Scott Adams on Trump Indictments

I hope Scott is right. :thup:


"Joseph Stalin 1879–1953
Soviet dictator

I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how.
said in 1923; Boris Bazhanov The Memoirs of Stalin's Former Secretary (1992); see Stoppard


The State is an instrument in the hands of the ruling class, used to break the resistance of the adversaries of that class.
Foundations of Leninism (1924) section 4/6"

https://www.oxfordreference.com/dis...3;jsessionid=ADB24DE1526F7DC2C93E1BFE9643BF1A
 
The indictments are all bogus anyways, none of it will stick.

It's all just to harass Trump to throw off his campaign.

The only important thing going on is the investigation into Biden's bribery scandal which is ramping up daily.

If the DNC were smart they would already be planning to dump him, they can't yet because he still has a year in office, but they should be looking for a new candidate.
 
The indictments are all bogus anyways, none of it will stick.

It's all just to harass Trump to throw off his campaign.

The only important thing going on is the investigation into Biden's bribery scandal which is ramping up daily.

If the DNC were smart they would already be planning to dump him, they can't yet because he still has a year in office, but they should be looking for a new candidate.

You have yet to find any evidence of Biden bribery, but maybe its time to look into Jared Kushner corruption?
 
Years of writing mediocre office humor has turned Scott Adams into an expert on elections and what constitutes a coup. Trump should hire him for representation.
 
Investigations, audits, counts and recounts, 60+ failed lawsuits, certification by SOS in all 50 states, fraud allegations turning out to be bogus, on and on. All came to one conclusion. No evidence of voter fraud to influence the election. NONE. ZERO. ZIP. NADA

The most secure election in American history.
 
Investigations, audits, counts and recounts, 60+ failed lawsuits, certification by SOS in all 50 states, fraud allegations turning out to be bogus, on and on. All came to one conclusion. No evidence of voter fraud to influence the election. NONE. ZERO. ZIP. NADA

The most secure election in American history.

But it FEELS like a fraudulent election and we all know the famous saying by Ben Shapiro, "Facts care an awful lot about your fee fees".
 
Appeal to authority.

Scott Adams wrote a funny cartoon and that makes him an expert on election security.

So tell us, what exactly are your credentials that gives you the authority to just dismiss what Adams is saying. Your years of working at LOWES? :thinking: :laugh: Im betting you arent in the same galaxy as Adams when it comes to what you know or have done with your life. Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.
 
So tell us, what exactly are your credentials that gives you the authority to just dismiss what Adams is saying. Your years of working at LOWES? :thinking: :laugh: Im betting you arent in the same galxy as Adams when it comes to what you know or have done with your life. Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.

If you read his text, he is the classic Trumptard election denier.

What I have or not have done with my life is irrelevant to the question at hand. That is your pathetic appeal to authority. Adams wrote a funny cartoon. Big fucking deal. Now he doesn’t and guess what, Rufus? The world still goes round.

My credentials? No more than his. Except one thing. I rely on what numerous investigations, counts, recounts, court cases, audits, re-audits, debunked fraud claims, SOS certifications of election results tell us. ZERO basis for all the election fraud claims.

He doesn’t. He buys into all the conspiracy bullshit that the rest of you do. And he DOES have a soapbox much taller than mine.

So, you gave a very apt description of him. “ Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.”

And, BTW Jethro, based on all your chest thumping predictions from the past, you should refrain from using the term loudmouth. Unless you’re referring to yourself, of course.
 
The indictments are all bogus anyways, none of it will stick.

It's all just to harass Trump to throw off his campaign.

The only important thing going on is the investigation into Biden's bribery scandal which is ramping up daily.

If the DNC were smart they would already be planning to dump him, they can't yet because he still has a year in office, but they should be looking for a new candidate.

Agree, Trump is more innocent than Jesus.
 
So tell us, what exactly are your credentials that gives you the authority to just dismiss what Adams is saying. Your years of working at LOWES? :thinking: :laugh: Im betting you arent in the same galaxy as Adams when it comes to what you know or have done with your life. Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.

Let's assume for a moment that Scott Adams is right and everything becomes corrupt over time. That proves that the GOP and Trump are corrupt. Case closed!!


But the real problem with Scott Adams argument is that it would not be let into a court room since it is irrelevant to the case. Judges restrict the arguments to the indictment and facts that are directly related to the indictment. If Scott Adams were to make that argument in a court room, the court would ask, "Do you have any actual evidence?" Court rulings are made on evidence alone. That is why Trump and election deniers have lost 60 cases. That is why Rudy and others are losing their law licenses. Lawyers can only present evidence that is factual. Speculation is not evidence and never will be in a court of law.
 
If you read his text, he is the classic Trumptard election denier.

What I have or not have done with my life is irrelevant to the question at hand. That is your pathetic appeal to authority. Adams wrote a funny cartoon. Big fucking deal. Now he doesn’t and guess what, Rufus? The world still goes round.

My credentials? No more than his. Except one thing. I rely on what numerous investigations, counts, recounts, court cases, audits, re-audits, debunked fraud claims, SOS certifications of election results tell us. ZERO basis for all the election fraud claims.

He doesn’t. He buys into all the conspiracy bullshit that the rest of you do. And he DOES have a soapbox much taller than mine.

So, you gave a very apt description of him. “ Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.”

And, BTW Jethro, based on all your chest thumping predictions from the past, you should refrain from using the term loudmouth. Unless you’re referring to yourself, of course.

Too funny. A guy living in bumfuck Idaho calling ANYONE Jethro! :laugh:
:chuckle:
 
Do you think that Fanlight Phanny will move this?


“And we can know for sure that the voting results for 2020 violated historical patterns so drastically any reasonable person would have some questions”

If nothing else, Trump’s attorney should use this in his closing arguments. Nothing eases my suspicions like “the system” assuring me that there is nothing wrong with “the system”.
 
Scott is as crazy a rightys as you people are, The fact is according to over 6 Trump court cases, numerous recounts, and election officials going over the voting again and again, we proved our elections are clean and honest. It also proved that rights do not need any data and facts to make claims. Trump said it, so it must be so. Except he lost every damn case. So instead of being able to process what was shown, rightys turned to conspiracies.
Yeah it is a huge plot, secret and impossible to see. It is so good, that it is invisible, and it has no evidence. But who needs that to believe?
 
Scott is as crazy a rightys as you people are, The fact is according to over 6 Trump court cases, numerous recounts, and election officials going over the voting again and again, we proved our elections are clean and honest. It also proved that rights do not need any data and facts to make claims. Trump said it, so it must be so. Except he lost every damn case. So instead of being able to process what was shown, rightys turned to conspiracies.
Yeah it is a huge plot, secret and impossible to see. It is so good, that it is invisible, and it has no evidence. But who needs that to believe?

You're barking mad most of the time, sadly you are unaware of that fact.
 
If you read his text, he is the classic Trumptard election denier.

What I have or not have done with my life is irrelevant to the question at hand. That is your pathetic appeal to authority. Adams wrote a funny cartoon. Big fucking deal. Now he doesn’t and guess what, Rufus? The world still goes round.

My credentials? No more than his. Except one thing. I rely on what numerous investigations, counts, recounts, court cases, audits, re-audits, debunked fraud claims, SOS certifications of election results tell us. ZERO basis for all the election fraud claims.

He doesn’t. He buys into all the conspiracy bullshit that the rest of you do. And he DOES have a soapbox much taller than mine.

So, you gave a very apt description of him. “ Just another ignorant partisan loud mouth on a soap box.”

And, BTW Jethro, based on all your chest thumping predictions from the past, you should refrain from using the term loudmouth. Unless you’re referring to yourself, of course.

He still does, shit for brains!

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 20230812_154251.jpg
    20230812_154251.jpg
    84.1 KB · Views: 24
Back
Top