Joe McCarthy doesn't have the votes 4 impeachment

Cypress said:
On September 1, only two weeks ago, Joe McCarthy said he would be holding a floor vote to open an impeachment inquiry.
Click to expand...

I remember when you libturds were screaming


IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!

Fucking hypocrite...
 
The Repubs have had investigations of the Biens for the last few years. They promised if Joe got in, they would immediately impeach him. But they found nothing to impeach on. So now, they have announced an investigation into finding crimes.
The difference for Trump was that they had the crimes. Trump tried to coerce Ukraine into interfering in our election. That is a crime.
The 2nd was due to his attempt to overthrow the election and stay in power. That was part of many crimes.
No rightys, far right propaganda lies are not proof. Nor can Biden be impeached for what you believe. The Reds have no crimes from Joe Biden.
 
Lightbringer said:
No. If you can't restate it then it isn't worth reading.
Click to expand...

Fine, for the intellectually lazy, here's the post:

The only things I question in this are:

1. Do the Republicans have or can obtain sufficient evidence that Joke is clearly guilty of serious crimes and should be impeached.

and,

2. Are the Democrats, as a party of the Left, willing to see that, if such evidence becomes available, and get onboard with an impeachment.

At this point, I see this as item 1 being a very distinct possibility but not a sure thing. As such, if it is shown Joke was seriously involved, then I have serious doubts about #2 because the Left doesn't give a shit that one of theirs is an outright criminal, and that's where the problem begins.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Fine, for the intellectually lazy, here's the post:

The only things I question in this are:

1. Do the Republicans have or can obtain sufficient evidence that Joke is clearly guilty of serious crimes and should be impeached.

and,

2. Are the Democrats, as a party of the Left, willing to see that, if such evidence becomes available, and get onboard with an impeachment.

At this point, I see this as item 1 being a very distinct possibility but not a sure thing. As such, if it is shown Joke was seriously involved, then I have serious doubts about #2 because the Left doesn't give a shit that one of theirs is an outright criminal, and that's where the problem begins.
Click to expand...

DoU understand that the avatar you are attempting to converse with us almost certainly driven by the WOKE tribe....the Revolution?

At some point you fuckers need to learn.
 
Nordberg said:
The Repubs have had investigations of the Biens for the last few years. They promised if Joe got in, they would immediately impeach him. But they found nothing to impeach on. So now, they have announced an investigation into finding crimes.
The difference for Trump was that they had the crimes. Trump tried to coerce Ukraine into interfering in our election. That is a crime.
The 2nd was due to his attempt to overthrow the election and stay in power. That was part of many crimes.
No rightys, far right propaganda lies are not proof. Nor can Biden be impeached for what you believe. The Reds have no crimes from Joe Biden.
Click to expand...

IMPEACH! IMPEACH! IMPEACH!

protester-calling-trumps-impeachment.jpg

5dc9ab0d3afd3747fa24c834

39928986-028e-4ea1-a6f1-c44153d5d43f-AP_Trump_Impeachment_New_York.JPG


NEVER FORGET!
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Fine, for the intellectually lazy, here's the post:

The only things I question in this are:

1. Do the Republicans have or can obtain sufficient evidence that Joke is clearly guilty of serious crimes and should be impeached.

and,

2. Are the Democrats, as a party of the Left, willing to see that, if such evidence becomes available, and get onboard with an impeachment.

At this point, I see this as item 1 being a very distinct possibility but not a sure thing. As such, if it is shown Joke was seriously involved, then I have serious doubts about #2 because the Left doesn't give a shit that one of theirs is an outright criminal, and that's where the problem begins.
Click to expand...

Ok, for the stupid...the GOP is on the same side as "Biden"....they aren't interested in hurting him, they are engaging in political theater for you.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No different. I've said it more than once. Successful impeachments gain momentum and bipartisan support as they progress. If they don't, they should be dropped by the party bringing it because they will fail. That goes for anyone that is subject to impeachment.
Click to expand...
trump's terrorist attack had bipartisan support for impeachment. McConnell refused to convict, but said that trump should be convicted via the legal system.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
No different. I've said it more than once. Successful impeachments gain momentum and bipartisan support as they progress. If they don't, they should be dropped by the party bringing it because they will fail. That goes for anyone that is subject to impeachment.
Click to expand...
But you don't believe that if Clinton plotted a terrorist attack, she should be impeached?

Why is that?
 
Nordberg said:
The Repubs have had investigations of the Biens for the last few years. They promised if Joe got in, they would immediately impeach him. But they found nothing to impeach on. So now, they have announced an investigation into finding crimes.
The difference for Trump was that they had the crimes. Trump tried to coerce Ukraine into interfering in our election. That is a crime.
The 2nd was due to his attempt to overthrow the election and stay in power. That was part of many crimes.
No rightys, far right propaganda lies are not proof. Nor can Biden be impeached for what you believe. The Reds have no crimes from Joe Biden.
Click to expand...
Correct.

But this is just about mining for a modicum of information that can be twisted on Fox every night next year.

"Biden spoke with his son on the phone...on numerous occasions".

That right there should be a crime.
 
Cypress said:
"on September 1st, that’s when Kevin McCarthy told Breitbart News, the conservative news outlet, that there would actually be a vote on the House floor to open up a formal impeachment inquiry."


^ from the article
Click to expand...
exactly fuckwit.....a vote on an impeachment inquiry......have you forgotten 2020 already?........the inquiry begins hearings, followed (or not) by a vote on impeachment......good lord, you folks did it twice, once just weeks before Trump moved out of the White House......how can you not remember this....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
exactly fuckwit.....a vote on an impeachment inquiry......have you forgotten 2020 already?........the inquiry begins hearings, followed (or not) by a vote on impeachment......good lord, you folks did it twice, once just weeks before Trump moved out of the White House......how can you not remember this....
Click to expand...

So Joe McCarthy first said he would hold a floor vote to open an impeachment inquiry,
But then chickened out 12 days later knowing there weren't the votes to pass it.

What a clusterfuck.
 
guno said:
Since your IQ is very low vocational school boy, you first have to have a crime to impeach fishing expeditions have turned up nothing
Click to expand...

ROthefuckingFL.......1) you idiots taught us crimes were no longer necessary.......impeachment can be purely political......in fact I recall lib'ruls on this very board using that to justify the impeachment of Trump.......2) we have evidence that foreign governments paid money to Hunter, that Hunter laundered that money through various LLCs owned by Biden family members, and that Hunter paid bills for Joe.......now all we need do is verify the paper trail from A to B (or U to H to J as may be).......taking bribes is in fact a crime.....a very serious crime as it applies to vice presidents........
 
Cypress said:
So Joe McCarthy first said he would hold a floor vote to open an impeachment inquiry,
But then chickened out 12 days later knowing there weren't the votes to pass it.

What a clusterfuck.
Click to expand...

and Nancy once said there would be no impeachment vote on Trump if there was no evidence of a crime........double clusterfuck.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
and Nancy once said there would be no impeachment vote on Trump if there was no evidence of a crime........double clusterfuck.......
Click to expand...

So you agree that even though Republicans control the house, the evidence for high crimes and misdemeanors are so weak they don't even have the votes to initiate a simple inquiry like Joe McCarthy promised.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top