Giuliani struggling under massive legal bills after defending Trump

Will Rudy roll on Trump?

  • No; everyone is loyal to Trump and are innocent

    Votes: 2 20.0%

  • Yes; it's every person for themselves as the SS Trump sinks under the weight of their crimes

    Votes: 6 60.0%

  • I don't know/no opinion

    Votes: 2 20.0%
  • Total voters
    10
Tinkerpeach said:
This is the point of the lawsuits.

To crush the republicans under legal bills and trials.

The left is evil and will use any means to destroy their enemies.

They did this with Sarah Palin also.

They filed 22 lawsuits against her in the space of three months and she effectively couldn't do her job and had to resign.

Once she did they dropped all the lawsuits.

Governors in Alaska are not entitled to government representation in legal issues, they need to pay for it out of pocket.
Click to expand...

Poor widdle victims (of their own design).

iwX3YMZ.gif
 
Tinkerpeach said:
It's not paranoid it's what actually happened.

They filed a lawsuit against her saying she was favoring a corporation because she wore a snowmobile suit with the word Arctic Cat on it which is the name of the company.

It was ridiculous.

Every case that did go to court was dismissed but she still had to pay the legal fees and it became too much.

She left office and the cases were dropped by the DNC.

And mind you, this is after Obama had already won the election.

That's how much they hated her.

The DNC didn't even have a chapter in Alaska but they opened one up just to go after her. Their stated goal on their website which has since been deleted was to remove Palin from office.
Click to expand...

Actually not, but then you just contradicted your prior lie that once the Grifta-from-Wasilla resigned, the lawsuits "were dropped." BTW, these were mostly private citizens -- Republicans even -- filing various ethics charges against the half-term/half-wit governor. I know a couple of them. They had nothing to do with the dreaded DNC.
 
domer76 said:
I guess she shouldn’t have fired the head of public safety for not firing her brother-in-law, who was having custody battles with her sister.
Click to expand...

She probably should not have continued to live in Wasilla while accepting per diem to the tune of thousands of dollars, either. And who can forget ACES, her signature legislation that was immediately repealed -- by Republicans -- upon her exit? I wonder how many legal bucks she lost suing the NYT for libel and losing?

Stinkerbelle has some weird heroes. :laugh:
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Actually not, but then you just contradicted your prior lie that once the Grifta-from-Wasilla resigned, the lawsuits "were dropped." BTW, these were mostly private citizens -- Republicans even -- filing various ethics charges against the half-term/half-wit governor. I know a couple of them. They had nothing to do with the dreaded DNC.
Click to expand...

All instigated by the DNC.

For standing to sue they needed plaintiffs but they organized them all.

The DNC used their lawyers and paid all court fees, these individuals were merely names on a piece of paper.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
All instigated by the DNC.
Click to expand...

Bullshit. You keep repeating this lie but offer nothing to back it up. As I said, I know at least two of the private citizens who filed ethics charges against the sleazeskank. Neither are Democrat voters. Nor were the various govt. authorities who investigated the complaints. Some were dismissed for lack of evidence; others were pursued. $arah had to repay thousands of dollars. This had absolutely nothing to do with the DNC.

I do stipulate, however, that we (D)s derived a great stock of Schadenfreude because of it. :rofl2:

Whatever their outcomes, citizen-led ethics charges raise valid concerns about public policy and official conduct, says Zane Henning of Wasilla, who has known Palin since he was 12 and is accusing her of impropriety. Three days after Palin announced her resignation, he filed a new complaint concerning the governor’s practice of collecting per-diem payments for days and nights at her Wasilla home.
Click to expand...
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Bullshit. You keep repeating this lie but offer nothing to back it up. As I said, I know at least two of the private citizens who filed ethics charges against the sleazeskank. Neither are Democrat voters. Nor were the various govt. authorities who investigated the complaints. Some were dismissed for lack of evidence; others were pursued. $arah had to repay thousands of dollars. This had absolutely nothing to do with the DNC.

I do stipulate, however, that we (D)s derived a great stock of Schadenfreude because of it. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

Like I said, they were all organized by the DNC.

All of those lawsuits were either dismissed or dropped when she left office.
 
Rudy is fantasizing.


Rudy Giuliani claims new 'scientific evidence' will prove his innocence

Rudy Giuliani claimed on Sunday to have new "scientific evidence" to prove widespread election fraud and that he is innocent after being charged in Georgia.

"The first thing is, I don't think I'm giving anything away, I'm just going to tell you my strategy," Giuliani told the caller. "I'm going to follow Mark Meadows and file as soon as I do the arraignment, I'm going to file a motion for removal to federal court, which I would say almost virtually will be granted."

https://www.rawstory.com/rudy-giuliani-scientific-evidence/
 
Trumpet said:
Rudy is fantasizing.


Rudy Giuliani claims new 'scientific evidence' will prove his innocence

Rudy Giuliani claimed on Sunday to have new "scientific evidence" to prove widespread election fraud and that he is innocent after being charged in Georgia.

"The first thing is, I don't think I'm giving anything away, I'm just going to tell you my strategy," Giuliani told the caller. "I'm going to follow Mark Meadows and file as soon as I do the arraignment, I'm going to file a motion for removal to federal court, which I would say almost virtually will be granted."

https://www.rawstory.com/rudy-giuliani-scientific-evidence/
Click to expand...

Is Rudy going through the DT's? Delirium tremens, not Donald Trump...but the results may be the same. LOL

https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/delirium-tremens/
Delirium tremens, also called DTs or alcohol withdrawal delirium (AWD), is a severe type of withdrawal from alcohol. It usually starts about 2 to 3 days after someone who’s dependent on alcohol ends a long drinking binge.

DTs usually lasts for 2 to 3 days, but symptoms may linger for as long as a week.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top