Another MAGA talking point shot down!

Taichiliberal

Taichiliberal

Shaken, not stirred!
Ever since the Orange Oaf lost the 2020 election to Uncle Joe, the mantra of his sycophants in the GOP, the right wing media and the MAGA crowds of registered Republicans has been that there was definite disparities (if not outright criminal activity) in the vote counting. Now for all this time the general public has been given a rehash of the "official" rulings that the Oaf and his minions were/are dead wrong, and that the 2020 election was secure. But reality and facts don't serve the Oaf and his MAGA cult well, so they just keep repeating such.

Now what caught my eye/ears this morning was a CBS interview with the Oaf's created/appointed security chief for just such a situation....a man he immediately fired when told that the election was secure and he lost fair & square.

Why this man's story has not been repeated loud and often is troubling, because in my opinion it would help silence a lot of MAGA mooks and make them look foolish in the eyes of "undecided" voters. Here's the story, judge for yourself:

Transcript: Chris Krebs on "Face the Nation"


MAJOR GARRETT : Welcome back, up now CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs, who as head of CISA, we'll get into what that means in a second, announced soon after the 2020 election that it was the, quote, 'most secure election in history.' The former president disagreed and memorably to Chris, fired him. Chris, it's good to see you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/transcript-chris-krebs-on-face-the-nation/ar-AA1eROkg
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ever since the Orange Oaf lost the 2020 election to Uncle Joe, the mantra of his sycophants in the GOP, the right wing media and the MAGA crowds of registered Republicans has been that there was definite disparities (if not outright criminal activity) in the vote counting. Now for all this time the general public has been given a rehash of the "official" rulings that the Oaf and his minions were/are dead wrong, and that the 2020 election was secure. But reality and facts don't serve the Oaf and his MAGA cult well, so they just keep repeating such.

Now what caught my eye/ears this morning was a CBS interview with the Oaf's created/appointed security chief for just such a situation....a man he immediately fired when told that the election was secure and he lost fair & square.

Why this man's story has not been repeated loud and often is troubling, because in my opinion it would help silence a lot of MAGA mooks and make them look foolish in the eyes of "undecided" voters. Here's the story, judge for yourself:

Transcript: Chris Krebs on "Face the Nation"


MAJOR GARRETT : Welcome back, up now CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs, who as head of CISA, we'll get into what that means in a second, announced soon after the 2020 election that it was the, quote, 'most secure election in history.' The former president disagreed and memorably to Chris, fired him. Chris, it's good to see you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/transcript-chris-krebs-on-face-the-nation/ar-AA1eROkg
Click to expand...

The head of the Department of Justice told Trump the election was fair.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ever since the Orange Oaf lost the 2020 election to Uncle Joe, the mantra of his sycophants in the GOP, the right wing media and the MAGA crowds of registered Republicans has been that there was definite disparities (if not outright criminal activity) in the vote counting. Now for all this time the general public has been given a rehash of the "official" rulings that the Oaf and his minions were/are dead wrong, and that the 2020 election was secure. But reality and facts don't serve the Oaf and his MAGA cult well, so they just keep repeating such.

Now what caught my eye/ears this morning was a CBS interview with the Oaf's created/appointed security chief for just such a situation....a man he immediately fired when told that the election was secure and he lost fair & square.

Why this man's story has not been repeated loud and often is troubling, because in my opinion it would help silence a lot of MAGA mooks and make them look foolish in the eyes of "undecided" voters. Here's the story, judge for yourself:

Transcript: Chris Krebs on "Face the Nation"


MAJOR GARRETT : Welcome back, up now CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs, who as head of CISA, we'll get into what that means in a second, announced soon after the 2020 election that it was the, quote, 'most secure election in history.' The former president disagreed and memorably to Chris, fired him. Chris, it's good to see you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/transcript-chris-krebs-on-face-the-nation/ar-AA1eROkg
Click to expand...
trump, as well as 'Spray Hair Miller' are both students of Goebbels.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ever since the Orange Oaf lost the 2020 election to Uncle Joe, the mantra of his sycophants in the GOP, the right wing media and the MAGA crowds of registered Republicans has been that there was definite disparities (if not outright criminal activity) in the vote counting. Now for all this time the general public has been given a rehash of the "official" rulings that the Oaf and his minions were/are dead wrong, and that the 2020 election was secure. But reality and facts don't serve the Oaf and his MAGA cult well, so they just keep repeating such.

Now what caught my eye/ears this morning was a CBS interview with the Oaf's created/appointed security chief for just such a situation....a man he immediately fired when told that the election was secure and he lost fair & square.

Why this man's story has not been repeated loud and often is troubling, because in my opinion it would help silence a lot of MAGA mooks and make them look foolish in the eyes of "undecided" voters. Here's the story, judge for yourself:

Transcript: Chris Krebs on "Face the Nation"


MAJOR GARRETT : Welcome back, up now CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs, who as head of CISA, we'll get into what that means in a second, announced soon after the 2020 election that it was the, quote, 'most secure election in history.' The former president disagreed and memorably to Chris, fired him. Chris, it's good to see you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/transcript-chris-krebs-on-face-the-nation/ar-AA1eROkg
Click to expand...

You couldn't be bothered to put said talking point in your OP about the talking point?

That says a lot about you.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ever since the Orange Oaf lost the 2020 election to Uncle Joe, the mantra of his sycophants in the GOP, the right wing media and the MAGA crowds of registered Republicans has been that there was definite disparities (if not outright criminal activity) in the vote counting. Now for all this time the general public has been given a rehash of the "official" rulings that the Oaf and his minions were/are dead wrong, and that the 2020 election was secure. But reality and facts don't serve the Oaf and his MAGA cult well, so they just keep repeating such.

Now what caught my eye/ears this morning was a CBS interview with the Oaf's created/appointed security chief for just such a situation....a man he immediately fired when told that the election was secure and he lost fair & square.

Why this man's story has not been repeated loud and often is troubling, because in my opinion it would help silence a lot of MAGA mooks and make them look foolish in the eyes of "undecided" voters. Here's the story, judge for yourself:

Transcript: Chris Krebs on "Face the Nation"


MAJOR GARRETT : Welcome back, up now CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs, who as head of CISA, we'll get into what that means in a second, announced soon after the 2020 election that it was the, quote, 'most secure election in history.' The former president disagreed and memorably to Chris, fired him. Chris, it's good to see you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/transcript-chris-krebs-on-face-the-nation/ar-AA1eROkg
Click to expand...

Plenty of people told Trump there was fraud.

That is the problem with Smiths case.

He cannot prove what Trump thought.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Ever since the Orange Oaf lost the 2020 election to Uncle Joe, the mantra of his sycophants in the GOP, the right wing media and the MAGA crowds of registered Republicans has been that there was definite disparities (if not outright criminal activity) in the vote counting. Now for all this time the general public has been given a rehash of the "official" rulings that the Oaf and his minions were/are dead wrong, and that the 2020 election was secure. But reality and facts don't serve the Oaf and his MAGA cult well, so they just keep repeating such.

Now what caught my eye/ears this morning was a CBS interview with the Oaf's created/appointed security chief for just such a situation....a man he immediately fired when told that the election was secure and he lost fair & square.

Why this man's story has not been repeated loud and often is troubling, because in my opinion it would help silence a lot of MAGA mooks and make them look foolish in the eyes of "undecided" voters. Here's the story, judge for yourself:

Transcript: Chris Krebs on "Face the Nation"


MAJOR GARRETT : Welcome back, up now CBS News cybersecurity expert and analyst Chris Krebs, who as head of CISA, we'll get into what that means in a second, announced soon after the 2020 election that it was the, quote, 'most secure election in history.' The former president disagreed and memorably to Chris, fired him. Chris, it's good to see you.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/transcript-chris-krebs-on-face-the-nation/ar-AA1eROkg
Click to expand...

Face the nation????? Really? Lmfao
 
Tinkerpeach said:
Plenty of people told Trump there was fraud.

That is the problem with Smiths case.

He cannot prove what Trump thought.
Click to expand...

If Trump thought he could prove fraud, why go with a fake electors scheme, why try to make Jeffery Clark AG so he could overturn the results? Both of these go beyond the scope of challenging results. Imagine how you'd feel if a Democrat did either of those things
.
 
Last edited:
Mr.Badguy said:
If Trump thought he could prove fraud, why go with a fake electors scheme, why try to make Jeffery Clark AG so he could overturn the results? Both of these go beyond the scope of challenging results.
Click to expand...

You sure Trump was the one who did the fake electors?

That is something Smith is going to have to prove and since he had no direct hand in it that will be tough.

Smith will need one of the people that did organize to prove that they were doing it under orders from Trump.

Smith also needs to show that they had specific intent to vote for Trump regardless, again, another very difficult thing to prove in a court of law.
 
floridafan said:
You seem to neglect the people who told him he lost, and will be lined up in court to give their testimony
Click to expand...

Many people told him he didn't also.

That is Smiths problem.

Even if people told Trump he lost did he believe it himself?

If Trump didn't think he did then that's a major thorn in Smiths conspiracy theory.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
Many people told him he didn't also.

That is Smiths problem.

Even if people told Trump he lost did he believe it himself?

If Trump didn't think he did then that's a major thorn in Smiths conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

I just posted a link where Trump has admitted, flat out that he lost, my dear. You cant sugar coat the truth.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
The only pig fucker we've had as president was bill clinton.
Click to expand...


And how do we know that, Tink?

Trump and Clinton were at least two, Kennedy was certainly three, and I'll be that there were many more.

I wouldn't even care about that if they did a good job [and the swine-sex was consensual].
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top