The scandal engulfing Hunter Biden is now so grave even the Left can't ignore it

Joe Capitalist said:
The Daily Mail? BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhHHAAA!!!!

Overall, we rate Daily Mail Right Biased and Questionable due to numerous failed fact checks and poor information sourcing.
Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Right, Propaganda, Conspiracy, Some Fake News, Numerous Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT
Factual Reporting: LOW
Country: United Kingdom
Press Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE
Media Type: Newspaper
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

The Daily Mail is a known supporter of the Conservatives. They are also one of the pro-Brexit tabloids. According to a Reuters article, the Daily Mail published a controversial headline in response to a Brexit Court ruling criticizing the judges by branding them as ‘enemies of the people.’ According to CNBC, the Daily Mail has also been criticized by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales for publishing fake news articles and “hyped up” headlines and “mastered the art of running stories that aren’t true.” Further, CNBC reported that DMG media responded by saying, “DailyMail.com is the very antithesis of click-bait and hype headlines. We just tell stories better than anyone else.”

The Daily Mail tends to publish stories utilizing sensationalized headlines with emotionally loaded wordings such as “Woman, 63, ‘becomes PREGNANT in the mouth’ with baby squid after eating calamari”, which is a misleading headline. In 2017, Wikipedia banned the Daily Mail as an ‘unreliable’ source. When it comes to sourcing information, they use minimal hyperlinked sourcing and sourcing to themselves. Further, a Reuters institute survey found that 26% of respondents trust their news coverage and 47% do not, ranking them #11 in trust of the major UK news providers. In general, most stories favor the right; however, the Daily Mail will report either side of the story is sensational enough.
Click to expand...

Another candidate for Kunt's Korner.
 
The Biden's are definitely in trouble at this point.

Looks like hunter is going to prison and joe will be impeached if not also sentenced with charges.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
The Biden's are definitely in trouble at this point.

Looks like hunter is going to prison and joe will be impeached if not also sentenced with charges.
Click to expand...
They are both going to have some explaining to do....I wonder if Hunter is in Delaware right now discussing things with his father for the very first time...;)
 
TOP said:
They are both going to have some explaining to do....I wonder if Hunter is in Delaware right now discussing things with his father for the very first time...;)
Click to expand...

With the Biden's receiving 17.3 million dollars from foreign countries, perhaps Cocaine Hunter only gave the "Big Guy" 5% instead of the usual 10%.

A spanking for Cocaine Hunter?
 
Earl said:
With the Biden's receiving 17.3 million dollars from foreign countries, perhaps Cocaine Hunter only gave the "Big Guy" 5% instead of the usual 10%.

A spanking for Cocaine Hunter?
Click to expand...

Can't wait for the Biden's to explain why they felt the need to set up at least 20 shell corporations that served no purpose other then to receive money and transfer it.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
Can't wait for the Biden's to explain why they felt the need to set up at least 20 shell corporations that served no purpose other then to receive money and transfer it.
Click to expand...

I believe that in today’s vernacular, it’s called “money laundering,” which is illegal.

Millions of illegal dollars go into the shell companies and come out, clean as a whistle.
 
Earl said:
I believe that in today’s vernacular, it’s called “money laundering,” which is illegal.

Millions of illegal dollars go into the shell companies and come out, clean as a whistle.
Click to expand...

I have to be honest, I've never understood money laundering.

I get that you use illegally obtained cash to turn it into a valid source but can't they still question where that original money came from?

I mean if they track the source of the money you used to buy a house to a shell corporation can't they also track the source of how the money got to the shell corporation in the first place?

Seems like the same thing to me.
 
Doc Dutch said:
^^^
Hates immigrants because he's afraid of competition. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

I don't hate immigrants at all......all of my grandparents were immigrants.......you fuckwits always ignore the other word for some reason......I object to ILLEGAL immigration......for the same reason I object to the other illegal things that lib'ruls ignore......shoplifting, burning cars and vehicles to 'protest', ballot harvesting....using government agencies to attack your political oppnents.....taking $5M bribes while holding public office......."you know, that thing"......
 
Tinkerpeach said:
I have to be honest, I've never understood money laundering.

I get that you use illegally obtained cash to turn it into a valid source but can't they still question where that original money came from?

I mean if they track the source of the money you used to buy a house to a shell corporation can't they also track the source of how the money got to the shell corporation in the first place?

Seems like the same thing to me.
Click to expand...

It's a shell game, they hope they will not be investigated and most aren't.

There are many ways to hide the original source of the start up money.

I helped provide start up funding, seed money, for my son's engineering company. No one ever questioned the source of that funding (it was legally obtained).

According to the SBA, there were 32.5 million American businesses in 2021.

Only a very small number of them can be investigated for illegal shell and money laundering.
 
Tinkerpeach said:
I have to be honest, I've never understood money laundering.

I get that you use illegally obtained cash to turn it into a valid source but can't they still question where that original money came from?

I mean if they track the source of the money you used to buy a house to a shell corporation can't they also track the source of how the money got to the shell corporation in the first place?

Seems like the same thing to me.
Click to expand...

nowdays they can......used to only be a thing to hide the fact your income only came from untrackable sources......drug dealers or illegal gambling.....those who only dealt in cash had to find a way to convert cash into bank accounts........long ago the government started tracking large cash deposits......back when I managed apartments I had to file a form whenever I deposited more than $10,000 in cash (and lots of tenants paid in cash) to explain why I had it......I sold that business back in the mid 90s, but until recently I still did a lot of work for landlords and I know the requirements have only gotten worse......now I only do 1031 tax exchanges and I have to wire large amounts of money on a regular basis......again, I am required to file forms explaining why I have wires of hundreds of thousands of dollars every week.....the government spends a lot more time tracking the transfer of money than it did just ten or twenty years ago.....I recall just since Biden got elected the government proposed requiring transaction reports involving as little as $1000.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
nowdays they can......used to only be a thing to hide the fact your income only came from untrackable sources......drug dealers or illegal gambling.....those who only dealt in cash had to find a way to convert cash into bank accounts........long ago the government started tracking large cash deposits......back when I managed apartments I had to file a form whenever I deposited more than $10,000 in cash (and lots of tenants paid in cash) to explain why I had it......I sold that business back in the mid 90s, but until recently I still did a lot of work for landlords and I know the requirements have only gotten worse......now I only do 1031 tax exchanges and I have to wire large amounts of money on a regular basis......again, I am required to file forms explaining why I have wires of hundreds of thousands of dollars every week.....the government spends a lot more time tracking the transfer of money than it did just ten or twenty years ago.....I recall just since Biden got elected the government proposed requiring transaction reports involving as little as $1000.......
Click to expand...

My son's engineering company had revenues of 50.5 million dollars last year.

Their bookkeeper is kept busy with forms.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
nowdays they can......used to only be a thing to hide the fact your income only came from untrackable sources......drug dealers or illegal gambling.....those who only dealt in cash had to find a way to convert cash into bank accounts........long ago the government started tracking large cash deposits......back when I managed apartments I had to file a form whenever I deposited more than $10,000 in cash (and lots of tenants paid in cash) to explain why I had it......I sold that business back in the mid 90s, but until recently I still did a lot of work for landlords and I know the requirements have only gotten worse......now I only do 1031 tax exchanges and I have to wire large amounts of money on a regular basis......again, I am required to file forms explaining why I have wires of hundreds of thousands of dollars every week.....the government spends a lot more time tracking the transfer of money than it did just ten or twenty years ago.....I recall just since Biden got elected the government proposed requiring transaction reports involving as little as $1000.......
Click to expand...

So is it harder for them to track it from offshore accounts or shell corporations?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top