Appears the “well regulated militia” is well armed

archives

Verified User
The founders wanted serial killers to have weapons. Why else would they write an amendment that was designed to get everyone in the country to have guns and rifles? At least gun lobbyists got it defined that way and the gun lovers jumped on board.
 
”Gilgo Beach Suspect’s Home Held a 279-Weapon Arsenal”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/25/...ytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/new...earch-of-rex-heuermanns-massapequa-park-home/

279 guns, and in a State with strict gun regulations, of course the guy owned land in SC, which explains a lot, must be he was expecting Attila and the Huns

But America doesn’t have a gun problem, 279 guns in the hands of a serial killer, nah, nothing to see there

Poor anchovies,

Your link behind a NYT paywall but you think 279 guns is a lot?
 
It is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the founding fathers wanted their new government to regulate their arms after having just won independence from their last government that wanted to regulate their arms.
 
Poor anchovies,

Your link behind a NYT paywall but you think 279 guns is a lot?

Ah, that’s why I included a second source, duh

No, everyone has the need for 279 guns in the house, as I said, you never know when Attila and the Huns will stop by, or in your case, the kid with the hoodie
 
It is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the founding fathers wanted their new government to regulate their arms after having just won independence from their last government that wanted to regulate their arms.

Ah, why, they regulated them, slaves were not allowed guns, and in some colonies, colonies women, free blacks, and Roman Catholics could not own them (https://billofrightsinstitute.org/a...-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms-background-essay)
 
It is the absolute height of stupidity to believe that the founding fathers wanted their new government to regulate their arms after having just won independence from their last government that wanted to regulate their arms.

Most people still had to hunt to eat meat

The founders could not foresee the needs we now have for safety

And even so that law they wrote does NOT translate as you claim you stupid Putin ass lapper
 
Ah, that’s why I included a second source, duh

No, everyone has the need for 279 guns in the house, as I said, you never know when Attila and the Huns will stop by, or in your case, the kid with the hoodie

Poor anchovies

How many legal guns one owns is none of your business.
As for the kid with the hoodie, unless it is below zero or raining, that might just be a clue.
 
Poor anchovies

How many legal guns one owns is none of your business.
As for the kid with the hoodie, unless it is below zero or raining, that might just be a clue.

Never said it was, but when a serial killer has close to three hundred guns stored in his house it says a lot about the negative reality of guns and guns access in America
 
FIREARMS ARSENAL DISCLOSURE ACT
Summary: The Firearms Arsenal Disclosure Act requires individuals to disclose to law enforcement when they personally own an unusually large number of firearms and applies to them the recordkeeping, safe storage and other requirements that apply to licensed firearms dealers.

Based on the Gun Violence Prevention Act, S. 1878 (1994). For background information, see this column.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

This Act shall be called the “Firearms Arsenal Disclosure Act.”

SECTION 2. PURPOSE

This law is enacted to protect public safety.

SECTION 3. FIREARMS LICENSE DISCLOSURE

After section XXX, the following new section XXX shall be inserted:

(A) DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT

1) It shall be unlawful for a person to possess more than 20 [or pick another number like 50 or 100] firearms or more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition unless the person:

a) is a federally licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer; or

b) has filed and maintained an annual Firearms Arsenal Disclosure form with the [office of the state Attorney General].

2) A Firearms Arsenal Disclosure form shall be a sworn under penalties of perjury and require the following information:

a) Name, address, date of birth, phone number and email address of the arsenal owner;

b) That the arsenal owner is at least 21 years of age;

c) That the arsenal owner is not prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm under federal, state or local law;

d) Number of firearms owned on the date of filing;

e) If the number of rounds of ammunition owned on the date of filing equals or exceeds 1,000, then the number within 100 of the total;

f) Such other information that, pursuant to regulations, the [office of the state Attorney General] requires in order to prevent arsenal owners from avoiding disclosure by such means as temporarily conveying and then taking back ownership.

(B) ADMINISTRATION

1) The information from Firearms Arsenal Disclosure forms shall be reported to the public, including breakdowns by zip code, but all personal information about individual arsenal owners other than zip codes shall be kept confidential.

2) Any person who is required to file a Firearms Arsenal Disclosure form shall be subject to all obligations and requirements pertaining to licensed firearms dealers, pursuant to [cite state law if applicable, otherwise federal law].

3) The [office of the state Attorney General] shall promulgate such rules and regulations necessary to enforce this section.

(C) ENFORCEMENT

Any person who violates the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a penalty not to exceed one year in jail and/or a fine not to exceed $50,000.

SECTION
 
The founders wanted serial killers to have weapons. Why else would they write an amendment that was designed to get everyone in the country to have guns and rifles? At least gun lobbyists got it defined that way and the gun lovers jumped on board.

Nah... The founders figured there was only one serial killer for every 100,000 evil politicians bent on becoming an absolute dictator and weighted the risks. Having an armed population that could slaughter evil politicians was deemed far more necessary...
 
then come to my house and try to find out, unamerican idiot.

it is NOBODIES business but mine.

I saw the arrest of some gang banger on TV and they said his huge "arsenal" consisted of three Glocks and 450 rounds of 9mm ammo.

:bigthink: Prolly enough for a good day at the range for a family of two on Sunday gun day.
 
”Gilgo Beach Suspect’s Home Held a 279-Weapon Arsenal”
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/25/...ytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/new...earch-of-rex-heuermanns-massapequa-park-home/

279 guns, and in a State with strict gun regulations, of course the guy owned land in SC, which explains a lot, must be he was expecting Attila and the Huns

But America doesn’t have a gun problem, 279 guns in the hands of a serial killer, nah, nothing to see there

That's exactly right. Nothing to see here UNTIL HE STARTED SHOOTING PEOPLE.
The crime is murder, not having a lot of guns.
 
Back
Top