There is a 'preponderance of evidence' he raped/Sexually assaulted her which a jury found in its judgment, and a judge has found in the appeal.
If you think it is a big win that a jury said 'he did it, he forced himself on her, but we cannot be sure if he penetrated her with his finger or his penis', ...
... then so be it.
If you think it is a big win for Trump that a judge, in his counter suit providing a 'Finding' that he did in fact rape her regardless of the peculiarities around digital and penil penetration...
... then so be it.
Call that a win for Trump.
We already know Trump's M.O. He admitted it.
Trump was wrong THIS TIME. He could NOT 'get away with anything'.
He took her shopping, he grabbed her by the pussy. he sunk a finger or his penis.
If you want to call Trump getting busted for that a win... go ahead.
There was no evidence not even a date it happened. There was nothing but her story and hearsay evidence