Rashida Tlaib Doubles Down on Blaming Israel, Biden for Gaza Hospital Attack

T. A. Gardner said:
Here's Omar's and the radical Left's --yes, yes, one in the same thing-- view of how things between Palestinians (Hamas and other terrorists she supports) and Israel are supposed to work in their view:

Hamas unleashes a massive attack on Israel, killing and wounding thousands. Israel is supposed to call immediately for a ceasefire while apologizing for reacting with violence to stop the killings...
Click to expand...
These Hamas monsters are going to get the punishment that is coming to them. If they kill hostages every last one of them should be killed. I'd open up the sewers and then flood the tunnels with shit and water and I'd shoot every rat that climbed out.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Seeing Arabs fly two airliners into the WTC? No. See that Islamic Jihadists hate Americans and had a fetish for the WTC? Yes.

Hillary and Kerry both voted for the Iraq Resolution along with most Democrats. They all had dirty hands, Althea.
Click to expand...
Well yes. Out of context you can make that statement. Remember 'Freedom Fries', because France wasn't on board?

Remember every car in the nation flying Chinese made American flags?

Remember how the term 'patriotism' was weaponized? News organizations were threatened if they dared to speak out against Bush's illegal impending invasion of Iraq. Yes, most Democrats who voted to give him limited power did so due to political pressure. This, after numerous amendments were voted down in both the House and Senate that severely limited the scope of Bush's ability to wage unnecessary war.

Congress gave Bush 60 days to make his case. Nothing more. They certainly did NOT encourage him to begin by 'Shocking and Awing' innocent women and children.

The Iraq Resolution 'encouraged and supported' diplomatic efforts via the U.N FIRST.

We all know what happened. And the second time you voted for him was long after his hands were dirty.

I know you wouldn't vote for a Dem, but Nader was all the rage still.
 
Althea said:
Agree. The Squad does tend to make radical statements and individually they call for some radical legislation/funding. But with Pelosi at the helm they mostly fell in line when absolutely necessary. If the votes weren't going to be close, they were free to make their political statements by voting to impress 'their base'.


That's nowhere near as crazy as the radical Right.

I do love AOC in her committee hearings. She, like Porter know their shit and tend to make the people in the hot seat squirm.

At least AOC does her homework. The M.T Greene klan isn't even literate.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with that. Watching AOC and Porter question witnesses is like watching a surgeon perform. Greene, Boebert, Gaetz, and Jordan can't even form a sentence.
 
Diesel said:
I completely agree with that. Watching AOC and Porter question witnesses is like watching a surgeon perform. Greene, Boebert, Gaetz, and Jordan can't even form a sentence.
Click to expand...
Rendering this down to its most basic form, the majority on the Right aren't 'for' anything, and are 'against' everything.

Do you notice that nobody in this Speaker's fiasco even has a policy proposal?

"Owning the Libs" isn't a platform. It's troll bait on the internet.

And we've all been around the block enough times to know that the only time their platform of reducing spending occurs when Democrats hold the White House.
 
Althea said:
Well yes. Out of context you can make that statement. Remember 'Freedom Fries', because France wasn't on board?

Remember every car in the nation flying Chinese made American flags?

Remember how the term 'patriotism' was weaponized? News organizations were threatened if they dared to speak out against Bush's illegal impending invasion of Iraq. Yes, most Democrats who voted to give him limited power did so due to political pressure. This, after numerous amendments were voted down in both the House and Senate that severely limited the scope of Bush's ability to wage unnecessary war.

Congress gave Bush 60 days to make his case. Nothing more. They certainly did NOT encourage him to begin by 'Shocking and Awing' innocent women and children.

The Iraq Resolution 'encouraged and supported' diplomatic efforts via the U.N FIRST.

We all know what happened. And the second time you voted for him was long after his hands were dirty.

I know you wouldn't vote for a Dem, but Nader was all the rage still.
Click to expand...

Kerry supported the resolution, but he didn't support the war. He was clear about that, and by the 2004 election, we all knew that Cheney and Bush had started an unjustified war.
 
Althea said:
Well yes. Out of context you can make that statement. Remember 'Freedom Fries', because France wasn't on board?

Remember every car in the nation flying Chinese made American flags?

Remember how the term 'patriotism' was weaponized? News organizations were threatened if they dared to speak out against Bush's illegal impending invasion of Iraq. Yes, most Democrats who voted to give him limited power did so due to political pressure. This, after numerous amendments were voted down in both the House and Senate that severely limited the scope of Bush's ability to wage unnecessary war.

Congress gave Bush 60 days to make his case. Nothing more. They certainly did NOT encourage him to begin by 'Shocking and Awing' innocent women and children.

The Iraq Resolution 'encouraged and supported' diplomatic efforts via the U.N FIRST.

We all know what happened. And the second time you voted for him was long after his hands were dirty.

I know you wouldn't vote for a Dem, but Nader was all the rage still.
Click to expand...

Nice try attempting to deflect away from the Democratic vote on the Iraq Resolution. Soooo....are you claiming they were stupid or just weak?

Yes, I remember Freedom Fries and American flags made in China....just like Trump's MAGA hats. LOL
 
Althea said:
Rendering this down to its most basic form, the majority on the Right aren't 'for' anything, and are 'against' everything.

Do you notice that nobody in this Speaker's fiasco even has a policy proposal?

"Owning the Libs" isn't a platform. It's troll bait on the internet.

And we've all been around the block enough times to know that the only time their platform of reducing spending occurs when Democrats hold the White House.
Click to expand...

You're absolutely right. I've said it many times on JPP. The Republicans' only position is pissing off liberals. It's literally the only thing they stand for. And their idiot supporters and their overlords on FoKKKs eat it up.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Merely responding proves you care, son.

Disagreed. You haven't even tried much less encouraged people to report Saltydancing for a rule 14 violation. The mods don't act unless there's a complaint.

As the rule states, the first step of action is to delete the posts. It's hard to track those, but I've seen it. Second is a temp or permban. The latter usually due to multiple warnings via PM without response or, worse, a "Fuck YOU!" in response. LOL
Click to expand...

Unfortunately sounds like a page out of Talib's "death to the infidels" as HA MAS ! killing Palestinians at a hospital & those burning US Constitution Bill of Rights "it's just a God damn piece of paper" Bush's Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom drug trafficking enforcement Islam health care plan of Christain Nation SCOTUS Fourth Reich July 9/11 George Washington University Hospital Washington, D.C. born USA citizens are Islam patriot act; but so goes those suicidal super ego sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming condescending arrogance of their national religion.....
 
Doc Dutch said:
Nice try attempting to deflect away from the Democratic vote on the Iraq Resolution. Soooo....are you claiming they were stupid or just weak?

Yes, I remember Freedom Fries and American flags made in China....just like Trump's MAGA hats. LOL
Click to expand...
The issue is dirty hands, and how you've changed your criteria over the years.

Of course, 20 years is a long time.
 
Diesel said:
Kerry supported the resolution, but he didn't support the war. He was clear about that, and by the 2004 election, we all knew that Cheney and Bush had started an unjustified war.
Click to expand...
The Right loves to defend their votes for a criminal Cheney by stating that Dems. voted to go to war.

That's a lie.

That aside, it's easy to forget that 9/11 bloodlust still existed in '02 when Bushco was pushing lies and fabricated intelligence. The nation wasn't immune to Fox News propaganda back then, and they aided greatly in slandering anyone who spoke out against Bush's war of aggression.

There were failed legal challenges to Bush's illegal invasion in '03
 
Diesel said:
You're absolutely right. I've said it many times on JPP. The Republicans' only position is pissing off liberals. It's literally the only thing they stand for. And their idiot supporters and their overlords on FoKKKs eat it up.
Click to expand...
Some elderly extended family Republicans cited trump 'owning the Libs' as their favorite quality in the flaccid orange moron.

That's kind of sad.

It was a thing of beauty when Biden destroyed trump in '20.

The aforementioned aged loons went into a depression.
 
Diesel said:
Kerry supported the resolution, but he didn't support the war. He was clear about that, and by the 2004 election, we all knew that Cheney and Bush had started an unjustified war.
Click to expand...
Sure, after it turned out to be a colossal mistake and he was running for President he famously said "I was for the Iraq War before I was against it".

 
Althea said:
Some elderly extended family Republicans cited trump 'owning the Libs' as their favorite quality in the flaccid orange moron.

That's kind of sad.

It was a thing of beauty when Biden destroyed trump in '20.

The aforementioned aged loons went into a depression.
Click to expand...

My MAGA relatives went full blown insane. Election fraud. Biden's a pedophile. He was paid off by foreign governments. The whole thing. I intentionally severed many extended family relationships. I tried to save them for years, but the MAGA morons do not deserve to associate with me.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Sure, after it turned out to be a colossal mistake and he was running for President he famously said "I was for the Iraq War before I was against it".

Click to expand...

Kerry was against the war before the 2004 election. Your and Cheney's hands are far dirtier than Kerry's.
 
Diesel said:
Kerry was against the war before the 2004 election. Your and Cheney's hands are far dirtier than Kerry's.
Click to expand...

You're free to that opinion, but unlike John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and 27 other Democrat Senators, not to mention 81 Democrats in the House, I didn't have a vote.

FWIW, I was against the Iraq war. I had no problem with bombing Saddam's "palaces", but there was no fucking way we'd be in and out like the Bush administration was claiming. We'd win the war and lose the peace through occupation. It was an untenable situation and, therefore, not worth American blood.
 
Doc Dutch said:
You're free to that opinion, but unlike John Kerry, Hillary Clinton and 27 other Democrat Senators, not to mention 81 Democrats in the House, I didn't have a vote.

FWIW, I was against the Iraq war. I had no problem with bombing Saddam's "palaces", but there was no fucking way we'd be in and out like the Bush administration was claiming. We'd win the war and lose the peace through occupation. It was an untenable situation and, therefore, not worth American blood.
Click to expand...

A vote for the resolution was not a vote for the war. Of course, there was a perception at that time that anything other than a blank check to Cheney's evil plans was unpatriotic.
 
Diesel said:
A vote for the resolution was not a vote for the war. Of course, there was a perception at that time that anything other than a blank check to Cheney's evil plans was unpatriotic.
Click to expand...
The Democrats, along with the Republicans of course, opened the door to war. They punted to Bush to make the call. Denying their hands are dirty is to claim they were either stupid or cowardly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autho...ilitary_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, informally known as the Iraq Resolution, is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No. 107-243, authorizing the use of the United States Armed Forces against Saddam Hussein's Iraq government in what would be known as Operation Iraqi Freedom.
 
Doc Dutch said:
The Democrats, along with the Republicans of course, opened the door to war. They punted to Bush to make the call. Denying their hands are dirty is to claim they were either stupid or cowardly.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autho...ilitary_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002, informally known as the Iraq Resolution, is a joint resolution passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law No. 107-243, authorizing the use of the United States Armed Forces against Saddam Hussein's Iraq government in what would be known as Operation Iraqi Freedom.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the people who reelected Bush after his fuckery had been exposed. Your "both sides" argument does not persuade.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top