California raising taxes on guns and ammunition

Can’t help you, stupid fuck.

The reality is that poll taxes are unconstitutional. Taxes on arms are not.

Now, run off and cry about it.

is there anything you don't need the government to tell you about?

that must mean you firmly believe there is no federal right to abortion, right???
 
Can’t help you, stupid fuck.

The reality is that poll taxes are unconstitutional. Taxes on arms are not.

Now, run off and cry about it.

I'm not crying about bitch boy the point is you cunts only make it easier for criminals to get guns. I wouldn't mind so much if the shit you cockroaches proposed actually didn't you claim they would do but they never do. Like all things leftists instead of punishing the bad guys you abuse law abiding citizens. What a happy bunch of terrorists you are.
 
is there anything you don't need the government to tell you about?

that must mean you firmly believe there is no federal right to abortion, right???

LOL

Another pitiful attempt at diversion. Let’s recap for the ignorant.

Poll taxes are unconstitutional. Taxes on arms are not.

Next
 
I'm not crying about bitch boy the point is you cunts only make it easier for criminals to get guns. I wouldn't mind so much if the shit you cockroaches proposed actually didn't you claim they would do but they never do. Like all things leftists instead of punishing the bad guys you abuse law abiding citizens. What a happy bunch of terrorists you are.

For the life of me, bitch, I just can’t see how this tax makes it easier for criminals to get guns. Why don’t you impart your wisdom?
 
LOL

Another pitiful attempt at diversion. Let’s recap for the ignorant.

Poll taxes are unconstitutional. Taxes on arms are not.

Next

we get it.....you're not capable of comprehending the actual words of the Constitution and you need people in black robes to tell you what words mean because you're dumber than a box of fucking rocks.
 
we get it.....you're not capable of comprehending the actual words of the Constitution and you need people in black robes to tell you what words mean because you're dumber than a box of fucking rocks.

Go ahead and quote the EXACT WORDS of the Constitution that prohibit taxes on arms, “vehicles cannot be necessary”.

Like it or not, bitch, the Constitution DOES create that judicial branch. Your failure to recognize that is merely more proof of your terminal ignorance.
 
For the life of me, bitch, I just can’t see how this tax makes it easier for criminals to get guns. Why don’t you impart your wisdom?

Oh course you can't see it because you're a retarded cunt. The point of the tax by this asshole isn't meant to raise money to protect children it's meant to make the legal purchase of guns cost prohibitive. People will then look elsewhere to purchase guns and criminals were already doing that
 
Go ahead and quote the EXACT WORDS of the Constitution that prohibit taxes on arms, “vehicles cannot be necessary”.

Like it or not, bitch, the Constitution DOES create that judicial branch. Your failure to recognize that is merely more proof of your terminal ignorance.

this is the problem with idiot leftists, like yourself. YOU don't get to pick and choose the parts of the Constitution you want to keep and discard the parts you don't like. poll taxes are unconstitutional, therefore rights cannot be taxed. but you are a coward who is afraid of people with guns, so you want taxes on guns and ammo. I'm sure you'd support the 1,000 % tax proposed by a democrat, making the right to keep and bear too expensive for most black people, wouldn't you, racist?

willfully ignoring your own stupidity, needing that judicial branch to tell you what YOUR Constitution means, is the mark of a braindead moron.
 
I try to have a two year supple of ammo on hand because ammo is hard to find sometimes

The lefts ability to "control" gun owners will inevitably result in higher taxes in some states resulting in great buying opportunities from "free" states.
I began handloading my ammunition while I was shooting competitively back in the 1990's. Even then we experienced disruptions in our supplies.
Most of us made hay while the sun was shining and I am currently using primers that I bought 30 years ago. I can still load a box of 38sp. or 9mm for about $6.50/bx.
Their attempts, as all the rest of their bullshit, will not work.

The solution is easy, leftie democrat run cities and states need to purge themselves of the dozens upon dozens of Soros appointed DA's and governors.
Then,
Mandatory, no bail, no plea bargain, harsh prison time for any crime committed with a gun.

I highly doubt any of the whiney screeching lefties here will even comment on this all too easy solution to the crime that is crippling our cities.


BUT TRUMP!
 
Oh course you can't see it because you're a retarded cunt. The point of the tax by this asshole isn't meant to raise money to protect children it's meant to make the legal purchase of guns cost prohibitive. People will then look elsewhere to purchase guns and criminals were already doing that

Just as I thought. You can’t answer thar simple question to prove your point.
 
Poor anchovies, If you are of the belief that this will stop or even slow anyone from obtaining ammunition, you are dreaming. Any avid shooter has at least a five year supply of ammunition already on hand. I always laugh when the NEWZ reports that someone has a large cache of ammo and they show all the FBI guys standing around and pointing at a cardboard box with 250 rounds. I have customers that shoot 500 rounds per session.

A little lesson for you,


The PITTMAN-ROBERTSON Act of 1937 was endorsed by outdoorsmen because it was used to protect and ensure hunting and fishing habitats.

The Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937, most often referred to as the Pittman–Robertson Act for its sponsors, Nevada Senator Key Pittman and Virginia Congressman Absalom Willis Robertson, is an act that imposes an 11% tax on firearms, ammunition, and archery equipment and distributes the proceeds to state governments for wildlife projects.

The act was signed by Franklin D. Roosevelt on September 2, 1937, and became effective on July 1 of the following year. It has been amended many times, with several of the major amendments taking place during the 1970s and the most recent in 2000. Prior to the creation of the Pittman–Robertson Act, many species of wildlife were driven to or near extinction by commercial/market hunting pressure and/or habitat degradation from humans. The act created an excise tax that provides funds to each state to manage such animals and their habitats. Notable species that have come back from the brink since the implementation of this act include white-tailed deer, wild turkeys, and wood ducks.

As for an additional 10% going to arm school staff, I fully support this idea as it will surely help.

Ah, so all the Dylan Roofs, Payton Gendrons and alike are now “avid shooters?” Stephen Paddock might have been, but doubt the others were, and someone firing thru 500 rounds of ammunition at a time needs to get a life

And your Act of 1937 has nothing to do with anything
 
this is the problem with idiot leftists, like yourself. YOU don't get to pick and choose the parts of the Constitution you want to keep and discard the parts you don't like. poll taxes are unconstitutional, therefore rights cannot be taxed. but you are a coward who is afraid of people with guns, so you want taxes on guns and ammo. I'm sure you'd support the 1,000 % tax proposed by a democrat, making the right to keep and bear too expensive for most black people, wouldn't you, racist?

willfully ignoring your own stupidity, needing that judicial branch to tell you what YOUR Constitution means, is the mark of a braindead moron.

Yep, once again, just as I thought. You can’t answer the question because that provision doesn’t exist.

You continue to prove your ignorance of the Constitution. THREE branches, idiot. One being judicial.
 
True but some rights you want taxed but not others.

To use the old gun huggers logic, show us in the Constitution where it says ammunition can’t be taxed? The US Government has been doing it since 1913, and even Thomas’s idiotic interpretation of history couldn’t touch that one
 
I'm not crying about bitch boy the point is you cunts only make it easier for criminals to get guns. I wouldn't mind so much if the shit you cockroaches proposed actually didn't you claim they would do but they never do. Like all things leftists instead of punishing the bad guys you abuse law abiding citizens. What a happy bunch of terrorists you are.

Bullshit, tired of the “law biding citizen,” nearly every mass shooter was a “law biding citizen,” including Stephen Padock, until the very second they pulled the trigger, it is a bogus argument

And criminals would have a harder time getting guns if we stopped the Iron Pipeline, eliminated private sales, make interstate purchases more stricter, and instituted real gun regulation
 
To use the old gun huggers logic, show us in the Constitution where it says ammunition can’t be taxed? The US Government has been doing it since 1913, and even Thomas’s idiotic interpretation of history couldn’t touch that one

I dont care about the tax because sadly the govt has the power of taxation. That's the govts weapon of choice. My problem is the pretending. Gov gruesome doesnt give a shit about children being shot in school as this does nothing to prevent shootings. What it does do however is exactly what they want it to do but don't have the fucking stones to admit, to make the legal purchase of guns cost prohibitive for law abiding citizens.
 
I dont care about the tax because sadly the govt has the power of taxation. That's the govts weapon of choice. My problem is the pretending. Gov gruesome doesnt give a shit about children being shot in school as this does nothing to prevent shootings. What it does do however is exactly what they want it to do but don't have the fucking stones to admit, to make the legal purchase of guns cost prohibitive for law abiding citizens.

10% makes them cost prohibitive? Really?

Let’s see. In a lifetime, one MAY(at most) need a single handgun and a single box, or even single magazine, of ammo. And 10% makes that impossible?

Bullshit.
 
10% makes them cost prohibitive? Really?

Let’s see. In a lifetime, one MAY(at most) need a single handgun and a single box, or even single magazine, of ammo. And 10% makes that impossible?

Bullshit.

It's not 10% it's an additional 10%.

How much does the average handgun cost? Ammo or magazine? Maybe for some people that does make it impossible for them to exercise their right to gun ownership. If a person has a right should they be able to exercise their right if they choose? Should the qualifications to any right be related to wealth as the Supreme Court stated about voting in their Harper v Virginia State Board of Elections decision?
 
Back
Top