Democrats want to eliminate terms "husband" and "wife."

The Left believes all sorts of weird things.

For example, the call a trans person a trans-woman or a trans-man while telling us there's no difference between one and a biological man or woman. So, why the difference? Shouldn't a trans-whatever be just a man or woman? But they make the distinction apparently because there's political value on the Left to noting someone is "trans" versus biologically a particular gender.

Thus, one more example arises of the Left politicizing everything to fit their dogma....

None of the the shit you children are crying about is true. Libs barely mention trans. You guys thread about it regularly.
 
Last edited:
That's not possible. A marriage is a contract between two people. That means it comes with obligations and responsibilities. If two people are married and they get a divorce, then it becomes a matter of who gets what as a result of dissolving the contract. That usually means the courts get involved.

Child support
Death of one partner
Changes in economic status

There are all sorts of things that require the law to get involved in a marriage.

Living together is another form of this contract, only it's verbal not legal (written down), and that too results in potential legal issues when it ends.

I never once suggested that the law shouldn't get involved.
I said that the law should call it "civil union" to unburden itself of all the religious, social, and personal connotations of "marriage" in which the law needn't be involved.
 
What are your pronouns?

They have never changed in my life. However open-minded people understand there are people who do not fit into male or female. I call them wherever they self-identify as. I do not assume the right to call them what I want. They have enough problems without me trying to control them and their lives.
 
Back
Top