Fla man shooting neighbor may be self defense WHOOPS

V

volsrock

Verified User
In Druzolowski's interview with police, he said he approached Ford and told him "to get off his property and Brian said something to the effect of, 'mind your business' followed by some cuss words," according to court documents.

Druzolowski said he pointed his gun at Ford, and Ford then allegedly "said something like, 'You are pointing a gun at me, are you going to shoot me?' and moved closer," according to court documents.

Druzolowski said he told Ford to get off his property and Ford kept moving closer, court documents said.

The 78-year-old told police he then said, "'Stop right now or I'll shoot!'"

Druzolowski told investigators "Brian kept walking closer to him and that's when he pulled the trigger for the first time," according to court documents. "He said his firearm holds 6 rounds in the cylinder, but he keeps the first two empty for safety reasons. He stated Brian heard the gun click and continued to advance towards him, so he pulled the trigger the second time. He advised this time the firearm went off and he shot Brian."


Druzolowski "indicated he thought that when he pointed the firearm at Brian, he would just leave his property," and he said "he was afraid Brian would have hurt or killed him if he did not shoot him," the documents said.

Two knives were found by Ford's body, the documents said.



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...n&cvid=1ef892d044ab45a8981f9a50842cef63&ei=10



So the much younger guy was on his property told to get off....and refused cussed at him and kept advancing towards him after being warned to stop more than once and had knifes
 
Last edited:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
 
volsrock said:
In Druzolowski's interview with police, he said he approached Ford and told him "to get off his property and Brian said something to the effect of, 'mind your business' followed by some cuss words," according to court documents.

Druzolowski said he pointed his gun at Ford, and Ford then allegedly "said something like, 'You are pointing a gun at me, are you going to shoot me?' and moved closer," according to court documents.

Druzolowski said he told Ford to get off his property and Ford kept moving closer, court documents said.

The 78-year-old told police he then said, "'Stop right now or I'll shoot!'"

Druzolowski told investigators "Brian kept walking closer to him and that's when he pulled the trigger for the first time," according to court documents. "He said his firearm holds 6 rounds in the cylinder, but he keeps the first two empty for safety reasons. He stated Brian heard the gun click and continued to advance towards him, so he pulled the trigger the second time. He advised this time the firearm went off and he shot Brian."


Druzolowski "indicated he thought that when he pointed the firearm at Brian, he would just leave his property," and he said "he was afraid Brian would have hurt or killed him if he did not shoot him," the documents said.

Two knives were found by Ford's body, the documents said.



https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crim...n&cvid=1ef892d044ab45a8981f9a50842cef63&ei=10



So the much younger guy was on his property told to get off....and refused cussed at him and kept advancing towards him after being warned to stop more than once and had knifes
Click to expand...
He also had a loaded chainsaw
 
Nomad said:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
Click to expand...
An age advantage does the same thing. So liberals want to defund the police but still call on them to resolve problems.
 
Nomad said:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
Click to expand...

Ya, Call the police they MIGHT be there in a matter of a few minutes unless you live in a democrat controlled city and then they won't even bother.
 
Nomad said:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
Click to expand...

i'm going to mostly agree with you on this one. The old mans first mistake was thinking that pointing his gun at a non threatening individual (at that point) was going to be legal, let alone necessary. He should have called the police.

as for the bravado part............no. I know most people like to showcase differences between law enforcement pointing guns at non threats vs. citizens pointing guns at non threats..........giving law enforcement greater leeway (which is brainwashing at it's worst) but equal protection under the laws should allow citizens to use the same actions as law enforcement, short of arresting someone.
 
Nomad said:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
Click to expand...

You have the right to defend your property
 
SmarterthanYou said:
i'm going to mostly agree with you on this one. The old mans first mistake was thinking that pointing his gun at a non threatening individual (at that point) was going to be legal, let alone necessary. He should have called the police.

as for the bravado part............no. I know most people like to showcase differences between law enforcement pointing guns at non threats vs. citizens pointing guns at non threats..........giving law enforcement greater leeway (which is brainwashing at it's worst) but equal protection under the laws should allow citizens to use the same actions as law enforcement, short of arresting someone.
Click to expand...

You dont know their past...Ever seen the show Fear Thy Neighbor?

You have a right to carry a gun on your own property ...this guy may have know his neighbor could get violent and has in the past and the police didnt do a damn thing


If cops know before hand a person can turn violent...bet your ass they will have guns pointed


This guy was on his land with weapons
 
Nomad said:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
Click to expand...

The gun didn't create the violent situation, the dickhead who was trespassing and not doing as the property owner asked is what created the violent situation. I'm not sure why you people insist on excusing shitty behavior.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
i'm going to mostly agree with you on this one. The old mans first mistake was thinking that pointing his gun at a non threatening individual (at that point) was going to be legal, let alone necessary. He should have called the police.

as for the bravado part............no. I know most people like to showcase differences between law enforcement pointing guns at non threats vs. citizens pointing guns at non threats..........giving law enforcement greater leeway (which is brainwashing at it's worst) but equal protection under the laws should allow citizens to use the same actions as law enforcement, short of arresting someone.
Click to expand...
He should have just worn the gun on his hip and kept his distance. The told the guy to stay off his property or he would call the cops. The implied threat of the gun would have helped neutralize any perceived age advantage.
 
volsrock said:
You dont know their past...Ever seen the show Fear Thy Neighbor?

You have a right to carry a gun on your own property ...this guy may have know his neighbor could get violent and has in the past and the police didnt do a damn thing

If cops know before hand a person can turn violent...bet your ass they will have guns pointed

This guy was on his land with weapons
Click to expand...

all of your points are valid.......but hypothetical..........I can only give an opinion based on the facts laid out, not make assumptions.
 
Nomad said:
But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

.
Click to expand...


The woman shot in the Ohio parking lot...SHOULD HAVE obeyed police orders! She would be alive today




If u are going to blame this 78 yo old man based on what he SHOULD HAVE done. But not blame this woman for what she SHOULD HAVE done!
 
Nomad said:
When I first heard him on the news describing how the guy kept coming at him, I thought that it sounded like a case of self defense.

But still, he should've called the police instead of handling it himself.

This is a good example of how having a gun helps to create a violent situation and outcome that would probably have been handled by the authorities otherwise.

Gives one a sense of bravado.
Click to expand...

Exactly, a beef winding up with one person dead, you see it too often in the news, the disgruntled employee, pissed off boyfriend, without the gun so easily assessable others might be alive today
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top