Give up the bullshit “in 1960” argument. 1960 was 63 years ago. It will never be 1960 again.
Stupid fucking argument
And slavery ended 158 years ago....so people can STFU about it
Give up the bullshit “in 1960” argument. 1960 was 63 years ago. It will never be 1960 again.
Stupid fucking argument
He was a law abiding gun owner.
Until he wasn’t.
like I asked badguy, do you think the government should prohibit individuals from owning any tool or weapon that could be used to hurt people?
You're the one putting the "any tool" stipulation on that, in a pathetic attempt to tee up a counter argument about hammers or some retarded shit.
yes, because it exposes your hypocritical bullshit. you either want to save lives, or you only want to remove something from society that you fear. Since you don't want to remove all dangerous implements of violence from civilians to save lives, it then becomes obvious that you only want guns taken away because they terrify you. If that is truly the case, you need to start with government entities, given the over 262 million deaths that they have wrought upon their own populations.
predictable idiotic response from someone who can't think for themselves
Correct. Same goes for the old geezer who runs down a bunch of people at a bus stop; he was a law-abiding driver....until he wasn't.
The problem here isn't the guns but nutjobs who have access to guns. The vast majority of mass shootings like this were known to be nutjobs before they committed mass murder; Nikolas Cruz, Dylann Roof, and Payton Gendron. Why weren't they stopped, treated and sent off to have a happy life?
Note that Darrell E. Brooks Jr., the Waukesha Christmas Parade killer of 6, injuring 62, had multiple crimes against him including rape and gun charges and a history domestic violence. His mother noted that he had a long history of mental health problems, duh, but couldn't afford treatment. TBH, most nutjobs don't seek treatment unless forced and I doubt Brooks would have been any different. He was a "law abiding driver until he wasn't".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waukesha_Christmas_parade_attack#Perpetrator
And slavery ended 158 years ago....so people can STFU about it
“Derp” is reserved for only the stupidest of posts. You routinely earn it.
According to the gun law on the books in Maine his guns should have been taken away and he should have been flagged and banned from buying one...THAT DIDNT HAPPEN
This nut made threats to shoot up blow up an Army base and NOTHING WAS DONE Maines gun law was ignored by Maine
To issue a yellow flag order, a person is taken into protective custody by police and brought to a hospital. Officers fill out a statement arguing that they’ve determined a person is a danger to themselves or others and how they know the person has access to a weapon.
That all gets evaluated and sent to a judge, who makes the official order that an officer must serve within 24 hours. Within 14 days, there’s a hearing to determine if the order will stay in place.
Anyone under a restriction cannot possess or buy any weapons and faces arrest if they do. They’re also put on a registry that’s sent out to licensed gun dealers. If they didn’t give their weapons to a family member for safekeeping, police will seize them until the order is lifted.
https://www.pressherald.com/2023/06...ag-law-to-seize-weapons-from-those-in-crisis/
This law was not enforced on this nut and it should have been....if it had been GOOD chance the shooting may have never happened
thankfully I don't have to worry too much about your classifications because they aren't worth anything to anyone
The US has no more mental health illness than any other country.
Great, we can agree on gun confiscation for large parts of the population.
According to the gun law on the books in Maine his guns should have been taken away and he should have been flagged and banned from buying one...THAT DIDNT HAPPEN
This nut made threats to shoot up blow up an Army base and NOTHING WAS DONE Maines gun law was ignored by Maine
To issue a yellow flag order, a person is taken into protective custody by police and brought to a hospital. Officers fill out a statement arguing that they’ve determined a person is a danger to themselves or others and how they know the person has access to a weapon.
That all gets evaluated and sent to a judge, who makes the official order that an officer must serve within 24 hours. Within 14 days, there’s a hearing to determine if the order will stay in place.
Anyone under a restriction cannot possess or buy any weapons and faces arrest if they do. They’re also put on a registry that’s sent out to licensed gun dealers. If they didn’t give their weapons to a family member for safekeeping, police will seize them until the order is lifted.
https://www.pressherald.com/2023/06...ag-law-to-seize-weapons-from-those-in-crisis/
This law was not enforced on this nut and it should have been....if it had been GOOD chance the shooting may have never happened
“Vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society because they are not mentioned in the Constitution.
That is the number one ‘derp’ comment ever made on this forum.
Congrsts!
Those laws have proved time and time again to be ineffective. AR-15's need to be removed from circulation, starting with outlawing sale and possession.
WHAT GUN LAW WOULD HAVE STOPPED THE NUT?
Gun laws that reduce the access to guns that are specifically designed as weapons of war for the most effective mass human casualty events.
we decline to acquiesce to your request. your move.
do you not think that there are hundreds of us out here who know how to machine our own weapons? I can make 10 AR-15s a month on my own.
Gun laws that reduce the access to guns that are specifically designed as weapons of war for the most effective mass human casualty events.