Majority Of Muslim Americans Believe Hamas Was ‘Justified’

One concerning finding was that the majority of Muslim Americans, 57.5%, said that they agreed that “Hamas was justified in attacking Israel as part of their struggle for a Palestinian State.”

https://www.dailywire.com/news/majo...ustified-in-its-terror-attacks-against-israel


Almost 60% here in America support Hamas

And that’s why Islam is incompatible with the rest of the world

Israel has taken nearly all of Palestine away from the people who called it home for over a thousand years, based on the unproven claim that the Jews were there first. Just because a book of fairy tales they call The Old Testament says so, but even though no artifacts or archeological evidence of any ancient Jewish kingdoms has ever been unearthed.

The Zionists were handed half the country on a silver platter, then they used their victories in conflicts as a pretext for expanding their territory by taking even more land from the Palestinians. And even that wasn't good enough, so they started building settlements in the Palestinian territory that they hadn't seized after wars.

Yet, people claim to not understand the Palestinians' rage.

Puh-lease.

Nobody likes terrorism. Nobody likes to see civilians being killed and abducted.

But there are always two sides to every story.

Israel hasn't always been completely innocent in all this.
 
Israel has taken nearly all of Palestine away from the people who called it home for over a thousand years, based on the unproven claim that the Jews were there first. Just because a book of fairy tales they call The Old Testament says so, but even though no artifacts or archeological evidence of any ancient Jewish kingdoms has ever been unearthed.

The Zionists were handed half the country on a silver platter, then they used their victories in conflicts as a pretext for expanding their territory by taking even more land from the Palestinians. And even that wasn't good enough, so they started building settlements in the Palestinian territory that they hadn't seized after wars.

Yet, people claim to not understand the Palestinians' rage.

Puh-lease.

Nobody likes terrorism. Nobody likes to see civilians being killed and abducted.

But there are always two sides to every story.

Israel hasn't always been completely innocent in all this.

who was the leader of Palestine in 1935?
 
Israel has taken nearly all of Palestine away from the people who called it home for over a thousand years, based on the unproven claim that the Jews were there first.

What did the Europeans use as justification for stealing the land of the indigenous peoples of our continent?

Looking for a good guy on this planet is the errand of a total fool.
Take the side of whom you'd prefer to win.
One of them has to be better than the other.
So either pick or accept ANY result.

Just don't annoy people with the goodie-two-shoes nonsense.
 
Israel has taken nearly all of Palestine away from the people who called it home for over a thousand years, based on the unproven claim that the Jews were there first. Just because a book of fairy tales they call The Old Testament says so, but even though no artifacts or archeological evidence of any ancient Jewish kingdoms has ever been unearthed.

The Zionists were handed half the country on a silver platter, then they used their victories in conflicts as a pretext for expanding their territory by taking even more land from the Palestinians. And even that wasn't good enough, so they started building settlements in the Palestinian territory that they hadn't seized after wars.

Yet, people claim to not understand the Palestinians' rage.

Puh-lease.

Nobody likes terrorism. Nobody likes to see civilians being killed and abducted.

But there are always two sides to every story.

Israel hasn't always been completely innocent in all this.



Israel came first. Palestine is the Roman name for Israel, which the Romans imposed on it after crushing the Bar Kokhba revolt. This was done to erase all memory of the Jews and their origins/history in Israel.

The Jews are the only religious group who ever had a sovereign, independent kingdom embracing all, or almost all, of what is currently called Israel

“Palestine” got its name only after Rome finally conquered and dissolved the Kingdom of Judea ...which is where the English word “Jew” comes from




Modern Jews descended from the ancient Canaanites. Which were the first people in the region
 
Last edited:
What did the Europeans use as justification for stealing the land of the indigenous peoples of our continent?

Which group of indigenous peoples are we talking about here? A couple of examples where there was no "stealing of land" but rather conquest due to declared war which included declarations by Native American tribes...

The first is the French and Indian war. This was an extension of the Seven Years War in Europe carried to the Americas. Both the French and British enlisted--willingly too--the support and alliance of various Native American tribes to fight with them against the other. Most of the tribes broke along internal warfare lines they already had. That is, there was warfare among the tribes and they sided with the French or British because their enemy tribe(s) sided with the other.

At the end of that war, tribes that sided with Britain were rewarded and left intact. Those that had sided with France, and were now on the losing side, saw their land confiscated and their tribes dispersed. Nothing unusual for the time period for that to happen.

During the War of 1812, the Great Lakes tribes under Tecumseh sided with Britain hoping to win more land and protect their current lands. The British and Americans negotiated a peace in 1815, and the British left those tribes to swing in the wind. The US saw them as defeated enemies and annexed their lands as spoils of war as was the custom at the time.

The Plains tribes (aka Lakota etc.) and Apache as two examples, had no specific lands or territories. They were hunter-gatherers and raiders. They moved over the landscape and didn't establish any sort of permanent sites where they lived. That amorphous nature of their existence made it difficult for them to claim some lands as theirs when basically anyone could move across it or even settle on it.

A clear case of stealing land is Andrew Jackson's forced removal of the Cherokee to Oklahoma (aka The Trail of Tears). That was, indeed, a raw land grab and wrong. But don't go making sweeping generalizations about what Europeans or Americans did in N. America. You have a stronger case for this being done by Spain and France in the Caribbean and in Central and South America.
 
In the region. A way to attack Iraq, Iran, or other Muslim nations we want to control.

We have never used Israel as a staging ground for military action within that region, at least until now. It does appear that Biden intends to use Israel as a staging ground for US special forces to operate elsewhere in the region.
 
Which group of indigenous peoples are we talking about here? A couple of examples where there was no "stealing of land" but rather conquest due to declared war which included declarations by Native American tribes...

The first is the French and Indian war. This was an extension of the Seven Years War in Europe carried to the Americas. Both the French and British enlisted--willingly too--the support and alliance of various Native American tribes to fight with them against the other. Most of the tribes broke along internal warfare lines they already had. That is, there was warfare among the tribes and they sided with the French or British because their enemy tribe(s) sided with the other.

At the end of that war, tribes that sided with Britain were rewarded and left intact. Those that had sided with France, and were now on the losing side, saw their land confiscated and their tribes dispersed. Nothing unusual for the time period for that to happen.

During the War of 1812, the Great Lakes tribes under Tecumseh sided with Britain hoping to win more land and protect their current lands. The British and Americans negotiated a peace in 1815, and the British left those tribes to swing in the wind. The US saw them as defeated enemies and annexed their lands as spoils of war as was the custom at the time.

The Plains tribes (aka Lakota etc.) and Apache as two examples, had no specific lands or territories. They were hunter-gatherers and raiders. They moved over the landscape and didn't establish any sort of permanent sites where they lived. That amorphous nature of their existence made it difficult for them to claim some lands as theirs when basically anyone could move across it or even settle on it.

A clear case of stealing land is Andrew Jackson's forced removal of the Cherokee to Oklahoma (aka The Trail of Tears). That was, indeed, a raw land grab and wrong. But don't go making sweeping generalizations about what Europeans or Americans did in N. America. You have a stronger case for this being done by Spain and France in the Caribbean and in Central and South America.

I don't see anything in the above that puts us in a better light than the European Jews setting up shop in the Middle East.

As I explained, I'm not looking for a good guy.
Too futile an errand.
I'm deciding whom I'd rather see win.
 
Always. For example, when it was illegal to sell certain military planes to Turkey, Israel sold them. Our 'great' ally, right? Doing the dirty work.

They aren't an ally in the sense they have no military treaties with us. Israel also sells military hardware to a number of nations. Are you trying to say they're guilty of something for doing what every major arms manufacturing nation on the planet does?
 
They aren't an ally in the sense they have no military treaties with us. Israel also sells military hardware to a number of nations. Are you trying to say they're guilty of something for doing what every major arms manufacturing nation on the planet does?

No, nothing you said was my point.
 
Back
Top