Green celebs join climate activists for a lavish banquet in Versailles.

Taichiliberal said:
I'm interested in YOUR take on the situation, Tommy. Rather that waste time and space playing games, why don't you state for the reading audience in no uncertain terms what is your real complaint here? For all you know, I might agree with you.
Click to expand...

Yeh well don't call me Tommy, Titchy!
 
Last edited:
ezgif-3-7565cc686d-jpg.1384984
 
serendipity said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
I'm interested in YOUR take on the situation, Tommy. Rather that waste time and space playing games, why don't you state for the reading audience in no uncertain terms what is your real complaint here? For all you know, I might agree with you.
Click to expand...



I thought that I had already explained clearly enough already. This was a state visit that had been postponed because of rioting in Paris earlier in the year. I can understand heads of state and politicians attending but what exactly do Mick Jagger, Charlotte Gainsbourg, Hugh Grant and Leonardo diCaprio bring to the table apart from themselves? No doubt Lenny is looking out for his next teenage shag partner.

Yet you people who are always whining about contrails, global warming blah blah don't appear to be in the least bit bothered. It's the same bollox when yet another COP comes around and the skies are full of pontificating pompous pricks and prickettes waffling on and on about nothing. The WEF wants the ordinary Joes and Josephines to fly only every 3 years. Of course none of that would apply to the fat cats though.
Click to expand...


You thought wrong. And since when is it suddenly moral hypocrisy and a crime for successful celebrities to attend or spearhead charity/social policy events, no matter how humble or lavish? They all do it, regardless of political party allegiance. This is documented by the press, main stream and otherwise.

And again, if all the celebs are flying private all the time, they would be hypocritical in attending this event. You've already expressed that sentiment....carrying on about it like you're about to froth at the mouth is a bit redundant.

So if that's all you've got Tommy, I'd say message received, point taken.
 
serendipity said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Why not? That was your original screen name years before you've changed it what, twice now? My, but you are thin skinned!

Later Tommy ...oops, I'm mean Dippy! ;)
Click to expand...

Screw you Titchy Literal.
Click to expand...

Wow...you having a flashback to grade school, Dippy? :laugh:

I mean, throwing a hissy fit because I point to the fact of your changing screen names with the frequency of a cheap ham radio is a bit immature on your part. Oh well, life goes on. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top