First Lady tests positive for COVID

It wouldn't be shocking. I'm as far from an expert on this stuff as one could imagine - but things like this do adapt in response to whatever defenses we come up with.

It's what makes some viruses very pesky.

If the virus 'changes', it is not longer covid19. Viruses cannot change. They are not alive.
 
Looked it up - Biden did say that in 2021. Dumb thing to say, and it looks like he caught quite a bit of criticism for it from the media & medical community.

For years now, it is accepted and known that the vaccine does NOT prevent transmission. It's not some big revelation.

If the 'vaccine' does not prevent covid, it doesn't work.
 
I encourage you to dig into it. Really. And not as a GOTCHA either. I like it when people put in the work and learn the truth themselves.

People have already shown him the data. He's just making an argument of the Stone fallacy, trying to play dumb.
 
I will. But it sounds like conspiracy stuff to me.

I know people who believe that's true. But it seems to be based more on a general distrust of the gov't & science than on reality.

Science is not government or a government agency. Random numbers are not science. Denying what has been shown to you already and mindlessly asking for it again is just RQAA.
 
Okay, so you "trusted the experts" and you got misled.

Are you going to "trust the experts" the next time around?

I wasn't misled, personally. I got vaxxed & boosted. I'm fine. I'm not getting COVID.

I don't buy the conspiracies. They aren't logical - if there was a gov't effort to mislead the public, it would not be secret for long, and would be an epic scandal.

I think the scientific community did the best they could. It's amazing to me that the expectation is that they fully understand a new virus & what the best defense should be immediately. Do people really think that?

And if you don't trust the scientific community - who are YOU going to listen to next time around? Trump? Tucker? The Proud Boys?
 
If you had a higher IQ, vols, you'd know that the COVID vaccine helps prevent infection but, if a new varient is caught, it lessens the effects. From your link: "Both Biden and the first lady tested positive for COVID-19 last summer, and they each experienced mild symptoms. "

It's no different than people who get flu shots and still catch the flu; the effects are lessen if infected. People over 65 or other health compromising factors benefit from the vaccine. I've had COVID twice (maybe three times unvaccinated) and I will get my booster when it comes out. Same for all my other vaccines; annual flu and, when time requires, pneumonia, tetanus, etc.

You, OTOH, should never get any vaccines. Never take any medicine prescribed to you. Just keep smoking pure, clean Crystal Meth to prevent the FBI nanobots from tracking your location. :thup:

You are denying history again, Sock. You are also trying to make false equivalence fallacies and chanting the usual Church of Covid scripture.
 
Indeed.

That pendejo follows me around like a puppy.

I never reply to the pierce of mierda, I reply to the Thread.

I only see his posts when someone replies to him. It’s enough to see the merit in, “piece of mierda.”

Hey, Earl - you spelled "deficit" wrong on the new thread you blocked everyone from.

Just pointing it out because you're usually the grammar police around here.
 
The current vaccine wasn't designed for the latest variant.

There is no 'variant' of a variant. It's either covid19 or something else. Covid19 is itself a variant of the Covid/SARS series.

I am convinced that just about any virus will create a positive 'test result' for covid.
 
Real doctors know the same thing applies to annual flu viruses which is why a new flu vaccine is made available every year.

IIRC, the three most common variants are used in the vaccine but it's not a guarantee.

The idiocy of the annual flu 'vaccines' has simply been extended to annual covid 'vaccines'.
 
No, the problem was there it’s just getting more attention because of conspiracy theories.

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2019-03-heart-increasingly-common-young-adults.html

“The study, which is the first to compare young (41-50 years old) to very young (40 or younger) heart attack survivors, found that among patients who suffer a heart attack at a young age overall, 1 in 5 is 40 or younger. Moreover, during the 16-year study period (2000 to 2016), the proportion of very young people having a heart attack has been increasing, rising by 2 percent each year for the last 10 years.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy.
 
Back
Top