and remove all doubt." -- A. Lincoln
 
None jailed without bail that I know of. Not even the Portland rioters. Or the Phila riots, or the ...

Double standards from our "justice system"...they're getting away with everything and anything....and not just the riots...
 
Back
Top