Rep. Jamaal Bowman pulls fire alarm ahead of vote to pass short-term funding bill

[Matt Dillon]

Show me where I said he suspended the constitution.

I certainly do not suggest you vote for Democrats, I've told you why I would never vote for that lot. I also said their bad actions make it so I won't vote for them, not so I will vote for Trump. I won't vote for Trump, he is not the party, there are plenty of choices I would vote for in the republican party and I suggest you and I do that rather than "settle" for someone who believes they are more important than the rules in the Constitution...

Here is what Trump said, where he believes that he is so important that the rules should all be terminated including "even those found in the Constitution"...

Well, you know, Big Tech and the FBI and the MSM put all their weight on the scales of that election, and they really didn't have the right to, and never will.

That was a coup.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Bowman was principal of a school for 10 years, there's no way in hell he doesn't know what a Fire Alarm is.

They drill them on that, you know. Bi-annually I think..

I could ask a friend that's a teacher.

 

[domer76]

Well, you know, Big Tech and the FBI and the MSM put all their weight on the scales of that election, and they really didn't have the right to, and never will.

That was a coup.

Did you find that fraud hiding with the Easter Bunny?

 

[Earl]

Well, you know, Big Tech and the FBI and the MSM put all their weight on the scales of that election, and they really didn't have the right to, and never will.

That was a coup.

Indeed.

 

[Lionfish]

 

[Yakuda]

The right’s hero, Scalia, said guns can be controlled. Time, place, manufacture, sale, type.

Write SCOTUS with your expert opinion. I’m sure they’ll give it all the consideration it deserves.

Probably the same consideration I give your opinion.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yet you answered the entire post in two separate quote boxes. Sounds like someone is lying.

Once again we must return to the topic of your inability to read English for comprehension. As an argument/assertion, your comment is being ignored. To best teach you what is wrong with your assertion, I elected to divide your quote into two parts.

You're welcome.

By explaining something that is so obvious ...

Unfortunately, without the omitted information that I graciously provided, your point was trivial and completely ambiguous. You could have written "air is good" and similarly left your audience wondering what you really meant or if you are simply wasting bandwidth.

As a courtesy to you and to this board, I provided the information needed to complete the thought and to remove the tanker of ambiguity you spilled into the thread.

it didn't need explaining,

Yes, it absolutely needed to be specified because one of the repeated subthreads involved many assertions that the Constitution could be amended by other means, e.g. the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, you did not specify; you retained full ambiguity. I corrected that for you.

You're most welcome.

your post IMPLIES that I was saying Constitutional procedures need not be followed.

Nope. You left that interpretation open for your audience by posting a completely ambiguous assertion. I corrected that for you.

You're welcome.

Now you admit that you didn't "teach me" anything.

Only if you have been too stupid to learn anything.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Once again we must return to the topic of your inability to read English for comprehension. As an argument/assertion, your comment is being ignored. To best teach you what is wrong with your assertion, I elected to divide your quote into two parts. ...

...Only if you have been too stupid to learn anything.

Mantra 57 Repetitive and demented behavior

Mantra 1a.

Mantra 4a.

One of the "miscellaneous" documents on that site is Into the Night's mantra list.

 

[Nomad]

Once again we must return to the topic of your inability to read English for comprehension. As an argument/assertion, your comment is being ignored. To best teach you what is wrong with your assertion, I elected to divide your quote into two parts.

You're welcome.

Unfortunately, without the omitted information that I graciously provided, your point was trivial and completely ambiguous. You could have written "air is good" and similarly left your audience wondering what you really meant or if you are simply wasting bandwidth.

As a courtesy to you and to this board, I provided the information needed to complete the thought and to remove the tanker of ambiguity you spilled into the thread.

Yes, it absolutely needed to be specified because one of the repeated subthreads involved many assertions that the Constitution could be amended by other means, e.g. the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, you did not specify; you retained full ambiguity. I corrected that for you.

You're most welcome.

Nope. You left that interpretation open for your audience by posting a completely ambiguous assertion. I corrected that for you.

You're welcome.

Only if you have been too stupid to learn anything.

My only error was in assuming that you and your fellow MAGAdiots were intelligent and perceptive enough to know those basic, high school civics facts that you so pompously and self importantly spouted for us.

My apologies.

 

[Into the Night]

My only error was in assuming that you and your fellow MAGAdiots were intelligent and perceptive enough to know those basic, high school civics facts that you so pompously and self importantly spouted for us.

My apologies.

...annnnnd back to your meaningless insults and buzzwords.
Mantra 1c.

 

[IBDaMann]

My only error was in assuming that you ...

... knew how to properly interpret your meaningless virtue-signaling.

Rarely do you have any clue what you're talking about so no, there is no reason anyone should ever assume that you do. Of course, you bitch and whine and piss and moan and cry like a baby whenever anyone helps you out because it highlights the vast extent to which you need help. Nonetheless, I didn't draw attention to the fact that you are as stupid as fuck; no, I simply provided the assistance necessary and then quietly went about my business. I didn't throw a "fuck you" in your direction because I'm on your side. I'm just here to help you out, because helping those who can't help themselves is what I'm all about.

Humbly and quietly working from behind the scenes to make the world a better place is how I roll. It's just the kind of guy I am.

 

[QP!]

You posted a transcript not extortion. What's the extortion part? You didn't read it did you?

From YOUR link

"The memo released by the White House Wednesday includes this cautionary language: "CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty Officers and NSC policy staff assigned to listen and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place.""

Hey dimwit.

the extortion part is me reading the transcript and saying my opinion on it and then saying to you 'prove my opinion it is extortion wrong'.


that is the proof you use up thread and all the time. Not that you have to prove your claim but that others need to prove you wrong when you offer your stupid opinions.


So yes i proved Trump extorted as you cannot prove my opinion wrong.

 

[Nomad]

... knew how to properly interpret your meaningless virtue-signaling.

Rarely do you have any clue what you're talking about so no, there is no reason anyone should ever assume that you do. Of course, you bitch and whine and piss and moan and cry like a baby whenever anyone helps you out because it highlights the vast extent to which you need help. Nonetheless, I didn't draw attention to the fact that you are as stupid as fuck; no, I simply provided the assistance necessary and then quietly went about my business. I didn't throw a "fuck you" in your direction because I'm on your side. I'm just here to help you out, because helping those who can't help themselves is what I'm all about.

Humbly and quietly working from behind the scenes to make the world a better place is how I roll. It's just the kind of guy I am.

That's rich.

Some bloviating idiot who can't stop talking about herself is accusing another of virtue signaling.

Maybe now you can tell me which virtues you think I signaled, and how, where and when I did so.

More to the point, do you actually even understand the term and what it means?

I will say that you are correct about one thing, though.

It's true you didn't draw any attention to anyone being as stupid as fuck.

Other than yourself, that is.

You really, truly did draw attention to that.

Bigly.

 

[Yakuda]

Hey dimwit.

the extortion part is me reading the transcript and saying my opinion on it and then saying to you 'prove my opinion it is extortion wrong'.


that is the proof you use up thread and all the time. Not that you have to prove your claim but that others need to prove you wrong when you offer your stupid opinions.


So yes i proved Trump extorted as you cannot prove my opinion wrong.

It's not a verbatim transcript but good try

Point to the extortion part.

 

[QP!]

It's not a verbatim transcript but good try

Point to the extortion part.

I don't have to.

I just have to tell you 'I read it as extortion... prove me wrong' and that is my proof.

The same proof you use over and over, when asked for proof and you just say 'prove me wrong'.

Trump IS guilty of extortion, prove me wrong.

 

[Yakuda]

I don't have to.

I just have to tell you 'I read it as extortion... prove me wrong' and that is my proof.

The same proof you use over and over, when asked for proof and you just say 'prove me wrong'.

Trump IS guilty of extortion, prove me wrong.

So in other words no evidence of extortion. Thanks.

 

[QP!]

So in other words no evidence of extortion. Thanks.

I gave proof you nut bar.

Prove me wrong.

 

[IBDaMann]

Maybe now you can tell me which virtues you think I signaled

Sure. You signal that the Constitution can just be conveniently modified by the Federal government as needed.

... and how, where and when I did so.

You did so via implication, which is why you omitted all specificity that others could otherwise call out as an error on your part.

I will say that you are correct about one thing, though.

I'm correct about almost everything whereas leftists are incorrect about almost everything.

As a sidenote, I noted your attempt at humor. To help you save face, I recommend we both officially deny it ever happened, i.e. "What attempt at humor?"

Have a great day.

 

[IBDaMann]

I gave proof you nut bar. Prove me wrong.

As a typical leftist, you don't know the meaning of the words and phrases you regurgitate. You didn't give any proof. You made an unfalsifiable statement. Then you asked that your unfalsifiable statement be falsified.

Once again, you are demonstrating that you are brighter than black ink.

 

[LurchAddams]

It appears he did. What's not clear is why he did. I doubt the MAGAt theory that he was being an insurrectionist and seeking to disrupt an official proceeding....even though it's funny that they confess that's exactly what the Insurrectionists did on 1/6. LOL

I know, I'm trolling - you know - like when the trumptards claim 1/6 was a guided tour by the FBI and Pelosi was responsible for security.