Senate super majority in serious jeopardy

Superfreak said:
By the way... you asked for the source of HIS claim. I provided you with one.

But your normal...'must defend Dems' hackery went into high gear.

By the way... I fully expect you to call out anyone from the left who posts links to articles that don't have all the sources identified. Otherwise it would simply confirm your supreme Hack title.
Click to expand...


First, I asked Chap for his source, not you. Second, it isn't an article, it's an op-ed. Third, it isn't that the op-ed doesn't identify every source, it doesn't identify a single source at all to support the claim. Fourth, I'm not the board police. I call out what I want to call out and you can do the same. Fifth, I suppose you will gladly accept any uncorroborated, unsourced left-wing bullshit if it appears somewhere on the internet, otherwise it would simply confirm your Supreme Hack title.
 
Chapdog said:
Dont forget how they changed the rules about senate replacement when romney got elected as governor so he couldnt appoint who he wanted... then changed them again when Patrick was governor back to how it was.

The people in this state for the past year up until Kennedy's death (haven't heard since then) have been reading daily in the local newspapers floated tax increase ideas to the point that even the staunch union democrats have a very sour taste in there mouths.

So read any poll you want to read and ask for any source you want.. Bottom line is word on the street here is Brown is going to do well on Tuesday.
Click to expand...
That would be awesome.
 
NigelTufnel said:
First, I asked Chap for his source, not you. Second, it isn't an article, it's an op-ed. Third, it isn't that the op-ed doesn't identify every source, it doesn't identify a single source at all to support the claim. Fourth, I'm not the board police. I call out what I want to call out and you can do the same. Fifth, I suppose you will gladly accept any uncorroborated, unsourced left-wing bullshit if it appears somewhere on the internet, otherwise it would simply confirm your Supreme Hack title.
Click to expand...
The op-ed Identifies a specific person, what they said, how they said it, and what they avoided and extrapolates. They definitely speak about a source.
 
Superfreak said:
Desh... this AGAIN has nothing to do with this thread. Why are you posting this on here?

I understand your desire to show that the Democrat led Congress has presided over a failing economy for the past three years and that their policies are detrimental to the nation. But still, this thread is about the MA election... not the jobs situation.
Click to expand...

Im going to disagree with you.. This is not a MA election this is a national election and a testament to Obama and the Dems policies thus far. tsunami potential.
 
Chapdog said:
Dont forget how they changed the rules about senate replacement when romney got elected as governor so he couldnt appoint who he wanted... then changed them again when Patrick was governor back to how it was.

The people in this state for the past year up until Kennedy's death (haven't heard since then) have been reading daily in the local newspapers floated tax increase ideas to the point that even the staunch union democrats have a very sour taste in there mouths.

So read any poll you want to read and ask for any source you want.. Bottom line is word on the street here is Brown is going to do well on Tuesday.
Click to expand...

Didn't the latest poll have Coakley up by 15?
 
NigelTufnel said:
First, I asked Chap for his source, not you. Second, it isn't an article, it's an op-ed. Third, it isn't that the op-ed doesn't identify every source, it doesn't identify a single source at all to support the claim. Fourth, I'm not the board police. I call out what I want to call out and you can do the same. Fifth, I suppose you will gladly accept any uncorroborated, unsourced left-wing bullshit if it appears somewhere on the internet, otherwise it would simply confirm your Supreme Hack title.
Click to expand...

First dipshit... this is a message board... if we were all restricted to only interjecting information when asked for... then what the fuck are you interjecting anything for? I don't recall Chap asking for YOUR comments. Hack.

Second, I did not state it was an article you fucking moron. You asked for a SOURCE of his comments. I provided one you dipshit hack.

Third, I realize it did not source the anonymous person. That is very common in today's 'reporting'. Again, I expect you to call out every Dem that uses a Huffpo/moveon etc... piece that uses anonymous sources when dealing with sensitive info like this. Because we all know these sources are going to continue providing inside info on politicians if they are identified. Their jobs wouldn't be in jeopardy or anything

Fourth... yes I know you are not the police. You are simply a HACK who cannot help by try to attack anything and everything that may disparage your dear leaders.

Fifth... yes, you are a Hack.
 
here are the polls i know about.. and dates so you can see the big shift. should have been a landslide for her.

Rasmussen Reports 1/11 - 1/11 Coakley +2
PPP (D) 1/7 - 1/9 Brown +1
Rasmussen Reports 1/4 - 1/4 Coakley +9
Boston Globe 1/2 - 1/6 Coakley +17
Suffolk 11/4 - 11/8 Coakley +31
Western NE College 10/18 - 10/22 Coakley +26
Suffolk 9/12 - 9/15 Coakley +30
 
Chapdog said:
Im going to disagree with you.. This is not a MA election this is a national election and a testament to Obama and the Dems policies thus far. tsunami potential.
Click to expand...

A fair point.

Though I don't think it has as much to do with jobs as it is a referendum on health care (from the national perspective).

That said... Desh has been clear in pointing out the Democrats failed policies of the past three years in Congress being detrimental to the jobs market.
 
Chapdog said:
here are the polls i know about.. and dates so you can see the big shift. should have been a landslide for her.

Rasmussen Reports 1/11 - 1/11 Coakley +2
PPP (D) 1/7 - 1/9 Brown +1
Rasmussen Reports 1/4 - 1/4 Coakley +9
Boston Globe 1/2 - 1/6 Coakley +17
Suffolk 11/4 - 11/8 Coakley +31
Western NE College 10/18 - 10/22 Coakley +26
Suffolk 9/12 - 9/15 Coakley +30
Click to expand...

It might still be a landslide; regardless, I think there is little doubt she'll win.
 
I think people need a tax cut.. Should be tax cut up to 250K.. Would stimulate the economy big time. No more of the rich tax cuts tho. Also we should raise the tax on the rich back to 50% or so over 2M. Fuck thoes people who make 2M a year.
 
Chapdog said:
Im going to disagree with you.. This is not a MA election this is a national election and a testament to Obama and the Dems policies thus far. tsunami potential.
Click to expand...


The odd thing about that, Chap, is that the latest Rasmussen poll on this race which has Coakley up by 2 (down from 9 previously) shows Obama with a 57% approval rating and support for the Healthcare Bill at 52% support.

It's odd. I think it has more to do with Deval Patrick (59% disapproval rating) and local Democrats than national politics.
 
Onceler said:
It might still be a landslide; regardless, I think there is little doubt she'll win.
Click to expand...

LMAO...

While it could indeed still be a landslide in a state that leans hard in favor of Dems (thanks Capt obvious)... to suggest that there is 'little doubt she will win' is kind of silly.

If there was little doubt...

1) Then why did they bring in Clinton last minute to campaign for her

2) Why are the most recent polls showing it is within the margin of error

3) Why are they appearing to hit the panic button?
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO...

While it could indeed still be a landslide in a state that leans hard in favor of Dems (thanks Capt obvious)... to suggest that there is 'little doubt she will win' is kind of silly.

If there was little doubt...

1) Then why did they bring in Clinton last minute to campaign for her

2) Why are the most recent polls showing it is within the margin of error

3) Why are they appearing to hit the panic button?
Click to expand...


Ah - we'll see. You're clearly all wired up this morning, so it doesn't really make sense to try to reason with you.

It's MA, and they're replacing Kennedy; I'd put money on something at least close to a double digit win...
 
Superfreak said:
LMAO...

While it could indeed still be a landslide in a state that leans hard in favor of Dems (thanks Capt obvious)... to suggest that there is 'little doubt she will win' is kind of silly.

If there was little doubt...

1) Then why did they bring in Clinton last minute to campaign for her

2) Why are the most recent polls showing it is within the margin of error

3) Why are they appearing to hit the panic button?
Click to expand...



To remove that little doubt and make it a lock in an important election with national consequences where its the only election occurring at this time and all resources can easily be concentrated on it? Maybe?
 
NigelTufnel said:
The odd thing about that, Chap, is that the latest Rasmussen poll on this race which has Coakley up by 2 (down from 9 previously) shows Obama with a 57% approval rating and support for the Healthcare Bill at 52% support.

It's odd. I think it has more to do with Deval Patrick (59% disapproval rating) and local Democrats than national politics.
Click to expand...

You could be right on that. As I said Deval and the MA Senete has gone overboard with the tax talk. For awhile it was every singe week a new tax increase floated. Lets add 20cents to gas, lets increase tolls, lets increase sales tax, lets increase income tax, lets increase commuter train costs, lets increase sin tax.. was relentless and everyone was bitching about it. I really think they did it like a strategy to feel out the people to see which one would cause the least uprising.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top