Mark Meadows’s job wasn’t to help Trump steal the 2020 election

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
But the Jan. 2 phone call neither was “perfect,” as Mr. Trump claims, nor did it have anything to do with federal operations. Mr. Meadows’s defense defies the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official roles to influence elections. Even in the White House, where the lines sometimes get blurry, there’s an important distinction between the work someone does for their taxpayer-funded paycheck and outright electioneering. Mr. Meadows wasn’t just acting as a staffer for his his boss; he was clearly advocating on behalf of the reelection campaign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/30/meadows-trump-georgia-federal-court/
 
Last edited:
But the Jan. 2 phone call neither was “perfect,” as Mr. Trump claims, nor did it have anything to do with federal operations. Mr. Meadows’s defense defies the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official roles to influence elections. Even in the White House, where the lines sometimes get blurry, there’s an important distinction between the work someone does for their taxpayer-funded paycheck and outright electioneering. Mr. Meadows wasn’t just acting as a staffer for his boss; he was clearly advocating on behalf of the reelection campaign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/30/meadows-trump-georgia-federal-court/
 
BidenPresident said:
But the Jan. 2 phone call neither was “perfect,” as Mr. Trump claims, nor did it have anything to do with federal operations. Mr. Meadows’s defense defies the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official roles to influence elections. Even in the White House, where the lines sometimes get blurry, there’s an important distinction between the work someone does for their taxpayer-funded paycheck and outright electioneering. Mr. Meadows wasn’t just acting as a staffer for his boss; he was clearly advocating on behalf of the reelection campaign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/30/meadows-trump-georgia-federal-court/
Click to expand...

Don't drop the soap Meadows
 
BidenPresident said:
But the Jan. 2 phone call neither was “perfect,” as Mr. Trump claims, nor did it have anything to do with federal operations. Mr. Meadows’s defense defies the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from using their official roles to influence elections. Even in the White House, where the lines sometimes get blurry, there’s an important distinction between the work someone does for their taxpayer-funded paycheck and outright electioneering. Mr. Meadows wasn’t just acting as a staffer for his his boss; he was clearly advocating on behalf of the reelection campaign.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/30/meadows-trump-georgia-federal-court/
Click to expand...

Hatch act, isn't that what the FBI was guilty of violating in the 2020 election? Something about a laptop if I remember correctly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top