55 Chinese sailors are feared dead after nuclear submarine 'gets caught in a trap int

ExpressLane

Verified User
55 Chinese sailors are feared dead after nuclear submarine 'gets caught in a trap intended to snare British and US vessels in the Yellow Sea'

Fifty-five Chinese sailors are feared dead after their nuclear submarine apparently got caught in a trap intended to ensnare British sub-surface vessels in the Yellow Sea.

According to a secret UK report the seamen died following a catastrophic failure of the submarine's oxygen systems which poisoned the crew.

The captain of the Chinese PLA Navy submarine '093-417' is understood to be among the deceased, as were 21 other officers.

Officially, China has denied the incident took place. It also appears Beijing refused to request international assistance for its stricken submarine.

The UK report into the fatal mission reads: 'Intelligence reports that on 21st of August there was an onboard accident whilst carrying out a mission in the Yellow Sea.

'Incident happened at 08.12 local resulting in the death of 55 crew members: 22 officers, 7 officer cadets, 9 petty officers, 17 sailors. Dead include the captain Colonel Xue Yong-Peng.

'Our understanding is death caused by hypoxia due to a system fault on the submarine. The submarine hit a chain and anchor obstacle used by the Chinese Navy to trap US and allied submarines.

'This resulted in systems failures that took six hours to repair and surface the vessel. The onboard oxygen system poisoned the crew after a catastrophic failure.'.....

As yet there is no independent confirmation of the suspected loss of the Chinese submarine in the public domain.

Beijing has dismissed open source speculation about the incident as 'completely false' while Taiwan has also denied internet reports.

Mail Plus approached the Royal Navy to discuss the details contained in the UK report but official sources declined to comment or offer guidance.

The UK report, which is based on defence intelligence, is held at a high classification.

A British submariner offered this explanation: 'It is plausible that this occurred and I doubt the Chinese would have asked for international support for obvious reasons.....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12589429/chinese-sailors-trap-yellow-sea.html

====================== ==========

:whoa: Caught in their own trap. I wonder if this is an accurate report.
 
American and UK intel claimed for years that Trump was a Russian stooge ....to say that they are unreliable is an understatement.
 
American and UK intel claimed for years that Trump was a Russian stooge ....to say that they are unreliable is an understatement.

They noted that Trump was gullible, wanted to show off and was easy to manipulate. He was a perfect person to get info from. He is mentally and emotionally very immature. Putin looks for people like that.
Of course, when Trump was in office, he met several times with Putin. We had no translators, recorders, or other people allowed in. Gee, I wonder why not?
 
Last edited:
Just six weeks ago there was a report that the Chinese had lost a sub....which turned out to be false:

https://www.newsweek.com/china-submarine-crash-taiwan-strait-miitary-drills-1821787

It was not proven to be false. Both stories are about a class 93 sub.

Your article is more likely confirmation than debunkation.

You're old enough to remember the Howard Hughes manganese nodule sea floor mining project. That ended up being a CIA cover story to recover a soviet sub.
 
They noted that Trump was gullible, wanted to show off and was easy to manipulate. He was a perfect person to get info from. He is mentally and emotionally very immature . Putin looks for people like that.
Of course when Trump was sin office, he met several times with Putin. We had no translators, recorders, or other people allowed in. Gee, I wonder why not?

LIAR
 
55 Chinese sailors are feared dead after nuclear submarine 'gets caught in a trap intended to snare British and US vessels in the Yellow Sea'

....

A British submariner offered this explanation: 'It is plausible that this occurred and I doubt the Chinese would have asked for international support for obvious reasons.....

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12589429/chinese-sailors-trap-yellow-sea.html

====================== ==========

:whoa: Caught in their own trap. I wonder if this is an accurate report.

IIrony

Was the trap so secret that the Chinese didn't tell their own sub captains? LOL
 
It sure looks like this is yet another false report....directly from UK Intel which now routinely lies their asses off just as the Americans do.
 
And the Chinese never lie.

If this was real Western Intel would be yakking, showing evidence. Yes I know that the CIA program in China was long ago gutted by the CCP and the CIA has not been able to rebuild it, but they would have signal intel, and they would be blabbing to Regime Media.
 
It appears that we now have two separate claims of China losing subs that prove to be false in just two months, which indicates a ongoing psyops program by the West.
 
It appears that we now have two separate claims of China losing subs that prove to be false in just two months, which indicates a ongoing psyops program by the West.
^^^
Gets secret messages from Putin in his sleep.
 
They noted that Trump was gullible, wanted to show off and was easy to manipulate. He was a perfect person to get info from. He is mentally and emotionally very immature . Putin looks for people like that.
Of course when Trump was sin office, he met several times with Putin. We had no translators, recorders, or other people allowed in. Gee, I wonder why not?
And during the election he lied about still trying to get a trump Tower in Moscow.
 
If this was real Western Intel would be yakking, showing evidence. Yes I know that the CIA program in China was long ago gutted by the CCP and the CIA has not been able to rebuild it, but they would have signal intel, and they would be blabbing to Regime Media.
I suspect we know from signals intelligence.
 
Yes. You are. In Helsinki he only had a translator with no transcript leaving the room.

Not according to Nordberg's post which I was responding to, you fucking liar.

"We had no translators"
 
Apparently the report of 6 weeks ago is the same report as now, the only change is that UK intel which lies constantly is claiming with no evidence presented that it happened.
 
This is a good place to mention that the USS Connecticut, which hit an obstacle on the sea floor in the same general area at the end of 2021 due to complete command breakdown, is not expected back in the fleet till 2026 at the earliest, due to complete breakdown of the Navys maintenance system. The Navy scraped too much drydock capacity after the fall of the Soviet Union, and never headed warnings that it was making a mistake.

USS Connecticut is so expensive that only three of this type were ever built.
 
Back
Top