Scott Adams on Trump Indictments

domer76 said:
If you read his text, he is the classic Trumptard election denier.

What I have or not have done with my life is irrelevant to the question at hand. That is your pathetic appeal to authority. Adams wrote a funny cartoon. Big fucking deal. Now he doesn’t and guess what, Rufus? The world still goes round.

My credentials? No more than his. Except one thing. I rely on what numerous investigations, counts, recounts, court cases, audits, re-audits, debunked fraud claims, SOS certifications of election results tell us. ZERO basis for all the election fraud claims.

He doesn’t. He buys into all the conspiracy bullshit that the rest of you do. And he DOES have a soapbox much taller than mine.

So, you gave a very apt description of him. “ Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.”

And, BTW Jethro, based on all your chest thumping predictions from the past, you should refrain from using the term loudmouth. Unless you’re referring to yourself, of course.
Click to expand...

You rely on what MSNBCCP and The Guardian tell you you think.

You serve your party. Right and wrong are just a matter of what serves the party.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
So you want to just find people guilty without a trial where they can defend themselves?

Trump said to find the votes, he was probably meaning by holding a recount, he never once suggested anything illegal be done and he never threatened him with prosecution.

The evidence against Biden is overwhelming.

He threatened to withhold funding from Ukraine unless they fired one single guy who he said was corrupt who just happened to be the guy investigating the company where his son worked yet we give billions to nations all over the world who have more than their fair share of corrupt people but Biden never was sent to withhold their funding was he.

Biden said repeatedly he had no knowledge of Hunter's business dealing which we now know is a lie. Even Biden isn't saying that anymore.

We have whistleblowers and eyewitness testimony that says Biden was directly involved.

We have 20 shell corporations that were opened under the Biden's to funnel at least 20 million dollars from Ukraine and China to at least nine family members of the Biden's at which point they were quickly shut down.

And the investigation is still ongoing, it hasn't even reached it's pinnacle yet so expect even more direct evidence to come out soon. The house oversight committee is currently following the money trail.
Click to expand...

He threatened to withhold money, but it’s a lie that the guy he wanted fired was investigating Hunters company. Absolutely untrue, debunked over and over again, yet it’s still your ilk’s little red wagon.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
So you want to just find people guilty without a trial where they can defend themselves?

Trump said to find the votes, he was probably meaning by holding a recount, he never once suggested anything illegal be done and he never threatened him with prosecution.

The evidence against Biden is overwhelming.

He threatened to withhold funding from Ukraine unless they fired one single guy who he said was corrupt who just happened to be the guy investigating the company where his son worked yet we give billions to nations all over the world who have more than their fair share of corrupt people but Biden never was sent to withhold their funding was he.

Biden said repeatedly he had no knowledge of Hunter's business dealing which we now know is a lie. Even Biden isn't saying that anymore.

We have whistleblowers and eyewitness testimony that says Biden was directly involved.

We have 20 shell corporations that were opened under the Biden's to funnel at least 20 million dollars from Ukraine and China to at least nine family members of the Biden's at which point they were quickly shut down.

And the investigation is still ongoing, it hasn't even reached it's pinnacle yet so expect even more direct evidence to come out soon. The house oversight committee is currently following the money trail.
Click to expand...

How do you know it’s a lie when Biden said he had no knowledge of Hunters business dealings? Cuz you say so?
 
Tinkerpeach said:
So you want to just find people guilty without a trial where they can defend themselves?

Trump said to find the votes, he was probably meaning by holding a recount, he never once suggested anything illegal be done and he never threatened him with prosecution.

The evidence against Biden is overwhelming.

He threatened to withhold funding from Ukraine unless they fired one single guy who he said was corrupt who just happened to be the guy investigating the company where his son worked yet we give billions to nations all over the world who have more than their fair share of corrupt people but Biden never was sent to withhold their funding was he.

Biden said repeatedly he had no knowledge of Hunter's business dealing which we now know is a lie. Even Biden isn't saying that anymore.

We have whistleblowers and eyewitness testimony that says Biden was directly involved.

We have 20 shell corporations that were opened under the Biden's to funnel at least 20 million dollars from Ukraine and China to at least nine family members of the Biden's at which point they were quickly shut down.

And the investigation is still ongoing, it hasn't even reached it's pinnacle yet so expect even more direct evidence to come out soon. The house oversight committee is currently following the money trail.
Click to expand...

Did President Biden own or have access to shell companies?
 
Jarod said:
He threatened to withhold money, but it’s a lie that the guy he wanted fired was investigating Hunters company. Absolutely untrue, debunked over and over again, yet it’s still your ilk’s little red wagon.
Click to expand...

Then what was he doing that required Biden to withhold 1 billion from Ukraine to get him fired?

What corruption was he involved in?

Do any of you know.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
Then what was he doing that required Biden to withhold 1 billion from Ukraine to get him fired?

What corruption was he involved in?

Do any of you know.
Click to expand...

I do not know those details except that there was a lot of corruption in Ukraine that the US wanted cleaned up before giving them aid. It was part of the legislation.

So you are admitting you have no evidence the guy the wanted fired was investigating Hunters company? You just said it because you wanted it to be true? Because Trump said it was true? Or because some right wing whack job cite said it was true?
 
Jarod said:
I do not know those details except that there was a lot of corruption in Ukraine that the US wanted cleaned up before giving them aid. It was part of the legislation.

So you are admitting you have no evidence the guy the wanted fired was investigating Hunters company? You just said it because you wanted it to be true? Because Trump said it was true? Or because some right wing whack job cite said it was true?
Click to expand...

There is a ton of corruption in Ukraine, Zelensky just fired three people for corruption so why did Biden focus on one guy who was investigating Burisma that Hunter had ties to?

Why didn't Biden demand they fire all the corrupt people?

Why didn't Biden withhold aid from all the other nations we give money to that are known for corruption?

What made this guy so dangerous?

C'mon, if you can't make the connection here you are in denial.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
The indictments are all bogus anyways, none of it will stick.

It's all just to harass Trump to throw off his campaign.

The only important thing going on is the investigation into Biden's bribery scandal which is ramping up daily.

If the DNC were smart they would already be planning to dump him, they can't yet because he still has a year in office, but they should be looking for a new candidate.
Click to expand...

I know you're trying real hard TinkerBitch but you're still not a very good far right-wing troll.

Your triggering drivel is way too obvious.
And your claims are just so outrageous and inane (soldiers struggling to eat...), one has to think: "Naw, can't be. Nobody's that stupid to think that. No way."

Nobody here believes you're just another poster. Everyone knows you're a pathetic far right-wing troll.
Your game no longer works here. Find another political website, TinkerBitch.
 
Jarod said:
He threatened to withhold money, but it’s a lie that the guy he wanted fired was investigating Hunters company. Absolutely untrue, debunked over and over again, yet it’s still your ilk’s little red wagon.
Click to expand...


ROFL

You pathetic fucking liar.

{[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]“He was a threat. He ended up seizing assets of [Burisma owner] Nikolai [Zlochevsky] — a house, some cars, a couple properties. And Nikolai actually never went back to Ukraine after Shokin seized all of his assets,” Archer told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.[/COLOR][COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Shokin’s office won a court order to seize Zlochevsky’s property on Feb. 2, 2016, the Kyiv Post reported at the time. Shokin was fired on March 29, purportedly due to his own corruption.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Archer’s remarks are significant because they contradict the position of House Democrats that Shokin was not considered a threat to Burisma — a point likely to be hotly contested if Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) launches an impeachment inquiry, as he said last week was becoming likely.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Archer confirmed Monday during an interview with the House Oversight Committee that Joe Biden attended an April 2015 dinner in Washington with Burisma board adviser Vadym Pozharskyi and that Hunter stepped away from a December 2015 meeting in Dubai to call his father, joined by both Pozharskyi and Zlochevsky. Just days before that call, Biden had addressed Ukraine’s parliament during a trip to Kyiv.}

Viktor Shokin was 'threat' to Burisma, says Hunter Biden partner Devon Archer (nypost.com)[/COLOR]
 
Tinkerpeach said:
There is a ton of corruption in Ukraine, Zelensky just fired three people for corruption so why did Biden focus on one guy who was investigating Burisma that Hunter had ties to?

Why didn't Biden demand they fire all the corrupt people?

Why didn't Biden withhold aid from all the other nations we give money to that are known for corruption?

What made this guy so dangerous?

C'mon, if you can't make the connection here you are in denial.
Click to expand...

Like I already pointed out, he was not investigating Burisma. That lie has been debunked. Show me any evidence that the guy he had fired was investigating Burisma?
 
Uncensored2008 said:
ROFL

You pathetic fucking liar.

{[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]“He was a threat. He ended up seizing assets of [Burisma owner] Nikolai [Zlochevsky] — a house, some cars, a couple properties. And Nikolai actually never went back to Ukraine after Shokin seized all of his assets,” Archer told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.[/COLOR][COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Shokin’s office won a court order to seize Zlochevsky’s property on Feb. 2, 2016, the Kyiv Post reported at the time. Shokin was fired on March 29, purportedly due to his own corruption.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Archer’s remarks are significant because they contradict the position of House Democrats that Shokin was not considered a threat to Burisma — a point likely to be hotly contested if Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) launches an impeachment inquiry, as he said last week was becoming likely.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=var(--wp--preset--color--gray-g)]Archer confirmed Monday during an interview with the House Oversight Committee that Joe Biden attended an April 2015 dinner in Washington with Burisma board adviser Vadym Pozharskyi and that Hunter stepped away from a December 2015 meeting in Dubai to call his father, joined by both Pozharskyi and Zlochevsky. Just days before that call, Biden had addressed Ukraine’s parliament during a trip to Kyiv.}

Viktor Shokin was 'threat' to Burisma, says Hunter Biden partner Devon Archer (nypost.com)[/COLOR]
Click to expand...

So some guy on Tucker show said the guy was a threat? That’s now evidence? None of your site say what you claim they say. You guys are fucked up. Doublespeak.
 
I can see how dumb people are fooled. By the way, Tucker, Carlson’s guests talk, but they don’t say what you think they’re saying.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
How many lawsuits?

60 was your lie?

Show us verdicts in 3?

Ah, but you can't. Because your party blackballed Trump from the justice system. Every man has a right to his day in court - unless they are an enemy of the Reich.
Click to expand...

What does 60+ mean, you fucking idiot? Verdicts? LOL

The suits were so without merit, they couldn’t even get that far.

Reich, Reich, Reich, Reich
Reich, Reich, Reich, Reich

Say Himmler for us. Betcha can’t say it just once!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top