Former Capitol Police Lieutenant Says January 6th Riot Was a Setup

Show us on the website any mention of the Speaker of the House. https://www.uscp.gov/the-department

The Sergeant–at–Arms is elected at the beginning of a Congress by the
resolution(8) electing all officers of the House (other than the Speaker). Upon
election, the Sergeant–at–Arms is administered the oath of office(9) by the
Speaker.(10) The Sergeant–at–Arms is subject to removal by the House or
by the Speaker, pursuant to clause 1 of rule II.
(11) If the Office of the Sergeant–at–Arms becomes vacant during a Congress (due to the resignation,(12) removal, death, or incapacity of the Sergeant–at–Arms), the House
will typically fill the vacancy by adopting a new resolution electing an individual to that position.(13) However, the Speaker has the statutory authority(14) to appoint a temporary replacement until the House is ready to elect
a new Sergeant–at–Arms. The oath of office is administered to a new Sergeant–at–Arms upon election or appointment.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2/pdf/GPO-HPREC-PRECEDENTS-V2-3-3-3.pdf

The Sergeant at Arms of the House of Representatives works closely with the U.S. Capitol Police and other intelligence agencies to assess threats to Congress and the Capitol. The Sergeant at Arms also serves on the Capitol Police Board, which oversees security around the Capitol.
The Sergeant at Arms has the same law enforcement authority as the Capitol Police, including the ability to carry firearms. They can also issue subpoenas at the direction of the Senate president or a committee chairman.

The Sergeant at Arms coordinates with the Capitol Police to:
Assess threats to Congress and the Capitol
Conduct security surveys and risk assessments
https://www.google.com/search?q=doe...092j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&bshm=rime/1


Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.

Like Sund, Irving and Stenger have also since resigned their posts.

Sund says he requested assistance six times ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol. Each of those requests was denied or delayed, he says.


As the chief law enforcement officer of the House, the Sergeant at Arms is responsible for security in the House wing of the Capitol, the House office buildings, and on adjacent grounds. Under the direction of the Speaker of the House or other presiding officer, the Sergeant at Arms plays an integral role in maintaining order and decorum in the House chamber.
https://www.everycrsreport.com/repo...direction of the,decorum in the House chamber.
 

You should really give this up and move on, fucking moron. Multiple people have kicked your miserable ass multiple times.

Your attempt at passing blame for the J6 violence to the SAA and Pelosi is laughable. Quit making such a fool of yourself.
 
The fact is the Repubs wanted bomb throwers to get in the middle of the investigation and scream and spout conspiracies. The Dems wanted and got a serious investigation.

:laugh: Pelosi should have let the GOP have their own people on the committee if she wanted to be fair. Obviously she had no interest in being fair. She obviously was not confident in the strength of her case. So Pelosi put a yes man and yes woman. Both of whom are no longer even in Congress.
 
You should really give this up and move on, fucking moron. Multiple people have kicked your miserable ass multiple times.

Your attempt at passing blame for the J6 violence to the SAA and Pelosi is laughable. Quit making such a fool of yourself.
So Pelosi is boss of the guy that denied the capitol police chiefs request for backup from the NG 6 times and you aren't interested? Yeah we know you are a moron you don't have to say more. :rofl2: I bet you can't count past 10 without taking your shoes and socks off. :laugh:
 
So Pelosi is boss of the guy that denied the capitol police chiefs request for backup from the NG 6 times and you aren't interested? Yeah we know you are a moron you don't have to say more. :rofl2: I bet you can't count past 10 without taking your shoes and socks off. :laugh:
^^^
Previously bitched and whined about convicting people before they were convicted in court. :rofl2:

Where is your evidence, ExLax? On Tucker's Twitter page? LOL
 
So Pelosi is boss of the guy that denied the capitol police chiefs request for backup from the NG 6 times and you aren't interested? Yeah we know you are a moron you don't have to say more. :rofl2: I bet you can't count past 10 without taking your shoes and socks off. :laugh:

The J6 response is long over and investigations have been completed and reports issued, stupid fuck. You’re trying to make it into some sort of fucking Benghazi. And looking every bit the fool for doing so.

Read the fucking reports, if you’re so goddam curious. It takes a Google of a few seconds to locate them.

Don’t you stupid fucks know when anything is done and over and time to let it go?
 
The J6 response is long over and investigations have been completed and reports issued, stupid fuck. You’re trying to make it into some sort of fucking Benghazi. And looking every bit the fool for doing so.

Read the fucking reports, if you’re so goddam curious. It takes a Google of a few seconds to locate them.

Don’t you stupid fucks know when anything is done and over and time to let it go?
Reports by a sham committee are useless asswipe. :laugh:
 
Anybody can post a fudge-up video on Youtube; it takes some commonsense and critical thinking to be able to discern facts from fantasy, apparently most Magatards just don't have this ability.
 
Anybody can post a fudge-up video on Youtube; it takes some commonsense and critical thinking to be able to discern facts from fantasy, apparently most Magatards just don't have this ability.

That’s why these MAGA idiots have to use these half-assed videos and memes. Too fucking lame to express their views otherwise.
 
That’s why these MAGA idiots have to use these half-assed videos and memes. Too fucking lame to express their views otherwise.

The poor Magatards just don't have any views based on reality to express, so they're trying to create their own reality.
 
:laugh: Pelosi should have let the GOP have their own people on the committee if she wanted to be fair. Obviously she had no interest in being fair. She obviously was not confident in the strength of her case. So Pelosi put a yes man and yes woman. Both of whom are no longer even in Congress.

She was happy to allow any red who was serious about the investigation. She did not want repub grandstanders who would have made a mess out of it. Yes, 2 Repubs who wanted to really investigate the 1-6 insurrection were primaried. Trump has that power. That says nothing about them or how they performed.
 
:laugh: Pelosi should have let the GOP have their own people on the committee if she wanted to be fair. Obviously she had no interest in being fair. She obviously was not confident in the strength of her case. So Pelosi put a yes man and yes woman. Both of whom are no longer even in Congress.

The initial effort was to form a bipartisan commission to investigate J6, but the Republicans would have nothing to do with that. So, the next effort was to form a bipartisan committee, but you fucktards tried to load it up with conspiracy idiots like Jim “Locker Room” Jordan. So, stupid fuck, you reap what you sow.

You had your chance and blew it. No room to bitch.
 
Back
Top