Will Meadows Flip?

Althea

Althea

Althea told me...
Given the very specific question that Jones wanted both sides to argue, I really thought Meadows would be headed to Federal court.

I guess not. So now it just remains to be seen if he flips sooner as opposed to later?

[h=1]UPDATE 2-Mark Meadows fails in bid to move Georgia election case to federal court[/h]
 
Althea said:
Given the very specific question that Jones wanted both sides to argue, I really thought Meadows would be headed to Federal court.

I guess not. So now it just remains to be seen if he flips sooner as opposed to later?

[h=1]UPDATE 2-Mark Meadows fails in bid to move Georgia election case to federal court[/h]
Click to expand...

He's headed to prison.
 
BidenPresident said:
He's headed to prison.
Click to expand...
He'll flip. Given that this will be televised, I'm interested to see the oral arguments presented in response to Jones' question
Jones last week asked and received legal briefs from both sides about whether even Meadows is entitled to be tried in federal court if even one act mentioned in the indictment could be considered as falling under his job description
Click to expand...
.

So none of the charges addressed actions that would be considered part of Meadows' duties? The judge seemed to give the defense a gaping hole to walk through.

Or the prosecution made a convincing argument.
 
Althea said:
He'll flip. Given that this will be televised, I'm interested to see the oral arguments presented in response to Jones' question
[FONT=&].

So none of the charges addressed actions that would be considered part of Meadows' duties? The judge seemed to give the defense a gaping hole to walk through.

Or the prosecution made a convincing argument.[/FONT]
Click to expand...

For Trump, committing crimes is part of the job.
 
Judge Denies Meadows’s Request to Move Georgia Case to Federal Court

Georgia prosecutors leading the criminal election interference case against former President Donald J. Trump and 18 of his allies notched a victory on Friday when a judge rejected an effort by Mark Meadows, Mr. Trump’s former White House chief of staff, to move his case from state court to federal court.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/us/mark-meadows-georgia-federal-court-denial.html
 
Althea said:
I'm quite surprised at this ruling, as it seemed pretty easy to find ONE charge that might be construed as part of Meadows' official duties.

I figured that said charge could simply be dropped if one were found.
Click to expand...

Judge knew Meadows was not acting as a government official.
 
Althea said:
Given the very specific question that Jones wanted both sides to argue, I really thought Meadows would be headed to Federal court.

I guess not. So now it just remains to be seen if he flips sooner as opposed to later?

[h=1]UPDATE 2-Mark Meadows fails in bid to move Georgia election case to federal court[/h]
Click to expand...

I think his testimony ruined any chance the prosecution would get any value out of him flipping.
 
Althea said:
He'll flip. Given that this will be televised, I'm interested to see the oral arguments presented in response to Jones' question
.

So none of the charges addressed actions that would be considered part of Meadows' duties? The judge seemed to give the defense a gaping hole to walk through.

Or the prosecution made a convincing argument.
Click to expand...

Meadows actions with the fake electors were clearly not a part of his job. As the judge correctly pointed out, the federal government has absolutely no role to play elections.
 
Jarod said:
I think his testimony ruined any chance the prosecution would get any value out of him flipping.
Click to expand...
Disagree. Meadows was pretty narrow in his admissions.

He can certainly provide proof of a rather deep conspiracy re. Jan 6, and provide quite a bit of incite into the private meetings re. same.
 
Jarod said:
Meadows actions with the fake electors were clearly not a part of his job. As the judge correctly pointed out, the federal government has absolutely no role to play elections.
Click to expand...
I don't remember how many charges were brought against him, but the judge asked if only 1 were within the scope of his job, should the case be moved?
I haven't seen anything about the hearing yet today. I'll catch it tonight on the news.
 
Althea said:
Given the very specific question that Jones wanted both sides to argue, I really thought Meadows would be headed to Federal court.

I guess not. So now it just remains to be seen if he flips sooner as opposed to later?

[h=1]UPDATE 2-Mark Meadows fails in bid to move Georgia election case to federal court[/h]
Click to expand...

Rumour has it Meadows has already flipped.

Trump is fucked. So many of his staff have already flipped on him. Trump is fucked.

Did I tell you Trump is fucked?
 
Althea said:
Disagree. Meadows was pretty narrow in his admissions.

He can certainly provide proof of a rather deep conspiracy re. Jan 6, and provide quite a bit of incite into the private meetings re. same.
Click to expand...

On cross he was severely impeached with an email about coordinating the fake electors after he testified that he had not done so.
 
Joe Capitalist said:
Rumour has it Meadows has already flipped.

Trump is fucked. So many of his staff have already flipped on him. Trump is fucked.

Did I tell you Trump is fucked?
Click to expand...
Meadows has already claimed that he was working at the direction of trump, but I believe Meadows will offer a ton of insight into the plotting of the terrorst attack.

Yes...trump is fucked and that's why he's already working toward jury nullification every day.
 
Jarod said:
On cross he was severely impeached with an email about coordinating the fake electors after he testified that he had not done so.
Click to expand...
I didn't know Meadows was on the stand? But the issue is whether or not he has even more damning evidence to spill
 
Althea said:
He'll flip. Given that this will be televised, I'm interested to see the oral arguments presented in response to Jones' question
[FONT=&].

So none of the charges addressed actions that would be considered part of Meadows' duties? The judge seemed to give the defense a gaping hole to walk through.

Or the prosecution made a convincing argument.[/FONT]
Click to expand...

Not a lawyer, but I think Meadows is headed for prison. He'd best cut a deal.
 
Doc Dutch said:
Not a lawyer, but I think Meadows is headed for prison. He'd best cut a deal.
Click to expand...
This is where the Smith case might overlap. He's literally the fly on the wall during the plotting of the terrorist act, as well as what trump was doing the entire time the attack was going on.

Not sure it that's possible? Fed. cooperation to lessen State charges? Given that this is a conspiracy case, he no doubt has a lot of inside info regarding the discussions that went on between trump, Graham, and other criminals in Congress.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top